-
OJ 15/12, [5] Handwritten letter from Weinberger and Hertzka (Weinberger) to Schenker, dated October
6, 1903
Weinberger sends the newly copied orchestral parts of Syrian Dance No.
3.
-
OJ 15/12, [6] Handwritten letter from Weinberger and Hertzka (Weinberger) to Schenker, dated October
6, 1903
Copying of parts for Syrian Dances is delayed.
-
OC 52/383 Typewritten postcard (book slip) from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 26,
1908
UE welcomes Schenker's additions to the Beitrag zur Ornamentik and asks for
them as soon as possible.l
-
OC 52/384 Typewritten postcard (book slip) from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 26,
1908
UE asks for additions to Beitrag zur Ornamentik by the beginning of the
following week.
-
OC 52/385 Typewritten postcard (book slip) from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 1,
1908
UE stresses the urgency of supplying additional material for Beitrag zur
Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 1, 1908
Schenker asks for more time.
-
WSLB 4 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 22, 1908
Schenker promises material the next day, and extols the work's
structure.
-
OC 52/22 Typewritten postcard (book slip) from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 6,
1908
Hertzka threatens to re-issue the first edition of Ornamentik if revisions
don't arrive by the next day.
-
WSLB 3 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 9, 1908
Schenker promises more material next day, and extols the work.
-
CA 76 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 24, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde; — He seeks advice regarding Theodor Frimmel and the Beethoven-Jahrbuch,
explaining the delay on Kontrapunkt I.
-
WSLB 5 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 21, 1908
Schenker reports on progress with proofs and makes a suggestion.
-
WSLB 6 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 27, 1908
Because of an error in typesetting, Schenker needs to retain to two gatherings of
proofs.
-
WSLB 7 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 9, 1908
Schenker returns all remaining proofs of Ornamentik and calls for a third
proof.
-
WSLB 8 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 16, 1908
Schenker sends the text of his Foreword for Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 23, 1908
Schenker promises a list of people in German to receive complimentary copies of
Ornamentik, and a new proposal.
-
WSLB 10 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 26, 1908
Schenker accepts an offer and asks for a contract for the Instrumentation
Table.
-
OC 52/23 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 30, 1908
Hertzka asks Schenker to visit him to clear up a matter over
payment.
-
WSLB 11 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 30, 1908
Schenker asks for his honorarium to be sent promptly because of difficulties with
the post service to the Tyrol.
-
WSLB 12 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 22, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of Beitrag zur Ornamentik to be sent to Karl
Grunsky.
-
OC 52/397 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 11, 1908
Hertzka agrees to sending of complimentary copies of Beitrag zur Ornamentik. —
Gives progress report on Table of Instrumentation, predicting October
publication.
-
WSLB 13 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 13, 1908
Schenker reluctantly agrees to October for publishing the Instrumentation
Table.
-
WSLB 14 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 19, 1908
Schenker gives list of those to receive a copy of Beitrag zur
Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 15 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 22, 1908
Schenker regrets that printing of Beitrag zur Ornamentik is
delayed.
-
OC 52/24 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 25, 1908
Hertzka explains that the last-minute change to Beitrag zur Ornamentik
requested by Schenker would be exorbitantly expensive.
-
OC 52/25 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 26, 1908
Hertzka advises that the last-minute corrections for Beitrag zur Ornamentik
will be made by corrigenda sheet. — Complimentary copies will be going out in the next three
days, so Schenker should dispatch any personal notes to the recipients.
-
WSLB 16 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 26, 1908
Schenker favors a corrigenda sheet for last-minute corrections to his Beitrag zur
Ornamentik, and makes it a matter of conscience whether UE complies.
-
WSLB 18 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 27, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of Beitrag zur Ornamentik to be sent to Karl von
Wiener.
-
WSLB 17 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 27, 1908
Schenker reminds Hertzka to insert the corrigenda slip in the complimentary
copies going out to Schenker's recipients.
-
OJ 13/37, 2 Handwritten letter from Ernst Rudorff to Schenker, dated September 12,
1908
Rudorff thanks Schenker for a copy of his Beitrag zur Ornamentik, refers to
Beyschlag's Die Ornamentik der Musik, and expresses pleasure that he and Schenker are in
agreement.
