-
OC 52/399-401 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 18, 1908
Hertzka complains at the embarrassment that Schenker has caused him over the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and proposes releasing the Table in two versions. — He proposes
that Schenker edit Book II of the Well-tempered Clavier in the manner of
Busoni.
-
WSLB 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22, 1908
Schenker agrees to the Instrumentations-Tabelle being published without his newly
written Introduction. — He declines the proposal to edit the Well-tempered Clavier Book II for
the new Akademie, offerin alternative suggestions and observations on Busoni's
editing.
-
WSLB 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [December 31, 1908 or January
1, 1909]
Schenker defends his Introduction to the Instrumentations-Tabelle and the
exclusion of the heckelphone.
-
WSLB 35 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), January 8, 1909
In a letter "ironic in tone" Schenker offers alternative editors for WTC Bk
II. He outlines the work that he has in hand, and regrets his unhappy experience with UE
over Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OJ 7/4, [50] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 26, 1909
Schenker has news to tell him regarding Richard Heuberger and Wilhelm Bopp;
reminds of forthcoming attendance at [a recital by] Artur Schnabel.
-
CA 96-98 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 26, 1909
Schenker raises again the splitting of Kontrapunkt into two half-volumes, or
even four installments. — He reports that his Beitrag zur Ornamentik has been adopted by the
Academy of Music, despite his being in a constant state of feud with all officialdom. — The
Academy's Director is a supporter of his theory. — Schenker outlines how earlier works of
his have become influential. — His Kontrapunkt is "eagerly awaited" and will be the "leading
work" on the subject; he argues the case for splitting the work on "psychological" and
"technical" grounds.
-
WSLB-Hds 94475 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, undated [probably early July
1909]
Schenker asks Seligmann to read an essay on Byron’s Manfred and, if he thinks
it worthy of publication, to send a letter of reference to one or other Viennese newspaper.
He also expresses his satisfaction at how his career is shaping: he has requested and
received generous fees for the editions he has prepared for Universal Edition, and his
theoretical writings for Cotta are also moving along.
-
OJ 5/35, [5] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated October 10,
1909
Schenker, on receipt of the score of a Rudorff choral work, praises its
textural clarity and melodic articulation, comparing them favorably to the writing of the
current generation. — He reports the success of his own recent theory works, and inroads
made into the Vienna Academy for Music and Performance Art.
-
WSLB 44 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 18, 1909
Schenker tells Hertzka of the Academy's plans to present a "historical"
concert of works edited by himself.
-
OJ 6/4, [48] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 22, 1909
Schenker proposes program order for forthcoming concert.
-
OJ 7/4, [56] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 3, 1909
Schenker reports a conversation with "G." re conducting the "Kreuzstab"
Cantata.
-
WSLB 53 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 15, 1910
Schenker advocates Moriz Violin's pamphlet "Über das sogenannte 'Continuo'"
for publication and explains its connection with a planned "historical
concert."
-
OJ 6/4, [52] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 23, 1910
Schenker gives Violin his reactions to Wilhelm Bopp's cancelation of a planned
"historical" concert of music by C.P.E. and J.S. Bach and Handel at the Akademie, and urges that
they adhere to their original plan.
-
OJ 9/18, [1] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated October
13, 1910
Bopp is pleased that matters have been settled, and hopes to make Schenker's
acquaintance.
-
WSLB 66/67 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE) + list of names, dated October 19,
1910
Schenker cancels their Thursday meeting. — He argues for sweeping changes to
the draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. — He defends his own free speech in the
face of Universal Edition's commercial interests. As with his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition, UE will never regret publishing the Ninth Symphony monograph. — He also lauds the
prospective editions of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas and volume of J. S. Bach
toccatas in a lofty vision for future publications. — He appends a list of recipients of
complimentary copies of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue.
-
WSLB 68 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 21, 1910
Schenker reports an encounter with Wilhelm Bopp.
-
OC 52/426 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 29, 1910
Hertzka notes Schenker's wish that his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition
be publicized as with "Erläuterungen" and asks Schenker to help him word a publicity notice.
— He wishes to finalize the contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie in person and to discuss
plans for the Beethoven Sonatas, on which he has spoken with Wilhelm Bopp with a view to a
grant from the Ministry of Education.
-
OC 52/60 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 5, 1910
Hertzka is pleased that Schenker's conversation with Wilhelm Bopp has gone
promisingly, and that Schenker is agreeable to the alternating publication of Beethoven and
Bach. — He is sending a new draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 70 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 7, 1910
Schenker suggests either a Hertzka-Bopp or a Hertzka-Schenker meeting to
discuss the combined release of the last Beethoven piano sonatas and Book 2 of the
Well-tempered Clavier.
-
OC 52/61 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 9, 1910
Hertzka will speak to Wilhelm Bopp to explore the position over the parallel
publication of Beethoven and Bach works, but admits there remains the thorny issue of the
need for a subsidy.
-
OJ 9/18, [2] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated January
14, 1911
Bopp regrets that he was unable to attend Schenker's chamber music
concert.
