-
OJ 12/9, [2] Handwritten postcard from Karpath to Schenker, dated September 12, 1909
Karpath calls a meeting.
-
OJ 15/15, [F] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, undated
Weisse apologizes that was unable to attend on December 22, and asks Schenker to
reschedule so that he can discuss his latest piano pieces and an "Elfenlied."
-
OJ 15/15,[D] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 20, [1910]
Weisse has ‒ unfairly, in his view ‒ been failed in Latin. He is spending the
summer in Ischl, and asks Schenker if he could visit him in the Dolomites, even if for a
short time, to prove that he is not as immature as some of his schoolteachers seem to
think.
-
OJ 15/15, [J] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 9, [1911]
On summer holiday with little in the way of fixed plans, Weisse will be working
on some new piano pieces and asks Schenker's advice about form in the Ballade, Fantasy, and
Rondo.
-
OJ 15/16, [1] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 6, 1911
Weisse reports that he has reworked his fifth waltz and composed two other piano
pieces. He will now switch to composing songs, and asks a question about setting poems with more
than three stanzas.
-
OJ 8/1, [11] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 9,
1911
In promising to visit Violin, Schenker gives details of the lessons he has to
give over three days; — reports pending visit by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 15/16, [2] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 8, 1911
Weisse has a new piano piece to show Schenker, and asks to come the next
day.
-
OJ 15/16, [3] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 13, 1912
Weisse thanks Schenker for having taught him to make fine adjustments in his
compositions, and for imbuing him with greater clarity; he marvels at the subtlety of Schenker's
musical sensibility, and speaks of his joy at being Schenker's pupil.
-
OJ 6/5, [5] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 29, 1912
Weisse gives his suggested order of the compositions by him to be included in the
February 22, 1912 concert.
-
OJ 12/9, [5] Handwritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated March 3, 1912
Karpath expresses approval of Schenker's Kontrapunkt I and Moriz Violin's book on
the continuo. —He thinks highly of Violin and of Hans Weisse as a composer.
-
OJ 15/15, [G] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 16, [1912]
Weisse sends a newspaper clipping for Schenker's possible use in his Ninth
Symphony monograph.
-
OJ 15/16, [4] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 1, 1912
Weisse is concerned that Schenker will turn his attention from himself to Felix
Hupka, whom Schenker has just taken on as a pupil.
-
WSLB 116 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 2, 1912
Schenker observes acidly that the Ninth Symphony score project has been
dropped. He asks [in the face of the threat of author correction cost demands] for an
honorarium for correcting the proofs of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. He demands
to know whether Hertzka is serious about the plan for an edition of the last five Beethoven
sonatas. He repeats his inquiry as to the number of copies of his Instrumentations-Tabelle,
2nd edition, that have so far been released.
-
OC 52/427 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 3, 1912
Hertzka addresses Schenker's request for an honorarium for correcting proofs
of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie; he counters that the total author corrections have run to 600
Kronen. He is sending the volume to the printers today. -- He commits in principle to the
editing of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas [Erläuterungsausgabe], but on the basis of
the Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue sales he cannot accede to Schenker's demands; he makes a
counter-proposal.
-
WSLB 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), date June 4, 1912
Schenker urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner in connection with the planned
Organization. He reiterates his demands regarding payment for the planned last five
Beethoven sonata edition, specifying the sums, and disputes Hertzka's
counterargument.
-
OC 52/493 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 8, 1912
Hertzka makes a firm proposition on payment for the Beethoven last five
sonatas, and seeks clarification on contact with Dr. Harpner.
-
WSLB 120 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 9, 1912
A long letter, biblical in tone, in which Schenker prophesies that a "Flood of
the moderns" will come to pass, and in Noah's ark his works will "occupy the place of
honor," and that a "bright new light" will establish Universal Edition as superior to the
German publishers. He accepts Hertzka's terms for the Beethoven Last Five Sonatas edition
for now. He again urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner regarding the planned Organization of
Creative and Performing Musicians. He encourages Hertzka to deal more generously with Hans
Weisse.
-
OJ 9/6, [57] Handwritten letter from Eugen d’Albert to Schenker, dated June 11,
1912
Eugen d'Albert suggests they attend a concert together on June
24.
-
OJ 15/16, [5] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 27, 1912
Weisse asks to be informed of Schenker's contact with Emil Hertzka; Mahler's
Ninth Symphony is "filth"; Schenker's Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie has just appeared and he will
study it.
-
OJ 15/16, [6] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 7, 1912
Weisse asks Schenker a technical question about musical form; reports that Julia
Culp is considering singing his Mädchen-Lieder.
-
OJ 15/16, [7] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 21, 1912
Weisse reports on progress with his string quintet.
-
OJ 15/15,[I] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, [1912]
Weisse reports of progress with his string quintet; expresses his delight at
Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and speaks of "a bridge between art and
theory"; and expresses misgivings about Moriz Violin's pamphlet on the Vienna Academy. He
appeals to Schenker to give him piano lessons, and reports other matters.
-
OJ 15/16, [8] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 10, 1912
Weisse speaks of Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony and progress
with his own string quintet; — reiterates his desire to transfer from Violin to Schenker for
piano lessons; — refers to lectures that he is about to take with Guido Adler, and quotes from
Florence May's biography of Brahms. — He will write to Lorle Meissner; — gives his address in
Pontresina.
-
OJ 15/16, [9] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 15, 1912
Weisse asks detailed question on musical form for the Scherzo of his string
quintet.
-
OJ 15/16, [10] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 27, 1912
Weisse has been studying an example of rondo form in Mozart; he is enjoying the
culture of Basel; gives his return date to Bad Ischl.
-
OC 1 B/15 Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Carl Colbert, dated September 15,
1912
Schenker explains why he deprecates strongly giving a student only one lesson a
week and positively recommends two or three; he leaves the matter to Colbert, but gives him a
difficult choice.
-
OJ 15/16, [11] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 6, 1912
Weisse has heard nothing from Moriz Violin and is anxious to transfer to Schenker
for piano lessons.
-
WSLB 141 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 7, 1912
In a satyrical letter, Schenker asks Hertzka to make up his mind about the
compositions of Hans Weisse submitted for publication.
-
OC 52/105 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 9, 1912
Hertzka returns the compositions by Hans Weisse submitted for consideration,
giving reasons. — He has to stand aside for a time from the "Alliance" [recte Organization]
on health grounds.
-
OC 52/495 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 28, 1912
Hertzka is sending another copy of Beethoven Op. 109, and is pleased to hear
of Schenker's discoveries. -- He asks for a discussion regarding the proposed "Alliance"
[recte "Organization"], on which he has some new ideas. -- He may look again at Hans
Weisse's music in 1913.
-
OJ 15/16, [12] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 18, 1912
Diatribe by Weisse against Otto Vrieslander's plan to produce a simplified
version of Schenker's Harmonielehre, impugning Vrieslander's motives.
-
OJ 15/16, [13] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 11, 1913
Weisse proposes composing a completely new first movement for his string
quintet.
-
OJ 15/15, [E] Handwritten lettercard from Weisse to Schenker, undated, [February 1913]
Weisse reports that Bruno Walter, whom he encountered in the street, does not
know the difference between counterpoint and fugue.
-
OJ 15/16, [14] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 29, 1913
Weisse apologizes for having interrupted Robert Brünauer's lesson, and declares
his allegiance to Schenker effusively. He asks to call on March 31 (his
birthday).
-
OJ 12/9, [6] Handwritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated April 3, 1913
Karpath exchanges newspaper clippings with Schenker. — Announces a forthcoming
review of Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony (1912). — Tells of a potential new
pupil for Schenker who is currently studying with Schreker. — Complains at being persecuted by
supporters of Schoenberg.
-
OJ 15/16, [15] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 15, 1913
Weisse comments on Brahms's juxtaposition of the diatonic and chromatic and use
of modal mixture in his Waltz in C# major, Op. 36, No. 6, and asks Schenker to write about
this.
-
OJ 15/16, [16] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 9, 1913
Weisse reports receipt of a letter from Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 15/16, [17] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 8, 1913
Weisse sends a copy of a book [unidentified] and thanks Schenker again for his
teaching.
-
OJ 15/16, [18] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 16, 1913
Weisse asks for guidance on technical questions in his rewriting of the first
movement of his string quintet.
-
OJ 15/16, [19] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 12, 1913
Weisse reports on progress with his string quintet, and lists his travel plans
for late September.
-
OJ 15/15, [1] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 1, 1913
At the end of a relatively unproductive summer, Weisse is looking forward to
seeing his teacher.
-
OJ 15/15, [2] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 10?, 1913
Weisse asks for advice about modal mixture.
-
OJ 15/16, [20] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 13, 1913
Weisse reports a conversation with Franz Steiner about Richard Strauss and his
alleged interest in Schenker's work. — Weisse looks forward to having three lessons a week with
Schenker.
-
OC 1A/16-17 Handwritten letter (carbon copy) from Schenker to Newlov, dated September 16,
1913
Schenker regrets that he is unable to offer Newlov lessons in the coming
season.
-
OJ 15/15, [H] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated [September] 23, [1913]
Weisse expresses his delight at the approach just made to his teacher from
publishing house of C. F. Peters. He affirms his indebtedness to his teacher for all that he has
learned and, regarding himself more a son than a mere pupil of Schenker’s, he asks to be
addressed in future by the familiar "Du," though he would want to continue to use "Sie" when
addressing his teacher.
-
OJ 12/9, [7] Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated September 24, 1913
Karpath is pleased to have introduced Paul Breisach to Schenker as a new pupil.
He wants to send another young man ‒ whose mother is divorced and could pay only a reduced fee ‒
to him for instruction.
-
OJ 15/16, [21] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 7, 1913
Weisse extols the virtues of Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op.
109.
-
OJ 15/15, [L] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, undated [October 22, 1913]
Weisse reiterates his congratulations on the approach from C. F. Peters, and
sends his teacher two newspaper clippings of Johannes Messchaert's recital, given the day
before.
-
OJ 15/15,[C] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, undated [October 31, 1913]
Returning home from a lesson with Schenker, Weisse makes observations on the
second part of the Brahms's Waltz in B minor, Op. 39, No. 11, and seeks his teacher's
approval of his interpretation.
-
OJ 15/15, [K] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, undated [November 1913]
This communication consists of three parts: p. 1 offers an interpretation of a
passage from Brahms's Horn Trio, first movement; p. 2 is a quotation from Schopenhauer
concerning the ethical status of a search for artistic truth; p. 3 offers an interpretation of
the Waltz No. 12 from Brahms's Op. 39.
-
OJ 15/15, [M] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, undated [December 24?, 1913?]
Photograph of Hans Weisse with inscription..
-
OJ 15/15, [3] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 17, 1914
Weisse gives Schenker the ancient Greek term for the German verb
"anschauen."
-
UG 32/5, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Guido Adler, dated April 21, 1914
Letter of recommendation for Hans Weisse
-
OJ 15/16, [22] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 7, 1914
Weisse reports that he is engrossed in reading Jean-Paul, is resting, practising
piano, and studying Brahms's Second Symphony.
-
OJ 15/16, [23] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 16, 1914
Weisse thanks Schenker for clippings of two articles from the Münchener Zeitung.
Returning them, he critiques Alexander Berrsche's references there to the theory of the trill as
expounded in Schenker's Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OJ 15/16, [24] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 17, 1914
Commenting on an article by Paumgartner, Weisse asks to come and play some new
compositions, and warns that he may be called up for war service.
-
OJ 12/9, [9] Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated November 14, 1914
Karpath invites Schenker to contribute to the periodical Der Merker, of which he
has recently become the editor-in-chief.