-
WSLB 19 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 16, 1908
Schenker asks for a complimentary copy of his Beitrag zur Ornamentik to be sent
to Ludwig Karpath.
-
WSLB 20 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 28, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his C. P. E. Bach keyboard works to be sent to Julius
Röntgen. — He inquires about the corrigenda sheet for the Beitrag zur Ornamentik, and the
publication date of the Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
OC 52/26 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 29,
1908
Hertzka has instructed that Schenker's C. P. E. Bach edition be sent to Julius
Röntgen. — He explains the situation over the corrigenda for Beitrag zur Ornamentik. — The
Instrumentations-Tabelle will be published in the next two weeks.
-
WSLB 21 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 30, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his C. P. E. Bach Klavierwerke to be sent to Julius
Röntgen, and of the Beitrag zur Ornamentik, 2nd edition, to Daniel de Lange, since the work is a
rival to the newly-published Beyschlag Die Ornamentik der Musik. — He reports encountering
Willem Andriessen.
-
OC 52/27 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 1, 1908
Hertzka confirms arrangements over Beitrag zur Ornamentik, and asks for
proofing of the Foreword to the Instrumentationstabelle.
-
WSLB 22 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 2, 1908
Schenker thanks Hertzka, and will call on him soon.
-
WSLB 23 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 14, 1908
Lesson schedule prohibits visit to new UE office; Schenker asks for the matter to
be dealt with by correspondence.
-
OC 52/398 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 29, 1908
The Instrumentations-Tabelle is now published. — Hertzka is negotiating an
English translation of Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 31, 1908
The prospect of an English translation of Beitrag zur Ornamentik pleases
Schenker. — He wants to guide UE toward being a global enterprise. — Proofs of Counterpoint
[I] have started arriving from Cotta.
-
OC 52/444 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 7, 1908
Hertzka details the distribution of first copies of the
Instrumentations-Tabelle. — He makes a bid to publish Kontrapunkt.
-
WSLB 25 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 9, 1908
Schenker asks for copies of the Instrumentations-Tabelle to be sent to Violin
and Gärtner. — He has bought two copies of the Beitrag zur Ornamentik at the Gutmann music
store.
-
OC 52/28 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 11, 1908
Hertzka has had copies of the Instrumentations-Tabelle sent to Violin and
Gärtner. — He chides Schenker for buying copies at the Gutmann music store.
-
OC 52/29 Typewritten postcard (book slip) from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 23,
1908
The Instrumentations-Tabelle is going into a larger edition, and Hertzka asks
for a meeting.
-
WSLB 26 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 24, 1908
Schenker reluctantly agrees to a meeting.
-
WSLB 27 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 27,
1908
Schenker asks for a copy of the Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
WSLB 28 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 9,
1908
Schenker promises an "elaboration" regarding the
Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
OC 52/30 Typewritten postcard from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, date December 16,
1908
Ultimatum: if not delivered by Friday, "supplementary remarks" will be
omitted.
-
WSLB 29 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 16, 1908
Schenker assures Hertzka that his new material for the Instrumentations-Tabelle
will occupy only six pages. — He makes claims for the new material as an instrumentation
treatise, and suggests that the retail price might be raised accordingly.
-
WSLB 30 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 18, 1908
Schenker encloses some items [for the Instrumentations-Tabelle]. — In the
event that UE does not raise the retail price as he proposed in WSLB 29, he asks for his
introductory material back.
-
OC 52/399-401 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 18, 1908
Hertzka complains at the embarrassment that Schenker has caused him over the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and proposes releasing the Table in two versions. — He proposes
that Schenker edit Book II of the Well-tempered Clavier in the manner of
Busoni.
-
OC 52/31 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 21, 1908
Hertzka sends a copy of Mahillon's guide to instrumentation.
-
WSLB 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22, 1908
Schenker agrees to the Instrumentations-Tabelle being published without his newly
written Introduction. — He declines the proposal to edit the Well-tempered Clavier Book II for
the new Akademie, offerin alternative suggestions and observations on Busoni's
editing.
-
OC 52/32 Typewritten letter from Barbara Rothe (UE) to Schenker, dated December 23,
1908
Ms Rothe returns Schenker's introductory materials for the
Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
OJ 5/16, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 25,
1908
Schenker justifies his selection and treatment of instruments in the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, with acid comments about the English, and dismissal of French
contributions.
