OC 3/1-2: Oct 1912-Jun 1913 - Hans Weisse: lesson: Friday, February 7, 1913
|
7. Weisse † : keine Aufgaben; Fragen aus dem Quintett 1 ; mein aristokratischer Standpunkt. Bachs F[is] d Präl. zuende; besonders die Richtigstellung der nach der Ges. Ausg. zweifelhaften Stellen; reference to misjudgment of the piano writing. 2 © Transcription Robert Kosovsky, ed. Ian Bent, 2007, 2022-23 |
[February] 7, [1913] Weisse † : No exercises; questions arising from his Quintet 1 ; my aristocratic standpoint. Bach‘s F[ě] major Prelude through to the end; especially the correction of the dubious passages according to the collected edition; Hinweis auf Verkennung des Klaviersatzes. 2 © Translation Ian Bent, 2022-23 |
|
7. Weisse † : keine Aufgaben; Fragen aus dem Quintett 1 ; mein aristokratischer Standpunkt. Bachs F[is] d Präl. zuende; besonders die Richtigstellung der nach der Ges. Ausg. zweifelhaften Stellen; reference to misjudgment of the piano writing. 2 © Transcription Robert Kosovsky, ed. Ian Bent, 2007, 2022-23 |
|
[February] 7, [1913] Weisse † : No exercises; questions arising from his Quintet 1 ; my aristocratic standpoint. Bach‘s F[ě] major Prelude through to the end; especially the correction of the dubious passages according to the collected edition; Hinweis auf Verkennung des Klaviersatzes. 2 © Translation Ian Bent, 2022-23 |
Footnotes1 Weisse’s String(?) Quintet was composed in 1912, and the first movement revised in 1913. It bears no opus number, and is now lost. See Timothy L. Jackson, "Punctus contra punctus…," Journal of Schenkerian Studies iv (2010), 87–186, esp. 184. 2 Jeanette has written “Fd Präl.,” but Weisse’s lesson for January 31 specifies the Prelude in Fě major. Since there is no other reference to the F major Prelude in his notes, I assume that she omitted “is” (ě) from “Fis” in the copying or dictation process. |
|
Format† Double underlined |