-
OJ 5/45, [1] Copy letter from Schenker to Weisse, in Jeanette Schenker’s hand, dated June 17,
1915
In a six-page letter, and following harsh exchanges the previous day, Schenker
castigates Weisse for trying to avoid paying for four lessons, speaking of his own difficulties
in managing the profession of private teacher, and the unfair ways in which artists are treated
financially.
-
OJ 15/16, [25] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 7, 1916
Weisse extols the virtues of Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Piano Sonata
Op. 111, but expresses reservations about the political footnotes. He asks to bring a new
song to Schenker, since he is about to go to the battlefield.
-
OJ 15/16, [26] Handwritten letter, with original poetry, from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 3,
1916
As a sign of his recovery, Weisse sends Schenker two poems while stationed in
Berezhany, “Der alte Jude” and “Die Dirne."
-
OJ 15/16, [27] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 3, 1916
Weisse hopes to see Kontrapunkt II soon. — He reflects on the state of
humanity in the light of being in the midst of the war. — He incloses a cutting of an
article [about sources of Saint-Saëns's music.]
-
OJ 15/16, [28] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 1, 1916
Weisse is looking forward to leave in mid-December and to seeing
Schenker.
-
OJ 15/16, [31] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 9, 1917
Weisse now has a piano in his army lodgings, plays in the evenings, expects to
send Schenker an analysis of Brahms Intermezzo, Op. 119, No. 2, shortly. The Italian defeat
is near. He has sent a pamphlet by Walther Rathenau.
-
OJ 15/16, [29] Handwritten lettercard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 16, 1917
Back in military service after Christmas leave, Weisse reflects on the nature of
duty, and recommends F. W. Foerster’s Lebensführung to Schenker.
-
OJ 15/16, [30] Handwritten lettercard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 3, 1917
Weisse asks if Schenker has not received his previous message; he is reading
Kontrapunkt I.
-
OJ 15/15, [4] Handwritten field postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 16, 1917
Back in military service, Weisse thanks Schenker profusely for his
teaching.
-
OJ 14/45, [10] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 5,
1918
Schenker, Violin alleges, has accused him of a dearth of subject matter in letter
writing; Violin defends himself on grounds that his life has been disrupted by military service
and the impact of that on his physical and mental state. He accuses Schenker of insensitivity,
and treating him like his pupils. He defends his wife for giving food to the Schenkers, and
explains her motivation for so doing.
-
OJ 6/6, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 20, 1918
[50th Festschrift:] Schenker intends not to influence anyone in their decision to
contribute or not. — [Personal issues:] Schenker agrees to draw a line under issues discussed in
OJ 6/6, [6]; however, he accounts for his epistolary silence regarding Valerie Violin, including
the possible contact with Seligmann; he attempts to explain the matter of the jars of jam and
the absence of visits to Schönbrunn, describing vividly how tirelessly Jeanette works and how
dependent they both are on Sunday for work time; he expresses outrage that he and Jeanette live
so poorly while his pupils live lives of luxury, commenting bitterly on state of play over the
Sofie Deutsch stipend; he wishes the Violins well for their 6-month stay in Marburg.
-
OJ 8/3, [57] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 7, 1918
Schenker has implemented the increase in fee, for his pupils, and describes how
intolerable life is in Vienna; -- is trying with dificulty to book summer lodgings; -- reports
Weisse's declining of the invitation to contribute to the Schenker Festschrift; -- he is working
hard on his library.
-
OJ 5/45, [2] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Weisse, dated January 8, 1919
Schenker informs Weisse that his payment is short and points out the advantages
of lump-sum payment.
-
WSLB 302 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), May 18, 1919
Schenker reminds Hertzka of Hans Weisse's doctoral dissertation, Der Kunstwalzer,
and recommends it for publication. He laments, in provocatively vulgar language, that the
Viennese have become subservient to the French.
-
OC 52/923 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 6, 1919
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of WSLB 302; he cannot entertain early publication
of Weisse's work but wishes to get to know it now. — He hopes to have work from Schenker's pen
as soon as work for Cotta is finished. — He proposes that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf
Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be omitted [in an future edition].
-
OC 1 B/35-40 Handwritten draft letter, in Jeanette Kornfeld/Schenker's hand, from Schenker to
Hertzka (UE), undated [June 10, 1919]
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art and all manifestations of human life are inextricably
interconnected. He claims that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long
run. His sole concern is with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
WSLB 303 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 12, 1919
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art, life, and politics are inextricably interconnected. He claims
that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long run. His sole concern is
with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
OC 52/924 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 16, 1919
Hertzka acknowledges WSLB 303 and seeks a meeting; the Foreword [to Op. 111] will
remain unchanged.
-
OJ 8/3, [68] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 2,
1919
Schenker inquires again after Moriz, Valerie, and the latter's health. He is
expecting visits from Dahms and Weisse.
-
OJ 6/6, [10] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 17,
1919
Schenker hopes that colleagues will support Moriz Violin. – The court has favored
Emil Kornfeld unduly. – A move to Germany might save Schenker money, but he is uncertain how
many of his pupils would follow him there (only Pairamall has indicated willingness). – He asks
Weisse to act as an intermediary in booking a supply of wood for burning. – Dahms and Weisse are
due for simultanous visits. – He is glad to hear Valerie Violin is better.
-
OJ 8/3, [69] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 31,
1919
Heinrich and Jeanette have official permission to remain at Schloß Tantalier
until September 15. -- They have been exhausted by the visits of Weisse and Dahms. -- Weisse
[meanness] contrasts instructively with Dahms [generosity].
-
OC 1 B/41-45 Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Eberhard von Waechter, dated October 17,
1919
Schenker addresses the misunderstanding that has arisen, explaining his
willingness to contribute articles to Der Merker once his current projects are in print.
-
OJ 15/5, [6] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated October 19,
1919
Waechter understands Schenker's wish not to pre-publish his Art of Performance in
article form, and hopes that Schenker will provide a universal solution to the performance
problem; explains the editorial control of Der Merker, encouraging Weisse to submit his two
articles to it; expresses pleasure that he has procured from Halm reviews of Schenker's
Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt 1; is unable to send his Musikkritik der Gegenwart at present.
-
OJ 11/16, [E] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, undated [1928‒30]
Furtwängler cancels meeting on account of illness.
-
OJ 8/3, [85] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 12, 1920
Schenker inquires about Furtwängler, and reports progress with Hertzka.
-
OJ 15/16, [41] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated "end of June, 1920"
Taking his leave of Schenker as a pupil, Weisse expresses his gratitude for all
that Schenker has done for his artistic and human development, and declares himself ready to
continue in the service of his teacher's highest ideals.
-
OJ 15/16, [42] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 11, 1920
Weisse wishes Schenker an enjoyable summer holiday, and looks forward to visiting
him. He inquires about the possibility of moving into Reisnerstraße 38, in the event that the
Schenkers move elsewhere, and informs his teacher about the organization of a lecture series at
the Vienna Urania. He concludes with some remarks about literary works, Wedekind's Schloß
Wetterstein and Jean Paul's Levana.
-
OJ 15/16, [43] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 19, 1920
Weisse reports his arrival for the summer in Ischl, and the grave illness that
has befallen his grandfather there. He sends Schenker three excerpts from Jean Paul's review of
Mme. de Staël's "On Germany" (1810), which he expects his teacher will find useful as cultural
and political ammunition against the French.
-
OJ 15/16, [44] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 10, 1920
Weisse explains that his grandfather's death prevents him from visiting Schenker
in Seefeld, but hopes that he might nonetheless visit him elsewhere before the end of the summer
holidays.
-
OJ 8/3, [89] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 23, 1920
Gives date of return to Vienna, and confirms Tuesday meeting.
-
OJ 15/16, [45] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 20, 1921
Weisse has completed a string quartet, the parts of which are being copied out,
after which the score will be sent to the leader of the Rosé Quartet. He has been recommended as
a music teacher in a school being set up in India by Rabindranath Tagore, but cannot accept
because his knowledge of English is insufficient. He enquires about the progress of Schenker's
current projects.
-
OJ 15/15, [9] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, postmarked August 22, 1921
Weisse is taking a very late summer holiday and so cannot visit Schenker in
Galtür. He has finished composing a sonata and is writing out a fair copy.
-
OJ 15/15, [10] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 12, 1921
Nearing the end of a two-week holiday in Bad Ischl, Weisse hopes to see Schenker
in Vienna the following Sunday.
-
OJ 15/15, [11] Handwritten postcard from Hertha and Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated December 1,
1921
Weisse has returned a score to Universal Edition and written to Moriz Violin. He
has, with some reluctance, raised his lesson fee.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OJ 14/45, [13] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 2, 1922
In this direct reply to Schenker's previous letter, OJ 6/7, [2], Violin expresses
his dismay that some of the performing material for keyboard concertos by C. P. E. Bach,
including original cadenzas by Schenker, appear to have gone missing. — He reports on his
growing number of pupils, on the acquisition of a piano for his apartment, and on Hamburg's
extremely conservative musical tastes.
-
OJ 8/4, [11] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 9, 1922
Schenker apologizes for not having been in touch with Violin, mainly owing to
overwork and a severe diabetic reaction, which required medical attention. He reports on a new
series of Beethoven sonata editions – an "Urlinie-Ausgabe" – he is planning to
undertake.
-
OJ 6/7, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 6, 1922
This wide-ranging letter describes the difficulties encountered with Emil Hertzka
at Universal Edition, concerning an attack on the music critic Paul Bekker planned for the
"Miscellanea" of Tonwille 2. — He expresses his displeasure with Weisse for putting his success
as a composer in the way of aiding his teacher's cause, and for exploiting his teacher's
generosity. — Ends with generous praise for Violin's musicianship.
-
OJ 15/15, [13] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 17, 1922
Weisse has returned to Vienna, thanks Schenker for the Galtür visit, and will
order the bread [for diabetics] the next day.
-
OJ 15/16, [46] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated July 21, 1922
Weisse reports from Vienna that a sum of money has arrived, and will be paid to
its intended recipient (Kohn), and gives an account of his and Hertha Weisse's travels in
Vorarlberg following a visit to the Schenkers in Galtür.
-
OJ 8/4, [13] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9, 1922
Schenker reports the publication of the second part of Kontrapunkt and continued
difficulties with Universal Edition.
-
OJ 15/16, [47] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated August 11, 1922
Weisse reports that he is dealing with business matters entrusted to him by
Schenker, and thanks his teacher for arranging the posting of Kontrapunkt 2, which he is in the
midst of reading.
-
OJ 14/45, [15] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 3, 1922
Violin reports that his son Karl has suffered several setbacks of health,
including inflammation of a cardiac muscle. Plans for Musikhochschule in Hamburg are making
strides.
-
OJ 8/4, [16] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 29, 1922
Schenker reports, among other things, that Hans Weisse has returned as a paying
pupil.
-
OJ 14/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 6, 1923
Violin thanks Schenker for Tonwille 3 and reports on growing social unrest and
anti-French feeling in Germany.
-
OJ 14/45, [21] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated April 28, 1923
Violin reports on a brief trip to Berlin for respite from the strain of teaching
and his son’s illness. He is reading the second volume of Schenker’s Counterpoint, but asks him
for clarification of a matter concerning second-species counterpoint in two voices, discussed in
volume 1.
-
OJ 14/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 14, 1923
Violin has met an industrialist by the name of Max Temming who would be willing
to help make Schenker’s work more widely accessible. Violin will probably not visit the
Schenkers in Galtür this summer, as prices have gone up in Germany.
-
OJ 15/16, [48] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated July 15, 1923
Weisse summarizes his recent travels in northern Italy and Switzerland, and
inquires about progress on Der freie Satz, a work which he thinks will be an indispensable
foundation for the analyses in Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OJ 15/16, [49] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 7, 1923
Weisse asks Schenker why he and his wife treated him so coldly when they recently
met on the street; he suspects this had something to do with his recent trip to Italy, protests
his innocence but affirms his unchanged love for his teacher.