-
OJ 9/18, [3] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated March 24,
1911
Bopp asks for a meeting with Schenker.
-
OJ 9/18, [4] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated March 27,
1911
Bopp warns Schenker of his unavailability one day.
-
OJ 9/18, [5] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated May 16,
1911
Bopp sends Schenker an invitation to a concert.
-
WSLB 75 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 17, 1911
The manuscript of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie will be handed over complete
tomorrow. — Academy Director Wilhelm Bopp still favors the planned Bach-Beethoven editions
scheme, and Schenker awaits a summons from President Carl von Wiener.— Schenker argues the
case for UE to publish his arrangements of two C. P. E. Bach concertos and a work by
Handel.
-
OC 1A/1-2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik), dated May 30,
1911
Schenker has been unable to elicit any response from President [von
Wiener].
-
OC 1A/4-5 Handwritten letter, carbon copy, from Schenker to Hans Liebstoeckl, dated May 30,
1911
Schenker asks Liebstöckl to place an announcement [of a lecture series] in the
Illustrirtes Wiener Extrablatt.
-
WSLB 77 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 21, 1911
Schenker asks if he will receive galley-proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie
in time to take on vacation, and inquires as to his proposal for UE to publish the score of
the Ninth Symphony with original markings. — No summons to interview with Academy President
von Wiener, so he fears the worst for the planned Bach-Beethoven edition project. — Tirade
against von Wiener and the Academy's teachers.
-
OC 52/445 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 27, 1911
Hertzka explains that the proofs for Schenker's monograph Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie will not be ready before August. — He hopes that an agreement can be reached over
the Beethoven/Bach project.
-
WSLB 78 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 23, 1911
Schenker asks that a copy of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition be send
to Gottfried Galston. —He reports creation of his "Die Kunst des Vortrags" and "Kunst und
Kritik". —He is pleased that the Beethoven/Bach project may yet be realized, and justifies
his editorial stance with reference to Rodin and architecture, and suggests it might be
published in Germany as retribution against Bopp and Wiener. —He is working now on
Counterpoint II for Cotta.
-
WSLB 81 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 14,
1911
Schenker demands to know whether UE is interested in publishing his planned
edition of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas; -- Inquires how the proofs of Beethovens
neunte Sinfonie stand; And draws attention to the favorable sales of Kontrapunkt
1.
-
WSLB 80 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September [2]0,
1911
Schenker gives an ultimatum for Hertzka's decision on the Bach-Beethoven
plan.
-
WSLB 82 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 20,
1911
Schenker laments the withdrawal of Wilhelm Bopp from the planned
Bach-Beethoven edition project. -- He contests Hertzka's use of the term "Text-Kritik" to
characterize his Beethoven last five sonatas project.
-
WSLB 116 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 2, 1912
Schenker observes acidly that the Ninth Symphony score project has been
dropped. He asks [in the face of the threat of author correction cost demands] for an
honorarium for correcting the proofs of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. He demands
to know whether Hertzka is serious about the plan for an edition of the last five Beethoven
sonatas. He repeats his inquiry as to the number of copies of his Instrumentations-Tabelle,
2nd edition, that have so far been released.
-
OJ 11/17, [2] Handwritten letter from Eduard Gärtner to Schenker, dated July 14, 1912
Eduard Gärtner regrets that he is unable to help.
-
OJ 15/15,[I] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, [1912]
Weisse reports of progress with his string quintet; expresses his delight at
Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and speaks of "a bridge between art and
theory"; and expresses misgivings about Moriz Violin's pamphlet on the Vienna Academy. He
appeals to Schenker to give him piano lessons, and reports other matters.
-
WSLB 130 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 14, 1912
In the most aggressive letter yet on Hertzka's approach over honoraria and
correction costs, Schenker asserts that UE ought to subsidize his works through the takings
on the lucrative works of others. UE acquires Schenker's works for a fraction of their true
value, yet is held responsible for UE's costs. Schenker refuses to sign the draft contract
for his Die letzten fünf Sonaten Beethovens with an implied threat of
withdrawal.
-
WSLB 133 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [August 26,
1912]
Recounting the backstory of the move to found an [Austrian] organization of
musicians, and painting it as a rearguard action by performers against the dominance of Neue
freie Presse chief critic Julius Korngold and certain concert agents, Schenker reports an
approach from Hugo Heller in Germany, and presses Hertzka to reveal how committed he is to
the cause. — Remarking on the lack of coverage of music in [Austrian] newspapers, he
complains at the timid tone of Universal Edition's advertising of his own
works.
-
OJ 5/14, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to the Gustav Marchet (Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde), dated September 27, 1912
Schenker details to the President of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Gustav
Marchet, letters that he has received from the Society's General Secretary, Carl Lafite; he
lodges his complaint at the way in which he has been treated, which he considers impolite and
publicly demeaning, and withdraws his offer of lectures.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 12/9, [28] Typewritten letter and envelope from Karpath to Schenker, dated October 23,
1931
To Schenker's inquiry regarding Moriz Violin, Karpath gives information as to
how in the era of Perger and Bopp at the Vienna Conservatory professors and teachers were
addressed.