-
WSLB 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [December 31, 1908 or January
1, 1909]
Schenker defends his Introduction to the Instrumentations-Tabelle and the
exclusion of the heckelphone.
-
WSLB 34 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 4, 1909
Schenker returns proof and is willing to correct another.
-
OC 52/33 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 7, 1909
Hertzka hopes for detailed discussions with Schenker on the
Instrumentations-Tabelle and the Well-tempered Clavier proposal.
-
WSLB 35 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), January 8, 1909
In a letter "ironic in tone" Schenker offers alternative editors for WTC Bk
II. He outlines the work that he has in hand, and regrets his unhappy experience with UE
over Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OC 52/919
Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 11, 1909
Hertzka still hopes to persuade Schenker to take on editing the Well-tempered
Clavier Book II.
-
WSLB 36 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), January 29, 1909
Schenker requests two copies of his Instrumenten-Tabelle, one for Alphons
Rothschild.
-
OC 52/35 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 30, 1909
Copies of the Instrumentations-Tabelle will be delived in three days. Hertzka
calls for a meeting.
-
OC 52/402 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 21, 1909
Hertzka raises several possibilities for amplifying the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and calls for a meeting.
-
WSLB 37 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), March 28, 1909
Schenker suggests a meeting at Robert Brünauer's home.
-
OC 52/36 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 29, 1909
Hertzka welcomes the prospect of a discussion at the home of Robert
Brüunauer.
-
OC 52/920 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 1, 1909
Hertzka summarizes the discussion earlier that day.
-
WSLB 38 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 2, 1909
Schenker thanks Hertzka for his latest letter.
-
CA 96-98 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 26, 1909
Schenker raises again the splitting of Kontrapunkt into two half-volumes, or
even four installments. — He reports that his Beitrag zur Ornamentik has been adopted by the
Academy of Music, despite his being in a constant state of feud with all officialdom. — The
Academy's Director is a supporter of his theory. — Schenker outlines how earlier works of
his have become influential. — His Kontrapunkt is "eagerly awaited" and will be the "leading
work" on the subject; he argues the case for splitting the work on "psychological" and
"technical" grounds.
-
OJ 6/4, [46] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 22, 1909
Schenker reports a successful deal with Hertzka at Universal Edition, and refers
to monetary matters between them.
-
WSLB 39 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), June 23, 1909
Schenker asks Hertzka to send him two editions of the Bach Chromatic Fantasy
& Fugue that are unknown to him.
-
OC 52/422 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 24, 1909
Hertzka confirms the agreed edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue, and
will send the required editions.
-
WSLB 40 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 26, 1909
Schenker asks for the Röntgen edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue to
be sent to him.
-
WSLB 41 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 1, 1909
Schenker asks for the three previously requested editions to be sent as soon as
possible so as to arrive before he departs for vacation.— He also asks for Richard Stöhr's
Harmonielehre.
-
WSLB-Hds 94475 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, undated [probably early July
1909]
Schenker asks Seligmann to read an essay on Byron’s Manfred and, if he thinks
it worthy of publication, to send a letter of reference to one or other Viennese newspaper.
He also expresses his satisfaction at how his career is shaping: he has requested and
received generous fees for the editions he has prepared for Universal Edition, and his
theoretical writings for Cotta are also moving along.
-
OC 52/37 Typewritten postcard from UE (unidentified signatory) to Schenker, dated September
20, 1909
Hertzka is currently away.
-
WSLB 42 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 20, 1909
The Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue is ready to deliver. Proposes a meeting to
discuss printing.
-
OC 52/38 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 25,
1909
Hertzka asks for a visit from Schenker.
-
WSLB 43 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 2, 1909
Schenker asks for a copy of Beitrag zur Ornamentik to be sent to Fritz
Wahle.
-
OC 52/39 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 15, 1909
Hertzka encloses a contract for the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition for
signature and return.
-
WSLB 44 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 18, 1909
Schenker tells Hertzka of the Academy's plans to present a "historical"
concert of works edited by himself.
-
OC 52/40 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 20, 1909
UE will search for the Handel organ concerto score.
-
OC 52/41 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 26, 1909
Hertzka asks for a meeting to discuss the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition.