-
OJ 12/17, [1] Handwritten letter from Komorn to Heinrich Schenker, dated September 20,
1923
Miss Komorn is transferring her studies from Hans Weisse to Schenker. She asks
for suggested pieces to prepare, and for the day and time of her first
lesson.
-
OJ 15/15, [14] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 23, 1923
Weisse accepts a social invitation from the Schenkers, and hopes to reciprocate
soon.
-
OJ 15/16, [51] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 14, 1924
Responding to Schenker's explanation of a recent coldness between them, Weisse
asserts that his questions arise only from his own studies, not from work with his pupils; it is
not fear, but dependency on Schenker as a "medium," that drives him to ask such
questions.
-
OJ 6/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14, 1924
Schenker reports continuing trouble with Hertzka, especially over delays to the
publication of Tonwille 5 and 6, which were supposed to appear the previous year, and is
beginning to think about legal action. Hertzka has made his position so difficult that he feels
obliged to turn down Max Temming's offer of direct financial support for his work. He asks
Violin to help find a post in Hamburg for Carl Bamberger, a gifted pupil who, though he
neglected his piano studies for a while, is keen to make up for lost time. Finally, he asks if
Violin received any of the four volumes of the Beethoven piano sonata edition.
-
OJ 12/17, [5] Handwritten letter from Komorn to Heinrich Schenker, dated June 18, 1924
Miss Komorn thanks Schenker profusely for all that he has taught her in the
past year.
-
OJ 15/15, [15] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 2, 1924
Responding to a request for information about Brahms's meeting with Wagner,
Weisse promises to send Schenker the relevant volume of Max Kalbeck's biography of Brahms.
-
OJ 15/15, [16] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, 1924
Weisse has sent Schenker a volume of Kalbeck's Brahms biography, and reports that
Universal Edition is about to send him the proofs for two of his compositions, a set of vocal
quartets and a string quartet.
-
OJ 15/16, [52] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 28, 1924
Weisse is so absorbed in his work that he is unable to give Schenker a precise
number of subscribers to Der Tonwille among his circle of pupils. He will see Gerald Warburg
soon, but confesses that the latter felt hurt by Schenker’s article “The Mission of German
Genius.” — Weisse will devote much time to composition during the coming season, and for this
reason will forego taking further lessons from Schenker.
-
OJ 15/16, [53] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 6, 1924
Weisse apologizes for not writing sooner, saying that he will return to Vienna by
the middle of the following week.
-
OJ 15/16, [54] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 3, 1924
Weisse acknowledges Schenker’s recent letter, wants to speak with him face to
face about a number of things but uses this letter to defend his "hypersensitivity" towards
Schenker as stemming from the love and honor that he bestows on him.
-
OJ 14/45, [41] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 19, 1925
Violin reports on a successful concert in which he performed both as a soloist
and with the Klingler String Quartet. He thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10. He has received a copy
of Hans Weisse’s recent vocal quartets, and is puzzled by how a limited talent can write such
good music. He is going to see Max Temming, and has received four courteous letters of
acknowledgement from university music departments for copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 15/15, [17] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 22, 1925
Weisse alerts Schenker to the January 1925 issue of Die Musik, which contains two
pieces concerned with him. He suggests that Schenker travel to Munich, to negotiate a deal with
Alfred Einstein at Drei Masken-Verlag concerning the publication of a successor to Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 24, 1925
Responding point by point to Violin's previously letter (OJ 14/45, [41]),
Schenker congratulates his friend on the success of his recent concert. He writes at length
about Hertzka's last efforts to hold onto Der Tonwille, and about successful negotiations with
Drei Masken Verlag over its successor, Das Meisterwerk in der Musik. He has now to prepare
enough material for a yearbook comprising fifteen gatherings by July 1, so that the volume can
be published by Christmas. Finally, he echoes Violin's assessment of Hans Weisse, adding a few
disparaging remarks about his character.
-
OC 52/636 Handwritten letter from Robert Brünauer to Schenker, dated February 19,
1925
Robert Brünauer reports on the subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has taken
out.
-
OJ 6/7, [18] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his recent letter (and enclosure), which contains
evidence of Hertzka's false calculations of subscriptions to Der Tonwille – this letter in stark
contrast to the actions of his pupils Weisse and Brünauer, who had given more support to the
publication of Weisse's recently published vocal quartets than to his writings. Leaving Der
Tonwille behind, which has earned him little money and caused him much misery, he has written a
lengthy study of Bach's solo violin works, which will be published in the first volume of Das
Meisterwerk in der Musik, which will include a critique of Ernst Kurth's Grundlagen des linearen
Kontrapunkts.
-
OJ 9/12, [3] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated February 23,
1925
As a follow-up to his previous letter, Bamberger gives a full account of the
number of subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has either instigated himself or encouraged
others to take on.
-
OJ 12/17, [7] Handwritten letter from Komorn to Heinrich Schenker, dated April 7, 1925
Miss Komorn tries to arrange a meeting with Furtwangler.
-
OJ 6/7, [19] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 10, 1925
Continuing the story of the ongoing financial battle against Hertzka and
Universal Edition, Schenker thanks Violin for providing confirmation of the subscriptions paid
for by Max Temming, then recounts that, at a meeting with Hertzka and his bookkeeper, the
order-book for Der Tonwille had several pages torn out. Schenker is upset that his lawyer Dr.
Baumgarten, though an old friend, is not fully supportive of his position and would prefer seek
a compromise with Hertzka; this, Schenker feels, would rob him of much of his hard-earned
royalties, especially from the Beethoven sonata edition. He now asks Violin to find a contact –
outside Hamburg – who would be willing to order nine copies of Tonwille 1, as evidence that this
issue is still in demand, despite Hertzka's claims to the contrary. He has attended a
performance of Hans Weisse's Sextet, of which he found the variation movement and the trio
section of the scherzo to be the most satisfactory parts.
-
OC 52/644 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated April 21, 1925
Violin has had the order for nine copies of Tonwille 1 placed in Berlin, and
has collected the receipts. He has not heard from Weisse, but attended a performance of his
String Sextet and, like Schenker, found the variations and the trio section of the scherzo
the most successful.
-
OJ 8/4, [36] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 23, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for ordering copies of Tonwille 1. He gives a brief
account of a visit from Furtwängler, and mentions the arrival of the bronze medallion with
his likeness (designed by Alfred Rothberger).
-
OJ 15/15, [18] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 27, 1925
Weisse has come across a letter from Brahms to his publisher Fritz Simrock, which
he thinks will be of interest to his teacher.
-
OJ 6/7, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 4, 1925
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker sends Violin money for arranging the order of
Der Tonwille (which must consist of multiple copies of Tonwille 1); Hertzka's representative,
Robert Scheu, is currently studying the papers relating to Schenker's threat of legal action.
Schenker continues to express his astonishment at Furtwängler's ignorance of sonata form, a fact
that does not prevent him from earning huge fees for conducting in New York. He has turned down
a request from a lady who teaches in New York and a former pupil (now in St. Gallen), who wish
to spend some time with him in Galtür. He enquires about the personal difficulties that Violin
writes about in his letter, and asks him to say more; they will invite his sister for a visit.
He will send him a copy of the medallion (designed by Alfred Rothberger); the portrait by Viktor
Hammer is not yet finished.
-
OJ 5/7a, [2] (formerly vC 2) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Gustav von Cube, dated September 13, 1925
Schenker explains to Cube's father why his first teaching assignment went awry, but promises to
continue to help him; he suggests Anthony van Hoboken may be able to assist him.
-
JOB 94-3, [15] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, continued by Weisse, dated October 5,
1925
Schenker informs Hammer that he has recommended Otto Vrieslander as the author
of a short article about him to accompany the Hammer mezzotint for publication in the
journal Die Musik. Weisse continues the letter, ordering prints of the mezzotint for
Schenker and himself, and detailing arrangements for payment.
-
OJ 11/36, [23] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated October 6, 1925
Hammer encloses as a gift two prints of his mezzotint of Schenker; Weisse will
convey to Schenker a print from which the printing block of the mezzotint can be made for
Die Musik's purposes. -- The Albertina has just purchased one of the
proofs.
-
OJ 15/15, [19] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 7, 1925
Weisse asks Schenker to look at some suitable frames for Hammer's portrait of
him. He reports that several autograph manuscripts of Brahms are being put up for sale, of
which that of the cadenzas Brahms wrote for Beethoven's Fourth Concerto are particularly
interesting. He quotes from a letter by Gerald Warburg, indicating that Schenker's latest
theoretical concepts are being taught at Damrosch's music school in New
York.
-
JOB 94-3, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated November [recte October] 11,
1925
Schenker reports that the tube [containing a print of the mezzotint portrait
of him, for making a printing block] has been sent to the publisher [of Die Musik], and he
now waits to see whether the latter will commission an article to accompany it. He comments
on the Albertina's purchase of a print of the portrait.
-
FS 40/27, [1] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 12, 1925
Weisse has come across a letter from Haydn to Carl Friedrich Zelter expressing
gratitude and admiration for Zelter's analysis of "The Representation of Chaos" from The
Creation, and thinks that it might be worth looking up Zelter's work in connection with
Schenker's forthcoming study of the same work.
-
FS 40/27, [2] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 17, 1925
Weisse has found Zelter's review of Haydn's Creation and has copied out the
section concerned with "The Representation of Chaos." He finds nothing of value in the
review, but says it must have pleased Haydn because it shows that the composer was entirely
conscious of how he went about writing the work.
-
OJ 6/7, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 25, 1925
In this wide-ranging letter, Schenker commiserates with Violin about the high
cost of living, and his inability to raise his fees to keep up with it (in particular, he
feels unable to ask the wealthy Hoboken to pay more than his other pupils). He reports on
sales of a medallion bearing his image, and the imminent arrival of a mezzotint of his
portrait, made by Viktor Hammer, of which his brother Moses Schenker has bought the original
drawing. Vrieslander will write an essay about his work in Die Musik, accompanied by the
portrait, and things are now going well with the corrections to Meisterwerk 1 and the
writing of Meisterwerk 2.
-
OJ 6/7, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 15, 1926
Schenker agrees to to teach Violin's pupil Agnes Becker twice a week, as soon
as she is ready to come to Vienna. He reports Furtwängler's disillusionment with modern
music, and notes that Weingartner and Julius Korngold have expressed similar sentiments. He
is not optimistic that humanity in general will truly understand the classics, which
underscores the important of his (and Violin's) mission.
-
OJ 8/4, [42] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 11,
1926
Schenker enquires about Violin's trio concerts with Buxbaum and van den Berg
went and ask if Hammer's portrait has arrived. He reports on the possible difficulties in
putting together the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, on account of the numerous music examples
and separate Urlinie graphs, and summarizes the contents of the second
Yearbook.
-
OJ 15/15, [20] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 16, 1926
Schenker has, mistakenly, sent Weisse a copy of Reger's "Telemann" Variations
(Op. 134) instead of the "Bach" Variations (Op. 81) which he had lent him. Weisse asks what
is holding up the publication of the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, and suggests that Schenker
might write about Bruckner in the next one. A Brahms analysis would help strengthen his
position against his opponents. He also recommends that Schenker discuss a work that is less
than perfect, and cites Eduard Mörike's "Um Mitternacht" as an example of a poem whose
opening verses are beautiful but which deteriorates in meaning and poetic
quality.
-
OC B/192 Two typewritten letters from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated June 9,
1926
Letter 1: Altmann replies to Schenker's inquiry about manuscripts of two
Mozart symphonies. Letter 2: Altmann gives his summer travel plans; delay in publishing
article about Schenker in Die Musik; advice for Weisse over choice of
publisher.
