OJ 89/3, [9] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 15, 1929

Hoboken encloses his analytical study of Brahms's Intermezzo, Op. 117, No. 1, and raises several technical matters. — He reports on his building project, and responds to Schenker's refusal, in OJ 89/3, [7], to continue acting as intermediary with Vrieslander. — He encloses a check for his lesson fee.

OJ 6/7, [44] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated November 24, 1929

After reply to some of the more personal points in Violin's previous letter, Schenker welcomes his friend's efforts to look for a publisher for the Eroica Symphony monograph, noting that, in spite of the difficulties that Hertzka has caused him, his books are still in print and his status as a theorist has been acknowledged by the the fact that the universities of Heidelberg and Leipzig have expressed an interest in appointing him. A recent article in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung will give Violin further ammunition when approaching a publisher. That same issue also contains an article by Schoenberg touching on various canonic works (Bach, Prelude in C sharp minor for the Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1; Beethoven, Seventh Symphony, finale; Mozart, slow introduction to the "Dissonant" Quartet). He feels that it is beneath his dignity to make a formal reply; but to illustrate what he means, and why he is contemptuous of Schoenberg, he provides several voice-leading graphs and other music examples concerning these works.

Diary entry by Schenker for 15 August 1929

Diary entry by Schenker for 2 September 1929

Diary entry by Schenker for 18 September 1929

Diary entry by Schenker for 27 September 1929