-
WSLB 45 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 27,
1909
Schenker is unable to make a meeting before November 2.
-
WSLB 46 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 30, 1909
Schenker warns that he may be delayed or unable to attend the agreed meeting
because of a dental appointment.
-
OC 52/42 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 5, 1909
Hertzka insists that a face-to-face meeting is necessary.
-
WSLB 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 9, 1909
Schenker resists attending a meeting with Hertzka and von Wöß regarding the
printing of his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue; asserts his rights as an
author to control over his own material; and makes claims for the introduction to his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, which was not accepted for inclusion in 1908
reprinting.
-
OC 52/43 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 10, 1909
Hertzka attempts to reassure Schenker that the topics he wanted to discuss did
not involve "changes", only technical matters.
-
WSLB 48 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), November 12, 1909
Schenker thanks Hertzka for the latest information on the Chromatic Fantasy
& Fugue.
-
WSLB 49 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 20,
1909
Schenker asks for proofs of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition over the
Christmas holiday.
-
OC 52/44 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 21, 1909
Hertzka regrets that since printing has not yet begun Schenker cannot have
proofs over Christmas; — He asks for a meeting during the holidays.
-
WSLB 50 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22,
1909
Schenker agrees to visit Hertzka, but stipulates no
criticism.
-
OC 52/390 Handwritten note by Schenker, undated [probably 1909]
Schenker records the refusal of his request for increased honorarium for vol.
II of Handel Organ Concertos, maintaining that his work comstituted more that mere
"arrangements."
-
WSLB 51 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 6, 1910
Schenker complains that others have been allowed to see his Chromatic Fantasy
& Fugue, whereas he has not yet received proofs.
-
WSLB 52 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 7, 1910
Schenker's Chromatic Fantasy edition is an exception: other Bach works can be
published with less editorial detail. — He accuses Universal Edition of favoring
"anti-musical music." — With heavy irony, he suggests handing other Bach editing work to
others so as to promote UE's commercial interests.
-
OC 52/424 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated February 7, 1910
While informing Schenker that his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
has not yet gone to the printers/engravers, Hertzka rebuts Schenker's allegation that he has
shown the edition to Godowsky, Robert and others. He raises the possibility of Schenker's
editing other works by J. S. Bach.
-
OC 52/45 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated February 11, 1910
Refuting Schenker's accusations, particularly that UE emphasizes "anti-musical
music," Hertzka says he will print the proposed Bach works as Schenker suggests, and informs
him that the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition will go to press in early
March.
-
WSLB 53 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 15, 1910
Schenker advocates Moriz Violin's pamphlet "Über das sogenannte 'Continuo'"
for publication and explains its connection with a planned "historical
concert."
-
OC 52/46 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 11, 1910
Hertzka asks Schenker to return a score to the UE Archive.
-
OC 52/47 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 12, 1910
Proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition will not be available by
Easter [March 27]. Hertzka hopes Schenker will be able to correct them in
April.
-
WSLB 54 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 12, 1910
Schenker asks for proofs of his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
so that he can correct them over the Easter holidays.
-
WSLB 55 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 5, 1910
Schenker presses again for proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition, so as to coordinate them with his work on Kontrapunkt 1.
-
OC 52/48 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 9, 1910
There is now no hope of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition being
available for proof-correcting by the middle of April, hence UE may be forced to send the
work to Breitkopf & Härtel. — Hertzka asks for a report on other projects under
discussion.
-
WSLB 56 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 10, 1910
Schenker accuses Hertzka of failing to keep his word over delivery of proofs
of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition, quoting Hertzka's words from a previous
letter.
-
OC 52/49 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 11, 1910
Hertzka is unable to return, as requested, Schenker's copy of a volume of the
Bach Gesellschaft Edition [vol. 36], and offers an alternative. — He denies having promised
Schenker that the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition would go to engraving in the
Spring.
-
WSLB 57 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 11, 1910
Schenker asks for the return of his copy of the Bach Gesellschaft edition vol.
36, which he needs for teaching purposes.
-
WSLB 58 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 12, 1910
Schenker thanks Hertzka for his help
-
WSLB 59 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 16, 1910
Schenker reasserts his claim that his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition
will be seriously delayed. — He urges Hertzka to give more attention to his
work.