-
OJ 15/16, [56] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 20, 1926
The composition of a clarinet quintet has kept Weisse from writing to Schenker.
Instead of writing a long letter to him about the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, he would like to
meet with him in Vienna to discuss its content.
-
OJ 5/7a, [3] (formerly vC 3) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 26, 1926
Schenker has received indication of part-payment from Cube's father [for Cube's
lessons] and promise of the remainder soon. Schenker travels to Vienna August 28. Weisse has
completed a clarinet quintet.
-
OJ 15/15, [21] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 21, 1927
Weisse provides Schenker with Gerald Warburg's address in New York City. He
also asks a question about Schenker's fingerings for the trills in the second movement of
Beethoven's Op. 111.
-
OJ 15/15, [22] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 14, 1927
Weisse calls his teacher's attention to a recent article by Edmund Schmid,
which questions the objectivity of Schenker's Beethoven research and deplores the slavish
adherence of his disciples to the concept of Urlinie.
-
OJ 15/16, [57] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 29, 1927
Lacking an official state teaching certificate, Weisse asks Schenker for a
testimonial that states that he studied with him from 1908 to 1915, and in 1919, and that he is
fully qualified to teach harmony, counterpoint, composition, and piano.
-
OJ 5/7a, [10] (formerly vC 10) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated June 1, 1927
Schenker congratulates Cube on appointment to professorship; reports that Oppel
has been appointed to a professorship at the Leipzig Conservatory, and on the spread of
Schenker's theory elsewhere; looks forward to visit from Cube.
-
OJ 89/1, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated July 3, 1927
Schenker gives Hoboken Furtwängler's summer address and urges him to contact the
latter, which could yield advantage, not least for the Photogrammarchiv. — Has seen Schindler's
Beethoven biography with notes on performance. — Notifies Hoboken of the normalizing of his fee
at 50 schillings per lesson.
-
OJ 11/16, [6] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated July 18, 1927
Furtwängler mentions several mutual acquaintances, and hopes to see Schenker in
Vienna.
-
OJ 11/54, [15] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 28, 1927
Hoboken reports on meeting with Furtwängler regarding the Photogrammarchiv, and
expresses the hope that it will be possible to interest Furtwängler in performance according to
the sources in the Archive; he encloses the final version of the "Aufruf" for the Archive, and
discusses negotiations with the Austrian National Library and Ministry of Education. — Comments
on Oppel's plan to teach in Leipzig. — Agrees to Schenker's lesson plan and fee for 1927/28. —
Describes his travel plans, which include meetings with Louis Koch in Frankurt, Ludwig
Schiedermair in Bonn, contact with John Petrie Dunn in England, C. S. Terry in Scotland, and
Maurice Cauchie in Paris, and photographing [of sources] at the [Paris] Conservatory.
-
OJ 15/16, [58] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 27, 1927
Weisse congratulates Schenker on the publication of the second Meisterwerk
Yearbook, of which has expresses mainly admiration. But he is unhappy with Schenker's dismissal
of the fugue from Reger's Variations and Fugue on a theme of Bach, and with his reading of the
Urlinie in Schubert's Waltz Op. 9 (D. 365), No. 5, and Beethoven's Sonata Op. 10, No.
2.
-
OJ 15/15, [23] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 9, 1927
Weisse asks Schenker if he could see him about a matter of mutual
interest.
-
OJ 15/15, [24] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 10, 1927
Weisse arranges to meet with Schenker the following morning (Sunday, December
11, 1927).
-
OJ 15/15, [25] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 17, 1927
Weisse thanks Schenker for supporting his latest project in principle, and for
informing him of Antony van Hoboken's intention to establish a publication related to the
the Photogram Archive.
-
OJ 14/45, [69] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated December 27, 1927
Violin reports that his concert (cello recital) has been put back a week
because of a tendon problem in his left hand. He owes Otto Vrieslander a response to his
recent written work, but he feels that Vrieslander does not truly understand Schenker's
cause, does not have the same "orientation" towards it as he, and expresses himself poorly.
(Weisse, he says, could have done things better.) However, all this pettiness is nothing
compared with the achievement of Meisterwerk 2, and of the "crowning" work that will soon
follow.
-
OJ 6/7, [36] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 29, 1927
Sending greetings for the New Year, Schenker expresses the hope that his
friend's fortunes will begin to improve in 1928. He agrees with Violin's pronouncements on
Vrieslander’s character and ability to convey Schenker's thoughts, and has no idea of what
to expect in Vrieslander's (supposedly) forthcoming monograph on him. Weisse, whom he
regards as a more skilled interpreter of his work, has announced plans for a monthly
journal, Die Tonkunst, to be edited with his pupils Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer, which
will be based exclusively on Schenker's theoretical approach. But he is afraid that Weisse
might leave Vienna, to teach at Damrosch's music school.
-
OJ 15/15, [26] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 2, 1928
Weisse gives Schenker Bruno Walter's address in Vienna, and informs his
teacher that invitations to contribute to Die Tonkunst have been sent out.
-
OJ 89/2, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated January 4, 1928
Schenker sends a feuilleton by Hans Liebstöckl regarding the premiere of Krenek's
opera "Jonny spielt auf."
-
OJ 15/15, [27] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated Januray 21, 1928
Weisse is trying to arrange a time to see Schenker. He has not heard from
Reinhard Oppel (presumably about his projected periodical, Die Tonkunst, but has received a
letter from Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 15/15, [28] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 25, 1928
Weisse accepts a social invitation from Schenker, asks whether Viktor Hammer
might also join them.
-
OJ 12/6, [1] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated February 1, 1928
Jonas asks to meet with Schenker to discuss the "matter of the
periodical."
-
PhA/Ar 56, [6] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Kromer, dated February 1, 1928
Schenker asks Kromer to send the Appeal to Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 5/7a, [13] (formerly vC 13) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated February 12, 1928
Schenker expresses joy at Cube's report of his class and private teaching; refers
to Hoboken's "Aufruf" and Vrieslander's prospectus; reports Weisse's plan for a monthly
periodical; thanks Cube for his efforts with book dealers in Duisburg and
Essen.
-
OJ 5/18, [G] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated February 14, 1928
Discusses plans to create of "journal," and conditions under which this might be
done.
-
OJ 12/6, [3] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 3, 1928
Discusses the proposal to create a "journal," raised in previous correspondence,
and airs Schenker's misgivings. Plans to send an invitation to 2,000 people.
-
OJ 15/15, [29] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 13, 1928
Recovering from illness, Weisse is unable to join the Schenkers for lunch,
suggests instead seeing Schenker on Sunday morning.
-
OJ 9/34, [11] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 24, 1928
Cube describes difficulties with his colleagues, loss of pupils, and reactions to
his lecture; Scheuermann and Schmemann will put Schenker exhibits in their shop windows, items
requested; inquires after Weisse journal plan.
-
OJ 15/15, [30] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 25, 1928
About to leave Vienna, Weisse asks if he can see Schenker to say
good-bye.
-
OJ 5/7a, [15] (formerly vC 15) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated May 28, 1928
Schenker sends Cube an article written for the Beethoven centenary festival and suggests a
"connection" between Bonn and Düsseldorf; refers to American professors teaching the Urlinie in the USA;
outlines summer plans.
-
OJ 15/15, [31] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 31, 1928
Weisse will bid up to twice the estimated price at auction for a copy of C. P.
E. Bach's Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments.
-
OJ 89/2, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated June 22, 1928
With thanks for birthday greetings, Schenker expresses how highly he values the
Photogrammarchiv while endorsing van Hoboken's turning down of an "honor" that he was offered. —
Schenker has, at Einstein's request, updated his entry in Riemann's Musiklexikon. — With the
success of the Urlinie through Der Tonwille, he no longer considers himself isolated.
-
OJ 15/16, [59] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 26, 1928
Writing while on holiday (in Bad Aussee), Weisse apologizes for not having
replied to Schenker's previous letter. He is enjoying reading C. P. E. Bach's Versuch, and
reports the illness and recovery of Viktor Hammer, who was staying in Grundlsee near the Weisses
during the month of June.
-
OJ 15/15, [33] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 23, 1928
Weisse points out a part-writing error in Schenker's Counterpoint, vol. 2. He
suggests that his teacher looks at Alois Haba's recently published Neue Harmonielehre, and
commends Oppel's recent article on Bach's fugal technique.
-
OJ 15/16, [60] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 16, 1928
Weisse reports the birth of his (first) child, a girl. In a postscript, he
informs Schenker that C. P. E. Bach's "Prussian" and "Württemberg" sets of keyboard sonatas
have been published in a modern edition.
-
OJ 15/15, [34] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 2, 1929
Weisse invites the Schenkers for a Sunday morning
get-together.
-
OJ 15/15, [35] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 18, 1929
Weisse regrets that Schenker is still unable to visit. He has arranged for a
photograph to be made of a Brahms sonata autograph manuscript.
-
OJ 15/15, [36] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 20, 1929
Owing to family illness, the Schenker's forthcoming visit is
postponed.
-
OJ 15/15, [37] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, postmarked March 2, 1929
Weisse asks Schenker to postpone a planned visit to the following Sunday, as
there is a Philharmonic Concert this Sunday.
-
OJ 15/15, [38] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 8, 1929
Weisse confirms an invitation to the Schenkers for the following
Sunday.
-
OJ 15/15, [39] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 13, 1929
Weisse arranges to meet Schenker outside the Musikverein before a performance
of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
-
OJ 15/15, [40] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 16, 1929
In response to a query from Schenker concerning a pupil (Gerhard Albersheim),
Weisse explains the requirements of the state examination for prospective music teachers who
have not had a formal training at the Academy.
-
OJ 9/34, [18] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 14, 1929
Cube explores the possibility of a student of his, Erich Voss, studying with
Schenker.
-
OJ 5/7a, [23] (formerly vC 23) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 15, 1929
Gerhard Albersheim will leave a space in Schenker's calendar that Schenker offers
to Erich Voss; will teach him himself because Weisse may not be up to date with Der freie Satz;
Voss to contact him.
-
OJ 15/16, [61] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 29, 1929
Weisse reports that Gerhard Albersheim is going to see him about the
possibility of having lessons from him. He congratulates Schenker on completing his study of
the "Eroica" Symphony, and hopes to be able to get together with his teacher sometime in the
next two weeks.
-
OJ 15/15, [41] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 3, 1929
Weisse arranges to meet Schenker on Wednesday, June 11, 1929.
-
OJ 15/15, [42] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 5, 1929
Weisse confirms arrangements to meet Schenker on June 11.
-
OJ 9/34, [19] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 18, 1929
Acknowledges two postcards; no word from Eric Voss; reports on teaching activities; reports on
composing and sends two sonatas for Schenker's comment.
-
OJ 5/7a, [26] (formerly vC 26) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 22, 1929
Acknowledges the sonatas Cube sent with OJ 9/34, [19]; reports on Reinhard Oppel
and on Hans Weisse's recent publication success; Schenker approves of Cube's use of pianistic
diminution.
-
OJ 15/16, [62] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 5, 1929
Weisse, absorbed by Schenker's ideas (especially the concept of "tonal space")
tells of his plans to write about his teacher's significance as a contemporary theorist. He
describes his progress in composition, which includes the completion of a set of six bagatelles
for piano and a Clarinet Quintet, and much work on an Octet. He asks about progress on Der freie
Satz and about the publication of Schenker's analysis of the "Eroica" Symphony, and reports his
and Hertha's joy in parenthood.
-
OJ 5/7a, [27] (formerly vC 27) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 10, 1929
Schenker reponds, on information from Reinhard Oppel, to Cube's question in OJ
9/34, [19] about finding a publisher; advises Cube to seek friends who will play his music,
after which publication should ensue. Schenker gives detailed comments, with music examples, on
Cube's two piano sonatas, praising them highly and making suggestions for
improvement.
