| 
 
 Downloads temporarily removed for testing purposes
 | 
        
          
⇧ PROF. OTTO ERICH DEUTSCH
           WIEN II.
           Böcklinstraße 26
        
        
 ⇧ 15. X.
            30
        
 Lieber Verehrter
! 
1
       
Zur dritten Korrektur: 
        
       
          - S. 7 (Inhalt) fehlt noch 63, 74
2
 
          - S. 54: “2. Satz” fett, wie S. 29. 63, 74
 
          - S. 63, 74: zu beachten S. 7 (Inhalt) und S. 97, 98
 
          - S. 87: NB “soeben” statt “sollen”
 
          - S. 98: “Finale” wohl besser Fraktur, wie S. 74
 
         
Soll man die Beilagen im Inhalt erwähnen? Der Titel hat sie ja nie
        genannt.  
 
 
© Transcription William Drabkin,  2023 
 
 | 
        
          
⇧ PROF. OTTO ERICH DEUTSCH
           Böcklinstraße 26
           VIENNA II
        
        
 ⇧ October 15, 1930
        
 Dear revered
              friend
, 
1
       
For the third proofs: 
        
       
          - p. 7 (table of contents): page numbers 63 and 74 are still missing
2
 
          - p. 54: “Second movement” boldface (like pp. 29, 63, 74)
 
          - pp. 63, 74: to be noted [on] p. 7
            (contents), and pp. 97, 98
 
          - p. 87: where I have marked “NB,” soeben instead
            of sollen
 
          - p. 98: “Finale” would be better if printed in Fraktur, like p. 74
 
         
Should the supplements be mentioned in the table of contents? The title
        never mentioned them. 
 
 
© Translation William Drabkin,  2023 
 
 | 
 
 
 
        
          
⇧ PROF. OTTO ERICH DEUTSCH
           WIEN II.
           Böcklinstraße 26
        
        
 ⇧ 15. X.
            30
        
 Lieber Verehrter
! 
1
       
Zur dritten Korrektur: 
        
       
          - S. 7 (Inhalt) fehlt noch 63, 74
2
 
          - S. 54: “2. Satz” fett, wie S. 29. 63, 74
 
          - S. 63, 74: zu beachten S. 7 (Inhalt) und S. 97, 98
 
          - S. 87: NB “soeben” statt “sollen”
 
          - S. 98: “Finale” wohl besser Fraktur, wie S. 74
 
         
Soll man die Beilagen im Inhalt erwähnen? Der Titel hat sie ja nie
        genannt.  
 
 
© Transcription William Drabkin,  2023 
 
 | 
 
 
 
        
          
⇧ PROF. OTTO ERICH DEUTSCH
           Böcklinstraße 26
           VIENNA II
        
        
 ⇧ October 15, 1930
        
 Dear revered
              friend
, 
1
       
For the third proofs: 
        
       
          - p. 7 (table of contents): page numbers 63 and 74 are still missing
2
 
          - p. 54: “Second movement” boldface (like pp. 29, 63, 74)
 
          - pp. 63, 74: to be noted [on] p. 7
            (contents), and pp. 97, 98
 
          - p. 87: where I have marked “NB,” soeben instead
            of sollen
 
          - p. 98: “Finale” would be better if printed in Fraktur, like p. 74
 
         
Should the supplements be mentioned in the table of contents? The title
        never mentioned them. 
 
 
© Translation William Drabkin,  2023 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 
Footnotes
1 Receipt of this letter is recorded in Schenker’s diary for October 16,
            1930: “Von Deutsch (Br.): Korrekturen” (“From Deutsch (letter): proof
            corrections”). 
2 Schenker has drawn a line through each of the items in this list,
              presumably to indicate that he has dealt with them in turn. There is also a question
              mark in the left margin beside the third item in the list (“S. 63, 74
            …”) 
 
 | 
 
Commentary
- Format
 
- 
			1p letter, printed sender address, holograph salutation, message (including list), valediction, and signature
		  
 
- Provenance
 
- 
				Schenker, Heinrich (document date-1935)--Schenker, Jeanette (1935-1938)--Oster, Ernst (1938-c.1939)—New York Public Library (c.1939-)
          
 
 
Digital version created: 2023-05-18 Last updated: 2015-09-18 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 |