-
OC 52/50 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated April 19, 1910
Hertzka hopes to have the galley-proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition very soon.
-
WSLB 60 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 20, 1910
Schenker asks that proofs of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition reach
him by May 1, and outlines a plan for production of the work. He will not be able to correct
them during the summer.
-
OC 52/51 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 2, 1910
Hertzka notifies Schenker that the proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition are about to be delivered.
-
WSLB 61 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 3, 1910
Schenker acknowledges receipt of the first proofs his Chromatic Fantasy &
Fugue edition, and comments on the high number of errors.
-
WSLB 62 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 10, 1910
Schenker reports that he is busy correcting proofs of his Chromatic Fantasy
& Fugue edition, and hopes to have returned them by the end of June, and even to correct
and approve the second proofs if available.
-
OC 52/52 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 20, 1910
Hertzka acknowledges return of first proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy &
Fugue edition, and promises to look out the contracts Schenker has requested.
-
WSLB 63 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 8, 1910
Schenker has dispatched the second proof of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition from Karerpass to Vienna, and outlines his travel plans for the remaining
summer.
-
WSLB 64 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 10, 1910
Schenker asks for one copy of the Chromatic Fantasy &
Fugue.
-
OC 52/425 Typewritten letter from UE to Schenker, dated October 14, 1910
UE is transferring Schenker's second honorarium for the Chromatic Fantasy
& Fugue edition, and enclose the publisher's blurb for the monograph Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony.
-
WSLB 65 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 17, 1910
Schenker acknowledges the second honorarium for Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
and will appear at Hertzka's office on October 20.
-
WSLB 66/67 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE) + list of names, dated October 19,
1910
Schenker cancels their Thursday meeting. — He argues for sweeping changes to
the draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. — He defends his own free speech in the
face of Universal Edition's commercial interests. As with his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition, UE will never regret publishing the Ninth Symphony monograph. — He also lauds the
prospective editions of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas and volume of J. S. Bach
toccatas in a lofty vision for future publications. — He appends a list of recipients of
complimentary copies of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue.
-
WSLB 68 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 21, 1910
Schenker reports an encounter with Wilhelm Bopp.
-
OC 52/426 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 29, 1910
Hertzka notes Schenker's wish that his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition
be publicized as with "Erläuterungen" and asks Schenker to help him word a publicity notice.
— He wishes to finalize the contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie in person and to discuss
plans for the Beethoven Sonatas, on which he has spoken with Wilhelm Bopp with a view to a
grant from the Ministry of Education.
-
WSLB 69/71 Handwritten letter + inclosure from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 1,
1910
Text of flyer for Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition, with covering note
discussing plan for last five Beethoven piano sonatas in combination with Well-tempered
Clavier, Book 2.
-
OC 52/60 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 5, 1910
Hertzka is pleased that Schenker's conversation with Wilhelm Bopp has gone
promisingly, and that Schenker is agreeable to the alternating publication of Beethoven and
Bach. — He is sending a new draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 70 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 7, 1910
Schenker suggests either a Hertzka-Bopp or a Hertzka-Schenker meeting to
discuss the combined release of the last Beethoven piano sonatas and Book 2 of the
Well-tempered Clavier.
-
OC 52/61 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 9, 1910
Hertzka will speak to Wilhelm Bopp to explore the position over the parallel
publication of Beethoven and Bach works, but admits there remains the thorny issue of the
need for a subsidy.
-
WSLB 72 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 11, 1910
Schenker asks for copies of his Beitrag zur Ornamentik and Chromatische
Fantasie & Fuge to be sent to Wanda Ladowska.
-
WSLB 73 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 17, 1910
Schenker has received gratitude from abroad for his edition of the Chromatic
Fantasy & Fugue, and asks for a copy to be sent to Otto Vrieslander. — He accuses the
Viennese of hostility and intellectual theft.
-
WSLB 74 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 19, 1910
Affected by his elderly mother's illness, Schenker asks for an advance of 500
Kronen on account of his manuscript, due for imminent delivery.
-
OC 52/62 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Moriz Violin, dated January 19,
1911
Hertzka regrets having missed Moriz Violin's concert, and asks for a
list of recipients for his booklet Ueber das Continuo.