-
OJ 89/3, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 18, 1929
Schenker acknowledges check; — comments on Hoboken's work on a Chopin Etude; —
discusses an approach by Vrieslander; — explains how the possibility of a professorship at
Heidelberg had come about.
-
OJ 10/3, [108] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 7, 1929
Deutsch gives a comprehensive analysis of the prospect of a publication
devoted to the Photogram Archive: its content, its editorship, the frequency of its
appearance, and the publishing houses who might be interested in taking it on.
-
OJ 15/15, [44] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, postmarked October 13, 1929
Weisse seeks to arrange a meeting with Schenker during the
week.
-
OJ 15/15, [45] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 10, 1929
Weisse will introduce Victor Vaughn Lytle to Schenker on Sunday morning; he
asks to borrow an issue (November 5, 1929) of the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung, which
Schenker has mentioned in his previous letter.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OJ 10/3, [119] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 26, 1930
In contrast to the uprightness of Schenker’s other pupils, Hans Weisse and
Felix Salzer, Hoboken is described by Deutsch as an unsteady, unfocussed person who may yet
be able to do some good but whose restlessness gives him grounds to fear for the future of
his library, and his own future.
-
OJ 6/7, [47] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated March 2, 1930
Schenker reports on two concerts at which Hans Weisse's Octet was performed
for the first time. Furtwängler was enchanted by it, Schenker was impressed by the quality
of the voice-leading in general, the construction of the finale movement (a passacaglia) in
particular. He was touched to see that a pupil of Weisse's, Dr. Felix Salzer, had subvented
the cost of the rehearsals and concerts, and the provision of food and drink for the
audience; this he compared with Antony van Hoboken's reluctance to help him with the
publication costs of his recent work.
-
OJ 15/16, [63] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 3, 1930
Weisse has delayed in replying to Schenker's recent letter because he has been
corrected copies of his Clarinet Quintet and Octet, which he will submit to the City of Vienna
Prize competition. He asks Schenker to help publicize the first performance of the Octet, at the
small auditorium of the Musikverein, and asks for the addresses of Angi Elias and Marianne Kahn
so that he can send them personal invitations. His wife is about to give birth to a second
child, and he hopes that Schenker's personal doctor Julius Halberstam might also be interested
in hearing the Octet.
-
OJ 10/3, [122] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 17,
1930
Deutsch was unable to hear Weisse’s new composition; he has sympathy for the
work of Eduard Beninger.
-
OJ 15/16, [64] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 21, 1930
Weisse has seen Furtwängler, who will write a letter of recommendation to
Breitkopf & Härtel with regard to Weisse's Octet. He suspects that Furtwängler will want
to consult Schenker about it, and asks his teacher not to be overly modest about the work of
one of his pupils, and to stress the need for an arrangement of the work for piano four
hands.
-
OJ 15/15, [46] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 14, 1930
Weisse expresses his unease about the dedication to Furtwängler of an article
on the "Urlinie," by Walter Riezler. He thinks that Furtwängler, who does not really
understand the term, may have put Riezler up to writing it.
-
OJ 6/7, [48] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 19, [1930]
After congratulating Violin on moving house, Schenker reports that an article
that is critical of the "Urlinie", by Walter Riezler, has apparently offended Furtwängler, a
childhood friend of the author. Furtwängler hoped that Hans Weisse might write a response;
in the end, Brünauer wrote one, and Weisse has sent it to Furtwängler. Schenker has himself
replied to an article by Eduard Beninger in the February 1930 issue of the Zeitschrift für
Musik. Owing to overwork, he was required to rest during the day between lessons; now he is
better. Oppel is again coming to Galtür and Schenker hopes that Violin will join him there,
too.
-
FS 40/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated May 26, 1930
Schenker thanks Salzer for sending an offprint of an article of his, and
comments.
-
OJ 5/7a, [30] (formerly vC 30) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 10, 1930
Comparison of Otto Vrieslander with Hans Weisse. Weisse's Octet impressed
Furtwängler. Meisterwerk III due out in October (reports contents); is now revising Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 6/7, [49] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 10, 1930
Acknowledging his recent letter to Jeanette, Schenker expresses his regret
that Violin and his son Karl are still troubled by health problems and reports some recent
news. Furtwängler's intervention with Breitkopf & Härtel on behalf of Weisse's Octet was
in vain; he had also sought the same firm's agreement to publish the "Eroica" analysis, but
this will now appear as the third Meisterwerk Yearbook. The Schenkers are expecting many
visitors in Galtür, including Furtwängler, Reinhard Oppel, Schenker's nephew and his wife,
and Jeanette's sister and family. Hoboken is prepared to fund the publication of a collected
edition of the works of C. P. E. Bach (with financial support from the city of Hamburg), but
Schenker is cautious about this because his paid involvement in the project might result in
work that would jeopardize progress on Der freie Satz. He has been included in the latest
edition of Meyers Konversations-Lexicon, and has received favorable citation in Romain
Rolland's latest Beethoven book.
-
OJ 71/20, [1] Handwritten copy of a letter from Leo Kestenberg to Hans Weisse, in the hand of
Jeanette Schenker, dated July 15, 1930
Kestenberg, on the recommendation of Wilhelm Furtwängler, would like Weisse to
give lectures in Berlin but first wants to know more about his background.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.565 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated July 20, 1930
In this 16-page response to a letter from Deutsch, Schenker thanks his
correspondent for his unstinting assistance (in relation to the third Meisterwerk
yearbook) and underlines the importance of a collected edition of the works of C. P.
E. Bach. — He then launches a long and detailed denunciation of Anthony van
Hoboken’s character, referring in particular to his treatment of Otto Vrieslander,
his ambivalence towards projects associated with the Photogram Archive, and his
absconding to Berlin to study the piano with Rudolf Breithaupt; Hoboken is
thoroughly undeserving of a high honor conferred by the Austrian
state.
-
OJ 71/20, [2] Handwritten copy of a letter from Leo Kestenberg to Hans Weisse, in the hand of
Jeanette Schenker, dated August 4, 1930
Pleased that Weisse is intent on promoting Schenker’s theoretical work,
Kestenberg invites Weisse to give a lecture at the Central Institute for Music Education and
Teaching, and offers his support for Weisse speaking at the Academy for Church and School Music
and the Conservatory [Hochschule für Musik] in Charlottenburg.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.566 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 5, 1930
Replying to Deutsch’s letter of July 30, Schenker warmly recommends his
long-standing pupil Marianne Kahn as a teacher for Deutsch’s brother. -- He then
comments at length on a newspaper article by Richard Benz (of which Deutsch had sent
a clipping), using a medical metaphor to describe the current pathological state of
music.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.568 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 23, 1930
Schenker is sending Deutsch copies of letters written by Leo Kestenberg
praising his theories for their practical application to composition and
performance, noting that Furtwängler is championing his cause everywhere. -- He then
launches into a tirade against the city of Vienna for snubbing him and his
work.
-
OC 54/317 Postal receipt, for consignment from Schenker to Deutsch, postmarked August 25,
1930
Schenker sends letters (from Leo Kestenberg to Hans Weisse) to
Deutsch.
-
OJ 89/4, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 29, 1930
Schenker invites Hoboken to tea to discuss attribution in the collected edition,
and congratulates Hoboken on his endeavor.
-
OJ 14/45, [87] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 13, 1930
Violin has just heard that Hans Weisse will be lecturing in Berlin in
December; he plans to go there to hear him. His pupil Agnes Becker, returning from a trip to
London, has discovered that Schenker's Beethoven sonata edition is much in demand,
especially from students at the Royal Academy of Music.
-
OC 54/328 Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 19, 1930
Deutsch suggests a way of placing the loose music illustrations and the bound
graphs of the Urlinien inside the third Meisterwerk yearbook. He invites the Schenkers for a
visit soon, perhaps on Friday, October 24.
-
OJ 6/7, [51] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated October 21,
1930
Writing after a long and serious illness, Schenker assures his friend that he
is alive and well. The doctors have pronounced him generally fit, but he suffers from a
painful tightening of the thorax, and also a flickering that causes him to "lose" letters
and notes. He has had to give many double-lessons of late, in theory, which he finds tiring.
To Hoboken, who, though gifted, is concerned only about his money and often comes to lessons
without having prepared anything, he would rather play than give over-long lectures. He is
concerned, for his own sake as much as for Weisse's, about the lectures in Berlin that
Weisse will deliver, and about his eagerness to debate with Alfred Lorenz; he is glad that
Violin is going to Berlin, and will give him instructions about what to do there. His
Beethoven sonata edition brings in 100 shillings per month – a good deal for the publishers
– and his brother still has half of his inheritance. But he is still alive – with Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 5/7a, [31] (formerly vC 31) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 1, 1930
Dr. Leo Kestenberg of the Prussian Ministry of Art and Education has, at
Furtwangler's recommendation, asked Hans Weisse to deliver three lectures on Schenker's theory
in Berlin, to be repeated elsewhere. Cube should take heart from this turn of
events.
-
OJ 10/3, [131] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 5, 1930
Deutsch advises Schenker to send a sample of proofs of the third Meisterwerk
yearbook to the editor of Der Kunstwart. He thanks him for copies of the letters written by
Leo Kestenberg.
-
OJ 5/7a, [32] (formerly vC 32) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 7, 1930
Schenker denies knowing a pupil-imposter; advises Cube to wait until after
Weisse's lectures in Berlin.
-
OJ 15/15, [47] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 9, 1930
Weisse asks Schenker for the address of Reinhard Oppel, who may be able to
provide names of people in Berlin whom Weisse could invite to his forthcoming lecture
there.
-
OJ 5/7a, [33] (formerly vC 33) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 10, [1930]
Discusses attendance at Weisse's forthcoming lecture in Berlin; refers to two
articles in Die Musik.
-
OJ 13/25, [12] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated November 17, 1930
Rinn recommends an discussion in the Münchener Zeitung involving one of his
assistants, Alexander Berrsche. He looks forward to seeing the third Masterwork yearbook and
speaks of publishing a selection of "aphorisms" from the second and third
yearbooks.
-
OJ 9/34, [22] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 22, 1930
Cube thinks attending Weisse's lectures would enable him to make contact with
"people of stature" in Berlin, where he would like to teach Schenker's theory, and asks Schenker
for the time and place, referring to the difficulties of travel in these "catastrophic times."
Will check up on Reichert. Has been invited to give six lectures locally, and has a concert of
his compositions coming up.
-
OJ 5/18, 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated November 26, 1930
Having misread Jonas in OJ 12/6, [4] as requesting a letter of recommendation to
Furtwängler, Schenker declines to provide such a letter. Letters of thanks to Schenker from
other Berlin musicians have not led to more solid connections. Most musicians have not dared to
take a position publicly on Schenker's teaching.
-
OJ 6/7, [52] Letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated November
26, 1930
Schenker summarizes the achievements and ambitions of several of his pupils
and followers (Albersheim, Cube, Vrieslander, Roth, Jonas, and Weisse), noting that Weisse
is the most ambitious of all of these though he is not completely at home in the new theory.
He fears that something might go wrong at Weisse's forthcoming lecture at the Central
Institute for Music Education, and hopes that Violin will listen with a sharp ear. Weisse
will give a trial run of the lecture at the Schenkers' apartment.
-
OJ 15/15, [48] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 27, 1930
Weisse, having received a copy of the page-proofs for "Rameau oder Beethoven?"
from the third Meisterwerk Yearbook, calls Schenker's attention to two
misprints.
