Downloads temporarily removed for testing purposes

Documents comprising this correspondence:

• OJ 11/42, [1] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 11, 1892

  Since there has been no response to an earlier letter requesting major revisions in a submitted article, Harden has made the changes himself; he asks Schenker to write a second article on the omitted material; and he begs Schenker's pardon for having to act unilaterally.

• OJ 11/42, [2] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated November 29, 1892

  One of Schenker's articles will be published in an upcoming issue of Die Zukunft; Harden asks for further submissions; agrees with Schenker's positive assessment of the Italian soprano Gemma Bellincioni.

• OJ 11/42, [3] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated May 22, 1893

  Harden asks Schenker to write a review of Verdi's Falstaff in time for the Berlin opening of the opera.

• OJ 11/42, [4] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated June 27, 1893

  Harden thanks Schenker for an article on Smetana; encourages him to write on the Viennese appetite for Italian operas; and sends greetings to [Adolph?] Gelber.

• OJ 11/42, [5] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated September 29, 1893

  Harden encourages articles from Schenker on Leoncavallo and Bruckner.

• OJ 11/42, [6] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 19, 1893

  Harden thanks Schenker for sending an [unidentified] article with a lighter tone than some of Schenker's other work.

• OJ 71/42, [1] Handwritten message from Harden to Schenker, on handwritten letter from Hermann Woff to Harden, dated October 20, 1893

  Wolff encourages Harden to find him a collaborator for an article on music and concert life; having read Schenker's article on Bruckner, he praises Schenker for his clear and accurate understanding of Bruckner's music. Harden commends Wollf's praise to Schenker, and suggests that he write an article about "conductors."

• OJ 11/42, [8] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated November 9, 1893

  Harden asks after Schenker's health and encourages him to write an article on prominent conductors and an article on music education.

• OJ 11/42, [9] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated February 16, 1894

  Harden asks for Schenker's permission to put off publishing Schenker's article on prominent conductors until Harden himself writes something personal about Hans von Bülow, who had died four days earlier.

• OJ 11/42, [10] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated March 1, 1894

  Harden sends greetings to Schenker and [Adolph?] Gelber; he encourages Schenker to add mention of Hans von Bülow to his upcoming article on conductors, and asks Schenker to perform a thorough revision because the draft was not entirely clear.

• OJ 11/42, [11] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated April 13, 1894

  Harden wonders whether it is worth publishing an article by Schenker on Verdi's Falstaff now that the production has moved on from Berlin to Paris.

• OJ 11/42, [12] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, undated [probably post-April 13, 1894, certainly pre-May 5, 1894]

  Harden thanks Schenker for his submissions, especially "Konzertdirigenten," and asks him again to consider writing an article on Verdi's Falstaff.

• OJ 11/42, [13] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated May 1, 1894

  "The road is clear."

• OJ 11/42, [14] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated May 11, 1894

  Harden urges Schenker to ask Brahms to write something for Die Zukunft about the recently deceased Hans von Bülow.

• OJ 11/42, [15] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, undated; postmarked June 14, 1894

  Harden says he will look over an article by Schenker soon; he wonders whether Brahms or Rosenthal will contribute anything on Bülow to Die Zukunft; and he encourages Schenker to send him more articles in the future.

• OJ 11/42, [16] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated July 15, 1894

  Harden agrees in principle to Schenker's publishing elsewhere some material on which Harden had some claim; he advises Schenker that he has no following among the audience of Die Neue Review; he has heard nothing from Brahms or Rosenthal about contributing something about Bülow to Die Zukunft.

• OJ 11/42, [17] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated September 8, 1894

  Harden welcomes an article by Schenker on Eugen d'Albert, and encourages Schenker to get d'Albert to revise an autobiographical sketch that will precede Schenker's article.

• OJ 11/42, [18] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 4, 1894

  Harden urges Schenker to press Brahms [for material on Bülow]; he thinks that d'Albert will benefit from Schenker's article about him in Die Zukunft; he reports cordial impressions of Humperdinck from Cosima and Siegfried Wagner; and he asks whether an article he wrote was any good.

• OJ 11/42, [19] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 11, 1894

  Harden rebuffs accusations by Schenker that seem to involve a delay in Harden's response to a submission that Schenker hopes to move to another publication, and he accuses Schenker of reneging on a promise to write about [Johann] Strauss's operetta Jabuka.

• OJ 11/42, [20] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 13, 1894

  Harden denies that he will try prevent Schenker from publishing his material wherever he chooses; and he commiserates with Schenker over a presumed slight by Hermann Bahr of Die Zeit.

• OJ 11/42, [A] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, undated [probably October or November 1894]

  Harden casts aspersions on Hermann Bahr. — Advises that he probably won't have room to publish one of Schenker's articles, but requests that Schenker send it for his review.

• OJ 11/42, [21] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated November 24, 1894

  Harden encourages Schenker to write articles on the string quartet and on [Johann] Strauß and Humperdinck, but not on Brahms. — He explains why he lost his temper with Schenker in an earlier letter (see OJ 11/42, [19]). — He urges Schenker to procure some corresondence between Rosenthal and Rubenstein for publication in Die Zukunft; and he casts aspersion on Die Zeit.

• OJ 11/42, [22] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated December 20, 1894

  Harden rejects one of Schenker's submissions; he is resigned to Rosenthal's refusal to publish in Die Zukunft, but tells Schenker that Rosenthal has maligned him; he requests a referral via Gelber to someone, perhaps Viktor Adler, who would write about Austrian social relations for the journal.

• OJ 11/42, [23] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated May 30, 1895

  Harden tells Schenker that a submission from d'Albert would be welcomed; he encourages Schenker to send him a copy of a previously published lecture which he will consider publishing despite usual practise; and he asks whether Brahms or Rosenthal will contribute any Bülow letters to Die Zukunft.

• OJ 11/42, [24] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 29, 1895

  Harden suggests that Schenker make substantial revisions in an unidentified submission.

• OJ 11/42, [25] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated November 2, 1895

  Harden advises that one of Schenker's ideas for an article cannot be published because Harden's printer does not have musical notation.

• OJ 11/42, [26] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated March 27, 1896

  Harden welcomes Schenker's submission of a review of Karl Goldmark's Das Heimchen am Herd.

• OJ 11/42, [27] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated December 23, 1896

  Harden rejects the notion of publishing an article by Schenker anonymously; he agrees with Schenker that a frontal attack on modernism is necessary; he says he does not know Hofmannsthal's poetry, but hears he has great talent.

• OJ 11/42, [28] Handwritten postcard from Harden to Schenker, postmarked April 7, 1897

  Harden has already accepted an article.

• OJ 11/42, [29] Handwritten postcard from Harden to Schenker, dated April 18, 1897

  Harden asks whether Schenker's article on Brahms is still available.

• OJ 11/42, [30] Handwritten letter from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated December 2, 1897

  Harden rejects a submission by Schenker. — He tells him that his glowing review of Goldmark's Das Heimchen am Herd, which turned out to be a terrible work, has compromised the integrity of Die Zukunft; and he informs Schenker that a collaboration between the two of them is now virtually unthinkable.