-
OC 52/70 Postal receipt for item from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), postmarked April 30,
1911
Postal receipt for item of April 30, 1911 sent to UE.
-
WSLB 75 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 17, 1911
The manuscript of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie will be handed over complete
tomorrow. — Academy Director Wilhelm Bopp still favors the planned Bach-Beethoven editions
scheme, and Schenker awaits a summons from President Carl von Wiener.— Schenker argues the
case for UE to publish his arrangements of two C. P. E. Bach concertos and a work by
Handel.
-
WSLB 76 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 19, 1911
Schenker acknowledges a package from UE..
-
OC 1A/1-2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik), dated May 30,
1911
Schenker has been unable to elicit any response from President [von
Wiener].
-
WSLB 77 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 21, 1911
Schenker asks if he will receive galley-proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie
in time to take on vacation, and inquires as to his proposal for UE to publish the score of
the Ninth Symphony with original markings. — No summons to interview with Academy President
von Wiener, so he fears the worst for the planned Bach-Beethoven edition project. — Tirade
against von Wiener and the Academy's teachers.
-
OC 52/445 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 27, 1911
Hertzka explains that the proofs for Schenker's monograph Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie will not be ready before August. — He hopes that an agreement can be reached over
the Beethoven/Bach project.
-
WSLB 78 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 23, 1911
Schenker asks that a copy of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition be send
to Gottfried Galston. —He reports creation of his "Die Kunst des Vortrags" and "Kunst und
Kritik". —He is pleased that the Beethoven/Bach project may yet be realized, and justifies
his editorial stance with reference to Rodin and architecture, and suggests it might be
published in Germany as retribution against Bopp and Wiener. —He is working now on
Counterpoint II for Cotta.
-
OC 52/63 Typewritten postcard from UE to Schenker, dated July 27, 1911
UE confirms sending Schenker's edition of the Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue to
Gottfried Galston. Hertzka is on holiday, and will reply on his return.
-
WSLB 81 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 14,
1911
Schenker demands to know whether UE is interested in publishing his planned
edition of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas; -- Inquires how the proofs of Beethovens
neunte Sinfonie stand; And draws attention to the favorable sales of Kontrapunkt
1.
-
OC 52/65 Typewritten postcard from UE to Schenker, dated September 14, 1911
Emil Hertka is away on business; Schenker should wait a day or
two.
-
OC 52/492 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 19,
1911
UE cannot proceed with the Beethoven last five sonatas project absent a grant.
Whereas the larger German music publishers might be able to undertake such a work, UE is
still too young to have the investment. -- Proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie will be
available in the Fall, owing to the delay in Schenker's delivery of his manuscript. --
Hertzka expresses delight at the sales of Kontrapunkt 1.
-
WSLB 80 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September [2]0,
1911
Schenker gives an ultimatum for Hertzka's decision on the Bach-Beethoven
plan.
-
WSLB 82 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 20,
1911
Schenker laments the withdrawal of Wilhelm Bopp from the planned
Bach-Beethoven edition project. -- He contests Hertzka's use of the term "Text-Kritik" to
characterize his Beethoven last five sonatas project.
-
WSLB 83 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 28, 1911
Schenker hotly contests Hertzka's allegation that he delivered the material
for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie late, and details the pre-history of the
project.
-
OC 52/66 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 31, 1911
Schenker will receive the [first] proofs of his Beethovens neunte Sinfonie "in
the course of November."
-
OJ 8/1, [16] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 7,
1911
Schenker urges Violin to request Hertzka send a copy of his Continuo
essay.
-
WSLB 84 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 19, 1911
Schenker offers UE an arrangement of the Mozart A major piano concerto,
arguing the case for its publication despite existing editions. -- He is impatiently
awaiting proofs of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
OC 52/67 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 24, 1911
Hertzka is unable to take up Schenker's offer of an arrangement of a Mozart
piano concerto. -- Proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie are expected any
day.
-
WSLB 85 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), postmarked November 25,
1911
Schenker corrects Hertzka's misapprehension about his proposed arrangement of
a Mozart piano concerto for two pianos four hands. -- He suggests Breitkopf are stringing
Hertzka along.