-
OJ 15/16, [65] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 27, 1930
Weisse thanks Schenker for the essay "Rameau oder Beethoven?". He is surprised
to hear that Jonas has sought Schenker's help in finding employment, and urges Schenker not
to write a letter of recommendation until a concrete piece of work materializes. He is about
to go to Berlin to deliver two lectures on Schenker's theories, and has heard that Moriz
Violin and Reinhard Oppel will be there; he would like to give one of these lectures at
Schenker's home before a small audience of his most dedicated pupils, and suggests a date
and time for this.
-
OJ 12/6, [5] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated November 28, 1930
Jonas regrets any misunderstanding over his request for "a few lines of
recommendation"; he had intended only to ask for "general lines," not recommendations to
individuals. Jonas clarifies Schenker's confusion over his Munich lecture, and points to his
devotion to Schenker's cause for fifteen years, stating what he considers to be the core of
Schenker's thought as he would publicly represent it.
-
OJ 15/15, [49] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 28, 1930
Weisse is delighted by the chance to rehearse his forthcoming lecture at
Schenker's apartment. His Sextet will be performed at the Musikverein in Vienna; he goes
through a list of Schenker's circle of adherents who might be invited to his forthcoming
lectures at the Central Institute for Music Education and Teaching in
Berlin.
-
OJ 11/32, [5] Typed letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated November 29, 1930
Accepts Schenker's invitation to Hans Weisse's lecture, and gives two pieces
of information.
-
OJ 15/15, [50] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 30, 1930
Weisse gives Schenker the address of the Central Institute for Education and
Teaching in Berlin, where he is about to deliver lectures on his teachers
theory.
-
OJ 10/3, [132] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 1,
1930
Deutsch accepts Schenker’s invitation for Friday, December 5 [to attend Hans
Weisse’s talk, given in preparation for his lectures on Schenker’s theories in
Berlin].
-
OJ 8/5, [1] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 2,
1930
Schenker suspects that Weisse, with Leo Kestenberg's support and Furtwängler's
help, is hoping for an appointment in Berlin.
-
OJ 10/3, [133] Handwritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 3,
1930
Deutsch has an engagement on Friday evening, December 5, and cannot stay for
the whole of Hans Weisse’s talk.
-
OJ 15/15, [51] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated [December] 3, 1930
Carl Bamberger has just returned from Tokyo, and Weisse would like to bring
him to the Schenkers on Friday (December 5).
-
OJ 11/54, [29] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated December 5, 1930
Hoboken depicts the abundance of music in Berlin, contrasting Furtwängler,
Klemperer and Kleiber. — He has decided to withdraw his planned financing of the
Photogramarchiv's collected edition of C. P. E. Bach.
-
OJ 12/6, [6] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 5, [1930]
Jonas thanks Schenker for OJ 5/18, [3a], outlines the contents of the general
letter of recommendation requested, and informs Schenker that the Edwin Fischer circle is very
interested is Schenker's work.
-
OJ 5/7a, [34] (formerly vC 34) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated December 5, 1930
Gives dates and place of Weisse's lectures in Vienna.
-
OJ 5/18, [3b] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 9, 1930
Letter of recommendation for Jonas.
-
OJ 14/45, [116] Handwritten picture postcard from Moriz Violin and others to Schenker, undated, c.
December 10, 1930
Moriz Violin, Hans Weisse, Anthony van Hoboken, Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer
send greetings to Schenker, following Weisse's lectures in Berlin.
-
OJ 10/3, [134] Handwritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 14,
1930
Deutsch thanks Schenker -- and Hans Weisse -- for Weisse’s lecture. Hoboken
has recently acquired a second edition of Beethoven’s Sonata Op. 22, which Schenker may wish
to consult.
-
OJ 15/15, [52] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 17, 1930
Weisse asks Schenker if he can come on Sunday to report on the lectures he has
recently given in Berlin.
-
OJ 15/15, [53] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated December 27, 1930
Weisse thanks Schenker for his support; he has sent off the manuscripts (of
his lectures) to Drei Masken Verlag. He commends his teacher for the clarity of the
analytical graphing of the "Eroica" Symphony.
-
OJ 15/16, [66] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 8, 1931
Hearing that Schenker expects to complete Der freie Satz by early spring,
Weisse encourages his teacher to work systematically and unhurriedly at it. He reports on
Alfred Einstein’s defense of Schenker’s theories against Arnold Schering, and on a review of
a recent book on the Ninth Symphony in which the reviewer, Alfred Lorenz, sided with the
author against Schenker.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 15/15, [54] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 5,
1931
Weisse reports having given a successful talk to the Society for Music
Pedagogy on the importance of counterpoint; Schenker’s concept of line made a big impression
on the audience.
-
OJ 9/34, [23] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated February 10, 1931
Cube acknowledges issue of Der Kunstwart; encloses a letter from Walter Braunfels responding to his
plans to establish a Rhineland base for Schenkerian teaching at the Cologne Hochschule für Musik; wonders whether
Anthony van Hoboken might be approached for financial assistance on this, and if so how the approach should be
made.
-
OJ 15/15, [55] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 13,
1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for sending him a Mozart quotation, asks for a source
for it, and makes a reference to a certain "Preetorius."
-
OJ 15/16, [68] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 17, 1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for sending him letters from Felix-Eberhard von Cube
und Walter Braunfels, and in return sends Schenker a letter from Wilhelm Furtwängler. He
repeats a request for information about the source of a Mozart letter that he has been
quoting in a lecture to the Viennese Society for Music Pedagogy.
-
OJ 15/16, [68] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 17, 1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for sending him letters from Felix-Eberhard von Cube
und Walter Braunfels, and in return sends Schenker a letter from Wilhelm Furtwängler. He
repeats a request for information about the source of a Mozart letter that he has been
quoting in a lecture to the Viennese Society for Music Pedagogy.
-
OC 20/402 Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 20, 1931
Weisse describes the extraordinary success of his second lecture (at the
Society for Music Pedagogy in Vienna). He asks his teacher's opinion about his rhythmic
interpretation of the Bach's Prelude in D minor, BWV 926, and of the third movement of
Brahms's String Quartet in C minor, Op. 51, No. 2.
-
OJ 15/15, [56] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 25,
1931
Weisse thanks Schenker and clarifies a remark of his own regarding the
analysis of a Bach prelude; comments on the content of an edition of Mozart’s letters, and
expresses shock at the death of John Petrie Dunn.
-
WSLB-Hds 94479 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated February 26, 1931
Schenker asks Seligmann to read the opening essay in the third volume of Das
Meisterwerk in der Musik. He quotes from a letter to his pupil Hans Weisse which
demonstrates the attention his theories have been gaining in Germany, especially Berlin, and
expresses his regret that no one in Vienna shows similar respect for him.
-
OJ 14/23, [23] Handwritten picture postcard from Seligmann to Schenker, undated [February 28, 1931]
Seligmann thanks Schenker for his recent correspondence, is heartened by what
Hans Weisse has written (about the reception of Schenker’s work in Berlin); he looks forward
to reading about Rameau (in the third Meisterwerk yearbook).
-
OJ 8/5, [2] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 28,
1931
Schenker has heard about Violin’s letter to Weisse [concerning the founding of
a Schenker Institute in Hamburg] and expresses his interest in it, noting that it will be
possible to teach composition only after Free Composition has been
published.
-
OJ 15/15, [57] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 5, 1931
Weisse describes the extraordinary success of his lecture on Bach's Prelude in
D minor, at the Society for Music Pedagogy in Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [142] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 6, 1931
Having spoken with a friend in confidence, he advises Schenker to apply to the
Ministry of Education for help with the printing costs of the “Eroica book” [i.e. the third
Meisterwerk yearbook], and to get Furtwängler and Hoboken to write in support of his
receiving an civic honor.
-
OJ 10/3, [143] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 8, 1931
Distraught by the response to his letter of March 6, Deutsch explains the
efforts he has made on Schenker’s behalf and asks for further clarification about his
friend’s wishes.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [1] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 12, 1931
Violin says that things are in order [with the planned Schenker Institute in
Hamburg], but that Hans Weisse will not take part. He will visit Vienna at the end of the
month to consult his friend, whom he asks to say nothing about the matter to
Weisse.
-
OJ 15/16, [69] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 19, 1931
Weisse asks Schenker’s approval to approach Furtwängler about Der freie Satz,
presumably to seek financial assistance for its publication. He has been given a copy of a
letter from Mozart to Baron van Swieten, but expresses his doubts about the tone of one of
Mozart’s phrases; he hopes to meet Schenker soon, to talk about Bruckner.
-
OJ 15/15, [58] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 20,
1931
Weisse arranges to bring Furtwängler to Schenker’s apartment.
-
OJ 15/16, [70] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 21, 1931
Weisse reports to Schenker Furtwängler's confidence about obtaining money from
two wealthy people in Berlin to defray the publication costs of Der freie Satz and the
analysis of Beethoven’s "Eroica" Symphony, i.e. third volume of Das Meisterwerk in der
Musik. Weisse has suggested a sum of 4,000 marks for the former, as a conservative
estimate.
-
OJ 15/16, [71] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 25, 1931
Weisse, remaining confident that Furtwängler will provide financial assistance
with Schenker’s publications, thinks it is best to ask for help with the “Eroica” analysis
(Meisterwerk III) and Der freie Satz together; he will emphasize that the subvention for the
“Eroica” is the more urgent, and the cost of publishing the latter could be met by
subscription. From what Furtwängler has hinted, the prospects for Weisse lecturing, and
eventually teaching, in Berlin are not good; but Weisse may have other
plans.
-
OJ 15/16, [72] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 30, 1931
Following up a discussion with Schenker in the presence of Wilhelm
Furtwängler, Weisse draws up a list of Schenker’s early essays. Oswald Jonas and his wife
have been copying them and Jonas plans to write a Foreword to a new edition of these
writings.
-
OJ 15/15, [59] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 3, 1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for copies of the [Mozart calling] card – He has given
the one intended for Felix Salzer to another pupil, and asks if Schenker has an extra one
for Salzer.
-
OJ 15/22, [1] Handwritten letter from Willfort to Schenker, dated April 3, 1931
Willfort thanks Schenker for the card with quotation from Mozart
letter.
-
OJ 15/16, [73] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 7, 1931
Weisse continues to urge a cautious approach to Furtwängler with regard to
financial support for recent and forthcoming publications.
-
OJ 5/45, [6] Handwritten draft letter of recommendation by Schenker for Hans Weisse, dated April 13,
1931
In a letter of recommendation Schenker praises Weisse's creativity and
pedagogical skill, and declares him the best representative of his own theory.
-
OJ 6/8, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated April 14, 1931
Having heard that Weisse is leaving for America, Schenker asks if Violin has
had a response from Cube. He has had a postcard from a pupil of Cube’s, Erich Voss, who
would like to know the content of Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 15/16, [74] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 15, 1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for a letter of reference [for his teaching post at the
Mannes School of Music], and asks for some modifications. — He has not heard from
Furtwängler, whom he has also asked for a reference, and urges Schenker to be patient with
Furtwängler, too. — He is completing a set of three-voice piano pieces and wishes to
dedicate them to Schenker on the occasion of his leaving Vienna.
-
OJ 5/45, [7] Handwritten draft letter of recommendation by Schenker for Hans Weisse, dated April 15,
1931
In the second draft of a letter of recommendation Schenker praises Weisse's
creativity and pedagogical skill, his qualifications as a teacher of composition, and declares
him the best representative of his own theory.
-
OJ 12/6, [9] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated April 17, 1931
Acknowledges OJ 5/18, 6. Discusses plan for collected publication of Schenker's
essays and reviews. — Gives news of his own forthcoming publication.
-
OJ 5/18, 5 Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 19, 1931
Schenker acknowledges OJ 12/6, [9]. — The planned collection essays is
premature: 1,000 Marks is better spent on new works. — But the collection should be a
selection.