-
WSLB 86 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 30, 1911
Schenker acknowledges receipt of the first galley-proofs of Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie and asks for return of his copy of Grove's book on the Beethoven
symphonies.
-
OC 52/68 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 1, 1911
The printers query the absence of "signatures" from music examples in the
manuscript of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
OC 52/69 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 1, 1911
Hertkza encloses a letter from Eugen d'Albert and is having the requested book
returned to Schenker.
-
WSLB 87 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 3, 1911
Schenker explains that the music examples without [key] signatures in
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie are direct transcriptions from Beethoven's sketch materials. --
He approves the use of a quotation from a D'Albert letter for publicity
purposes.
-
OC 52/71 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 4, 1911
Hertkza acknowledges Schenker's explanation of music examples without [key]
signatures, and suggests an explanatory footnote; corrected proofs should be returned to
UE.
-
WSLB 88 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 6, 1911
Schenker gives instructions as to how measure number should be displayed in
the analysis sections of his monograph Beethoven's neunte Sinfonie.
-
OC 52/73 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 20, 1911
Hertkza remarks that the corrected proofs of gathering 3 of Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie have significant alterations and additions, the costs of which will be passed on to
Schenker.
-
WSLB 89 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22, 1911
Schenker refutes Hertzka's accusation of "heavy corrections," and his threat
to pass the costs on to him.
-
WSLB 90 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 1, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and draws
attention to errors on the part of the typesetters.
-
OC 52/74 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 2, 1912
Hertkza sends page-proofs of gathering 3, and asks for return of galley-proofs
and the manuscript of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 91 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 4, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and expresses
dismay at the inaccurate work of the typesetters, notably in type-size, marginal numbers,
and alignment within figures.
-
OC 52/75 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 5, 1912
Hertkza encloses a letter from Breitkopf.
-
WSLB 92 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 10, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected and a letter
from Breitkopf &Härtel.
-
WSLB 93 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 11, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected; he points out
with labored sarcasm that the printers have omitted the title-pages of each of the four
movements, and suggests how this might be rectified.
-
OC 52/76 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 12, 1912
Hertkza notifies Schenker of the impending delivery of page-proofs of
Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie, takes note of Schenker's recent comments, and asks him to
consider making structural diagrams for movements 2-4.
-
WSLB 94 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 15, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie with imprimatur. -- He
conditionally accepts Hertzka's proposal that he create structural diagrams for movements 2
to 4, giving his justification for intially providing only that for the first
movement.
-
OC 52/78 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 26, 1912
Hertzka notifies Schenker of the impending delivery of page-proofs of his
Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie monograph and asks for speedy return of previous
galley-proofs.
-
WSLB 95 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 28, 1912
Schenker returns page-proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie, granting
imprimatur providing one problem can be overcome.
-
WSLB 96 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 3, 1912
Schenker returns page-proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie and the structural
diagram for movement 2.
-
OC 52/79 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated February 6, 1912
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of the formal diagram of movement 2 for, and
gathering 8 of the Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie monograph, and has sent galley-proofs of
gatherings 5 and 6 to Schenker for imprimatur.
-
WSLB 97 Handwritten express postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 7,
1912
Schenker complains at the printers' disregard of his earlier words. He asks
for assurance that he will receive a complete set of proofs to check the cross-citations of
page-numbers.
-
WSLB 98 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 4, 1912
Schenker returns page-proofs for gatherings 10 and 11 of Beethovens Neunte
Sinfonie and the formal diagram for movement 3.
-
OC 52/432 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 7, 1912
Hertzka invites Schenker to meet him to discuss the plan for an edition of the
Beethoven Ninth Symphony score and other matters.
-
WSLB 99 Handwritten express postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 9,
1912
Schenker accepts Hertzka's invitation to a meeting.
-
OC 52/81 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 9, 1912
Hertzka agrees to the suggested meeting time and place; second proofs of
gatherings 9 and 10 are being dispatched to Schenker.
-
WSLB 100 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 13, 1912
Schenker proposes that his book Beethovens neunte Sinfonie and the edited full
orchestral score be published as separate volumes, and promises the additional revised text
of his Instrumentations-Tabelle the next day.
-
WSLB 101 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 14, 1912
Schenker sends the four new paragraphs for the 1912 edition of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
OC 52/82 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 15, 1912
Hertzka gives Schenker assurances on the arrival of further
gatherings.