-
OJ 15/15, [60] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 21,
1931
Weisse suggests possible dates and times for a meeting between himself and
Schenker, without Furtwängler.
-
OJ 15/16, [75] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 21, 1931
Weisse has received from Furtwängler a letter ‒ probably one written to him by
Ludwig Karpath ‒ that suggests there is cause for optimism concerning financial support for
the publication of Schenker's writings. He copies out a glowing personal reference that
Furtwängler has written [in support of his application to teach at the Mannes School of
Music].
-
WSLB-Hds 191.573 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Deutsch, dated April 23, 1931
Schenker explains to Deutsch how the text (as yet unwritten) of the Schubert
song fragment, D. 555, should fit into his completion. He has heard that Ludwig Karpath has
referred to him as Austria’s best music theorist.
-
OJ 15/16, [76] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 24, 1931
Under increasing pressure from Schenker, Weisse assures his teacher that
Furtwängler will not be long in making up his mind to seek financial support for Schenker’s
publications. He asks to see Schenker.
-
OJ 15/15, [61] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 1, 1931
Weisse tries to arrange a date to meet Schenker.
-
OJ 15/15, [62] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 19, 1931
Weisse arranges to meet Schenker; he has written again to
Furtwängler.
-
OJ 15/16, [77] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 1, 1931
Weisse sends Schenker a letter written by Furtwängler, from which it can be
inferred that a major subvention for the printing costs of Meisterwerk III has been obtained
and that there is every reason to expect that a significant part of the costs of publishing
Der freie Satz will also be met.
-
OJ 8/5, [4] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked June 6,
1931
Furtwängler has sent 3,000 Marks via Hans Weisse for the costs of Das
Meisterwerk 3, and Weisse will continue to seek the funds for Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 6/8, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated June 11, 1931
Schenker expresses his feelings about the establishment of a music school in
Hamburg named after him, believing it to represent a spiritual union of Violin with himself.
He is sending him some recent compositions by Weisse, which he finds well
composed.
-
OJ 15/16, [78] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 12, 1931
Weisse expresses his joy and gratitude at Schenker's approval of the
three-voice piano pieces he has dedicated to him. Having sent his teacher several copies of
them, he asks for the names of the recipients of the other copies.
-
OJ 5/7a, [37] (formerly vC 37) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated June 12, 1931
Schenker sends pieces by Hans Weisse; promises letter from Galtür.
-
OJ 15/16, [79] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 13, 1931
Weisse sends Schenker further corrections of printing errors [in Meisterwerk
III], and notes that the book has recently been reviewed.
-
OJ 5/7a, [38] (formerly vC 38) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated June 30, 1931
Schenker encloses the [Mozart calling] card, and sends an article from Der Kunstwart; he
emphasizes that Moriz Violin's new institute is a "school," not a "seminar," and offers detailed advice;
comments that his theory from Harmonielehre to Meisterwerk constitutes a self-contained whole; recommends use of
C. P. E. Bach's Versuch with his theory applied to the examples; and foretells the Urlinie-Tafeln that should be
available to Violin/Cub in Hamburg and to Weisse in New York. His eyes have suffered and need complete
rest.
-
OJ 15/16, [80] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 25, 1931
Weisse, on holiday, will not be returning to Vienna before making his way ‒
via Nuremberg and Berlin ‒ to Hamburg, where his ship to America sets sail on September 17.
He gives Schenker the address of the Mannes Music School, and reports that he has heard
nothing of late from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 15/16, [81] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 5, 1931
Weisse outlines his travel plans before leaving for America. He has accepted
an invitation from Moriz Violin to give a lecture in Hamburg on September 16, the day before
he sets sail.
-
OJ 6/8, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 6, 1931
In this long, sentimental letter, Schenker thanks Violin for founding a
Schenker Institute in Hamburg and reflects on the intertwining of their fates through their
connection with C. P. E. Bach. He also advises on the wording of the Institute’s
prospectus.
-
OJ 9/34, [27] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 8, 1931
Line drawing of Moriz Violin. Cube reports on health of Violin's son; discusses his
relationship with Violin, and the prospects of the Schenker Institute in Hamburg; Cube will be assisting at
a lecture given by Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 6/8, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 28, 1931
Schenker is heartened that Herman Roth, once again, seems to be supporting his
cause. Schenker recommends a series of possible “guest speakers” at the Schenker Institute
and asks if there is some sort of monument or commemorative space devoted to C. P. E. Bach
in Hamburg.
-
OJ 15/16, [82] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 15, 1931
Weisse describes his new life in America; — is touched by the spirit that
pervades the Mannes Music School; — has given a lecture to the faculty on the role of a
theorist in a music school. — He reports that he has 22 pupils, and is about to meet George
A. Wedge, Dean of the Institute of Musical Art. — He asks whether Schenker has had any news
from Hamburg.
-
OJ 5/7a, [40] (formerly vC 40) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, undated [c. October 29, 1931]
Angi Elias has made a fair copy of Cube's latest graph of the C major Prelude
(Wohltemperirtes Clavier, Book I), which Schenker may use in his seminar; Cube to write thanking
Elias; Schenker comments on changes to Cube's graph.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [2] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 4, 1931
Violin thanks Schenker for his package. He has been swamped by administrative
business concerning the Schenker Institute, but is sometimes able to argue about musical
matters with Felix-Eberhard von Cube. He thanks Schenker for correcting a mistake on Cube’s
part concerning the analysis of the end of the C major Prelude from the first book of Bach’s
Well-tempered Clavier.
-
OJ 15/16, [83] Handwritten letter from Hertha Weisse to the Schenkers, dated November 5,
1931
Hertha Weisse thanks the Schenkers for an invitation to their place, and asks
Jeanette to suggest two possible dates.
-
FS 40/1, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated November 6, 1931
Salzer has overpaid and Schenker will return the excess.
-
OJ 11/16, [9] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November 8, 1931
Furtwängler would hear with Schenker. — He has heard good news of Weisse from
Violin.
-
OJ 5/11, [1a] First draft of a handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, in Jeanette
Schenker’s hand, dated November 11‒16, 1931
-
OJ 5/11, [1b] Second draft of a handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler in Jeanette and
Heinrich Schenker’s hand, dated November 11‒16, 1931
-
OJ 12/6, [10] Typewritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 3, 1932
Jonas reports on his course on Schenker's theory at the Stern Conservatorium,
two forthcoming lectures, an article intended for publication, two radio talks and a radio
recital; includes reference to his later textbook Das Wesen des musikalischen
Kunstwerks.
-
FS 40/1, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated April 19, 1932
Schenker reports on a letter from Weisse and asks Salzer to translate an
interview text for him.
-
OJ 9/34, [31] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 8, 1932
Cube sends Schenker an Urlinie graph of Schubert's song "Der Dopplegänger," and offers an
extended commentary. Describes his work and state of mind, and comments on working with Moriz Violin; he
expresses fears for the Hamburg Schenker Institut. He has just got married.
-
OJ 9/34, [32] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1932
Cube reports a conversation with Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 15/16, [85] Handwritten letter from Hertha Weisse to Heinrich Schenker, dated May 26,
1932
Hertha Weisse reports that her husband will be arriving in Vienna in a couple
of days, but that the Mannes School needs a bit more time to consider a proposal [presumably
for the joint publication of the Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln / Five Analyses in Sketchform by
Universal Edition in Vienna and the David Mannes School in New York].
-
OJ 6/8, [13] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated June 12,
1932
Schenker refers to his “betrayal” by Herman Roth and shares with Vrieslander’s
letter on the subject. He updates Violin on the forthcoming publication of the Fünf
Urlinie-Tafeln, accusing the Mannes School of getting more publicity and profits from the
sale of the work than it deserves.
-
OJ 15/16, [86] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated June 21, 1932
Weisse acknowledges receipt of two letters from Schenker, but has been
burdened by visa problems at the American consulate in Vienna. He will reply at greater
length when he arrives in Grundlsee, in a few days’ time.
-
FIBA 13/MO1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Rudolf von Ficker, dated July 27, 1932
Schenker requests a meeting with Ficker in Igls.
-
OJ 11/16, [11] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated August 2, 1932
Furtwängler thanks Schenker for his letter and for sending Urlinie graphs;
praises Schenker's "fight ... for genius"; he is unable to visit now, but hopes to later;
inquires about Weisse.
-
OJ 15/16, [87] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated September 14, 1932
After a long silence, for which he apologizes, Weisse congratulates Schenker
on the completion of Der freie Satz and reports that he has composed a violin sonata, which
retains the neo-Bachian style of his three-voiced piano pieces of 1931. He gives Schenker
the dates of his sailing to America and his address in New York.
-
OJ 89/5, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 17, 1932
Schenker announces the completion of Der freie Satz, and discusses the timing of
Hoboken's disbursement to cover its printing costs.
-
OJ 11/16, [12] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated September 22, 1932
Furtwängler was prevented from visiting Schenker in August by having to go
into the Cottage Sanatorium, Vienna. He hopes to see Schenker during the winter, and asks
whether he might like to do the ceremonial address for the Brahms
Centenary.
-
OJ 12/6, [17] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated November 27, 1932
Jonas has received a preliminary refusal from Anthony van Hoboken [over
subscriptions for Das Wesen des musikalischen Kunstwerks], and seeks Schenker's advice;
reports contact with Furtwängler; comments on lectures given by Webern.
-
NYnscl MP.0008.01/1/1, 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Arthur Waldeck, dated November 8,
1932
Schenker stipulates the conditions for granting publication rights for a
translation of his Harmonielehre, and asks which other Schenkerians in the U.S. Waldeck is
acquainted with.
-
OC 30/18-30 Draft letter from Schenker to Albert Einstein, undated [November 20,
1932]
In this unsent letter, Schenker tells Einstein about his works and the
difficulties he has encountered in promoting them, and calls upon the physicist for help in
gaining financial support for the publication of Free Composition.
-
OC 18/32-33 Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 28, 1932
Weisse is uneasy about disparity among translations of Schenker's writings
into English, and suggests that he work with potential translators to arrive at an agreed
set of technical terms. He has renewed contact with Vrieslander, who has sent him a copy of
his recently published songs and Ländler. His work in New York is going well and his family
is thriving, but he sees and hears about a great deal of suffering, on account of the
economic collapse in America.
-
OC 18/37-38 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated December 10, 1932
Furtwängler shares Schenker's assessment of Ludwig Karpath, and has not
written a letter for publication. — He has been exploring possibilities for Schenker in
Berlin, particularly taking over a masterclass at the Akademie der Künste, with additional
lectures at the Stern'sches Conservatory. — He has heard from Hans Weisse. — He encloses a
review by Herman Roth, and comments on the latter's character.
-
OJ 6/8, [14] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated December 19,
1932
In this characteristically long end-of-year letter to his friend, Schenker
mentions his forthcoming edition of Brahms’s study of consecutive octaves and fifths,
Jonas’s book on his achievements as a theorist, Zuckerkandl’s book on opera, and the
possibility of an English translation of his Theory of Harmony.
-
OC 18/43 Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated December 31, 1932
Karpath answers Schenker's accusations against Joseph Marx among others, in a
placatory manner. — He encourages Schenker to ask Furtwängler for the awaited letter. — He
will contact Marx and Franz Schmidt.
-
OJ 5/44, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Arthur Waldeck, dated December 31,
1932
Schenker thanks Waldeck for sample translations, which he will forward to Hans
Weisse for comment.
-
OC 18/29 Typewritten letter from Frederick E. Auslander to Schenker, dated January 5,
1933
Auslander seeks permission from Schenker and his publishers to translate some of
his works.
-
OJ 15/16, [88] Handwritten letter from Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated February 15,
1933
Hertha Weisse reports that, through Hans's teaching at Columbia University and
the Mannes School, Schenker's work has gained a footing in New York (where people seem more
receptive to new ideas), and she expresses her gratitude to Schenker for breathing life into
the spirit that has given such joy to her husband's pupils. The children are growing up
speaking German, and she has begun to restudy the piano.
-
OJ 15/16, [89] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 15, 1933
Weisse has received a copy of Otto Vrieslander's recently published songs and
has written Vrieslander a long, critical letter. — He reports on initiatives to have some of
Schenker's writings translated into English, and on the success of his analysis of the Bach
C major Prelude. Their having purchased copies of the Five Analyses in Sketchform/Fünf
Urlinie-Tafeln, published by the David Mannes School, is further testimony of Schenker's
success on American soil.
-
OJ 8/5, [16] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 26, 1933
Schenker reports on Hans Weisse’s phenomenal success as a teacher in New York,
and complains about Joseph Marx’s duplicitous behavior.
-
OeNB H Autogr.856/20-4 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Josef Marx, dated March 4, 1933
Schenker speaks of his work having been proscribed in Vienna for 25 years, and
also allusively about a certain father and son. He compares the situation in Vienna
adversely with the size of Hans Weisse's lecture audience and his remuneration in New York.
Schenker asks for another meeting.
-
OJ 15/16, [90] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 17, 1933
Weisse reports the success of his lecture on the C minor prelude from the
Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1. — He is currently giving two lectures on a Haydn's sonata. —
He inquires about the possibility of having Schenker's foreground graphs for the "Eroica"
Symphony printed separately and sold to his pupils, for a series of lectures planned for the
following year; the profits entirely to Schenker. — He sees little prospect visiting Europe
in the summer, as his financial situation has worsened: the Mannes School has been forced to
reduce his teaching for the next season. — He expresses his doubts about Vrieslander's
ability to reshape Schenker's Harmonielehre as a school textbook, and about the value of
Harmonielehre itself in the light of his teacher's most advanced theoretical
ideas.
-
OJ 5/18, 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated March 22, 1933
Schenker recounts Joseph Marx's requirements for adapting his Harmonielehre
for teaching purposes, and the involvement of Alfred Kalmus at UE. — Refers to Vrieslander's
adaptation of Kontrapunkt and Jonas's of Harmonielehre. — Reports Hans Weisse's success;
alludes to the Handel-Schenker Saul project.
-
OJ 89/6, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated March 22, 1933
Schenker thanks Hoboken for money transferred, for contact with Dlabač, and
for information about Jonas. — Oktaven u. Quinten may be published within three weeks. —
Schenker has warned Kalmus about paper quality and lithographer. — He expresses reservations
about Joseph Marx for inability to understand his work. — Weisse has 90 students enrolled
for his course [at Mannes School]; and Furtwängler deems Schenker the "great music
theorist."
-
OJ 15/16, [91] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 30, 1933
In this long letter, Weisse expresses his bitter regret about Otto
Vrieslander's reaction to his criticism of a recently published collection of his
(Vrieslander's) songs, and to Schenker's exaggerated claims of their worth. Weisse defends
his critical stance on the grounds that objective discussions are the only worthwhile ones,
and that he took the trouble to write about the songs in a 14-page letter to Vrieslander
only for the sake of art (in the Schenkerian sense) and feels hurt both by Vrieslander's
personal reaction to Weisse's criticism and by Schenker's defence of the older pupil. — In
the final paragraph, he inquires again about gaining permission to make multiple copies of
Schenker's foreground graph of the "Eroica" Symphony.
-
OC 18/30 Typewritten letter from Frederick E. Auslander to Schenker, dated April 8,
1933
Auslander and Weisse plan to wait for clarity over the Marx Harmonielehre plan. —
Meanwhile, Auslander will publish extracts from Schenker's works in a magazine, with a view to
complete translations later.
-
OJ 5/7a, [46] (formerly vC 46) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 14, 1933
Schenker disagrees with Cube's assertion in OJ 9/34, [37], that the Urlinie of the theme of
Beethoven, Op. 26, first movement, was a third-progression, not a fifth-progression, giving graphic proofs and
explaining Cube's misuse of the neighbor note. Hitler has done "historical service" in getting rid of Marxism;
someone is needed to get rid of musical Marxists; Schenker has created the tools. He provides background to
Moriz Violin's departure from Hamburg, reports on Jonas, Weisse, and Oppel, and inquires whether Cube has heard
from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 15/16, [92] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated May 23, 1933
Weisse thanks Schenker for Brahms's Oktaven u. Quinten, which he finds too
specialist a work to be of use to the uninitiated in Schenker's approach, and therefore does
not recommend for translation into English or use as a textbook. He reports a brief meeting
with Alfred Kalmus and a recent concert of his works, including a new violin sonata. He
gives Schenker his summer holiday address.
-
OJ 15/16, [93] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated July 27, 1933
Weisse thanks Schenker for a copy of an (unidentified) essay; he is
preoccupied by news of his father's death, and reports that the year ahead will be a
difficult one for America, in spite of the more optimistic mood that has come about since
Roosevelt became President. He has completed a Variations and Fugue on a Popular American
Song, for two pianos, and is now at work on a new string quartet.
-
OJ 6/8, [24] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 9, 1933
Schenker suggests a possible time for Wolf’s first lesson, and a schedule for
him and Miss Weber. He is surprised to hear that Violin is thinking of emigrating to
Palestine, and suggests that the Jews there should come to Vienna to study with himself as a
“first-class Jew.” Their summer plans are not yet fixed.
-
OJ 15/16, [94] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 15, 1934
Weisse apologizes for long silence, largely on account of depression at the
lack of enrollment at Mannes and of enthusiasm for his recently published Violin Sonata. —
At Mannes he lectures about his own work, because it is important to show how Schenkerian
theory can have a practical application for composers; his pupil Israel Citkowitz is the
only cause for optimism. — At Columbia University, where he "smuggles" Schenkerian theory
into his lectures, enrolment continues to be large. — He sends a copy of his Violin Sonata,
and promises his Variations on a Popular American Song. — He is not coming to Europe this
summer. — Universal Edition is going ahead with a schools' version of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, but he is surprised that Alfred Kalmus expects him to be involved in an
American edition of this.
-
FS 40/1, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated March 25, 1934
Schenker cancels the seminar for March 30, and sends Easter greetings. — Is keen
to read the manuscript of Salzer's book. — Reports letter from Weisse regarding an English
translation of Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 89/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated April 7, 1934
Schenker corrects and explains his error in counting subscriptions to Jonas's
book.
-
OJ 12/6, [31] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated April 15, 1934
Jonas acknowledges three communications; Hoboken has increased his subvention
for Jonas's book; Furtwängler has agreed to write a supporting letter. — Jonas proposes a
series of individual critical introductions to most frequently performed piano works and
concertos.
-
OJ 5/18, 41 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 23, 1934
Free Composition is completed. Schenker is pleased that Hoboken has come
round; — he gives Weisse's address; — Schenker has ordered five copies of Jonas's book; — he
reports that Salzer has completed a new book; — questions Jonas about his new plan, but
welcomes it; — Goos may not realize that Schenker is a Jew.
-
OC 44/41 Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated June 2, 1934
Weisse will send Schenker his Variations and Fugue for 2 pianos when copies
are ready; he is glad to learn that Oswald Jonas's book will soon be published. He describes
the beauty of Tenants Harbor, Maine, where his family is spending the summer
vacation.
-
FS 40/1, [24] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Salzer, undated [June 18,
1934]
Reports contents of letter from Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 15/16, [95] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated September 23, 1934
Weisse reports a visit from Victor Vaughn Lytle, to whom Schenker had recently
written, and the receipt of Oswald Jonas's recent book, on which he comments. The Weisses
have spent a lovely summer by the sea, in the midst of unspoiled nature, and he has
completed a set of five six-voice madrigals on Goethe texts and a string quartet. He reports
and laments his mother’s death.
-
OJ 5/18, 59 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 16, 1934
Schenker cautions Jonas that he detects "something afoot" with Hoboken and his
wife. — Mentions Hans Wolf's reentry problems and reports on German students coming to him.
—An article on Schenker has been included in Spanish Enciclopedia universale. —Reports on
Zuckerkandl, Breisach, von Cube, and Weisse.
-
OJ 12/6, [40] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 19, 1934
Jonas encloses a translation of an English review of his book; comments
despairingly. — Lawsuit against Willi Reich comes to court on December 22. — Jonas hopes to
give lectures in Vienna. —Asks if Schenker knows Carl Johann Perl. —Holiday good
wishes.
-
OJ 15/16, [96] Handwritten letter from Hertha Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated February 21,
1935
In this letter of condolence, sent together with one by Hans, Hertha Weisse
explains that the obituary of Schenker in the New York Times by Olin Downes, though based
partly on information supplied by Hans, was hastily written and contains many errors. A
pupil of Hans [Adele Katz] has prepared an article on Schenker's theory, which will soon be
published in an American music journal.
-
OJ 15/16, [97] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated February 21,
1935
In a letter of condolence to Schenker's widow, Weisse expresses his distress
at having, within the space of two years, lost his parents and now his spiritual father. He
offers to help Jeanette and Oswald Jonas read the proofs for Der freie Satz; but he cannot
afford to come to Europe in the summer, as the Mannes College can guarantee only half his
salary for next year. He asks her to send him a memento of her husband, and to consider
entrusting to him the care of some of Schenker's unpublished work.
-
OJ 15/16, [98] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated May 26,
1935
Weisse outlines a plan to give Jeanette financial support in the form of a
collection from his most dedicated pupils, equivalent to 200 Austrian shillings per month,
for a year, and encloses the first of three planned annual payments. — He inquires whether
Schenker's notes on C. P. E. Bach’s Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments
might be included in an Afterword to a projected English translation. — He plans an
exposition of Schenkerian theory for use in schools, for which he needs to receive a copy of
Der freie Satz. — He thanks Jeanette for mementos of her husband, and says a few words about
his family and their summer plans.
-
OJ 15/22, [10] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 5,
1935
Willfort lays out his plans for an abbreviated edition of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, and explains his negotiations with Alfred Kalmus of UE.
-
OJ 15/16, [99] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 14,
1935
Weisse thanks Jeanette Schenker for her letter and copy of Der freie Satz
which he has read through and is about to study carefully. His initial impressions are that
its conception and content are impressive, but that there are a lot of misprints; and he
regrets that the foreword does not mention the financial help Schenker received from [Paul]
Khuner. He approves Jeanette's idea of depositing Schenker's Nachlass in the
Photogramm-Archiv in the Austrian National Library.
-
OJ 15/16, [100] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated September 18,
1935
Weisse thanks Jeanette for sending a photograph of her late husband’s
death-mask, and other photographs. — He offers her advice about what to do with Heinrich's
library of books, and with his sketches and other unpublished analyses. The bulk of the
letter is a critique of Der freie Satz, about which he has serious misgivings, partly
concerning the title and subtitle, partly concerning its status as a textbook
(Lehrbuch).
-
OJ 15/16, [101] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Jeanette Schenker, dated October 22,
1935
Weisse thanks Jeanette for the photographs of her husband, and will distribute
them to his pupils soon, when he sends the next payment of financial support that he has
collected from them on her behalf. — He is actively engaged in bringing Schenker's ideas to
an English-speaking audience, and urges her to consider agreeing to a suitably shortened
version of Harmonielehre, rather than a word-for-word translation. — For Der freie Satz, an
English translation would do more harm to Schenker's cause than not to have it translated at
all, and it would be necessary to reconceive the presentation of the theory entirely,
especially with respect to terminology. — He suggests that there may be a market for
Schenker's library in American universities and libraries.
-
OJ 70/37, [1] Typewritten letter from Roger Sessions to Moriz Violin, dated December 14,
1949
Roger Sessions proposes that he and Violin meet.