-
WSLB 102 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 17, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of gather 16 of his monograph Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie.
-
OC 52/403 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 18, 1912
Second proofs of gatherings 11 and 12 of Schenker's monograph Beethovens
neunte Sinfonie are on their way to him. Hertzka issues a warning on correction costs.
Payment has been authorized for the additional material for his
Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
WSLB 103 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 19, 1912
Schenker responds combatively to Hertzka's warning about correction
costs.
-
OC 52/83 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 20, 1912
Hertzka suggests a fold-out for a particularly large music
example.
-
WSLB 104 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 22, 1912
Schenker agrees with a suggestion for handling an oversize music
example.
-
OC 52/84 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 26, 1912
Gatherings are received and others sent out. Hertzka reiterates his demand for
the complete manuscript and outstanding first proofs.
-
WSLB 105 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 28, 1912
Schenker will send the complete manuscript only on receipt of written
assurance that it be returned to him later -- He speaks of being not only to "procreator" of
his work but also "a manufacturer, hence a busieness man." -- He implies his refusal to pay
any correction costs. He points out a placement error in gathering 16.
-
OC 52/85 Typewritten letter from B. Rothe (UE) to Schenker, dated April 1, 1912
Miss Rothe assures Schenker that his manuscript of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie
will be returned to him after use, and asks for it to be sent as well as any other proofs in
Schenker's hands.
-
WSLB 106 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 14, 1912
Schenker returns proofs for his Instrumentations-Tabelle and Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie, and prelims and Foreword of the latter, with comments. He raises the issue of
English and French translations for the monograph.
-
WSLB 107 Handwritten express postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 16,
1912
Schenker asks for confirmation that UE has received the Preface to his
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
OC 52/87 Typewritten express postcard from UE to Schenker, dated April 16, 1912
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of the Preface to Beethovens neunte
Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 108 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 19, 1912
Schenker returns proofs for his Instrumentations-Tabelle and five gatherings
of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie, pointing out a serious error. He also responds on the title
of the latter.
-
WSLB 109 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 29, 1912
Schenker sends first and second proofs with comments.
-
WSLB 110 Handwritten express postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 5,
1912
Schenker is unable to comply with Hertzka's invitation on account of teaching
commitments.
-
OC 52/433 Handwritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated May 7, 1912
Hertzka explains the reason for his need to see Schenker in person: it
concerns the numbering of bars in the second movement of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony in
Schenker's monograph on that work, and the planned edition of the score of the symphony; but
Hertzka will be away for up to ten days.
-
WSLB 112 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 11, 1912
Schenker responds to Hertzka's suggestions on bar numbering in the Scherzo of
Beethoven's Ninth Symphony as reflected in Schenker's monograph and the proposed new edition
of the score, and offers a counter-proposal; he also responds on the formal terminology. --
He inquires as to the number of copies of the new edition of the Niloff
Instrumentations-Tabelle so far released.
-
WSLB 111 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 16, 1912
Schenker points to inconsistent usage of "Sinfonie" and "Symphonie" in the
type-setting of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie and suggests adherence to the
former; he submits the Foreword, and asks for one copy of each of his previous UE
publications.
-
WSLB 113 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 18, 1912
Schenker asks to see the entire volume of his monograph on Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony again for a final check, and urges that the work be published in time for the
Vienna Music Festival Week, and that UE be advertizing the book now in
Germany.
-
WSLB-Hds 94477 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated May 22, 1912
Schenker congratulates Seligmann on the recent exhibition of his paintings. He
is about to send him a copy of his Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony and asks him to read the
section on the secondary literature and consider whether the same might be applied to the
literature on painting.
-
WSLB 114 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 24, 1912
Schenker puts another proposal on how to present the bar numbering of the
Scherzo of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony in the text and diagram of his
monograph.
-
OC 52/434 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, with holograph insertions, dated
May 28, 1912
Hertzka invites Schenker to his home for a discussion of the monograph
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 115 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated May 29, 1912
Schenker accepts Hertzka's invitation to his home on June 1, and declares his
willingness to cooperate. He acknowledges receipt of a set of his previous UE
publications.
-
OC 52/435 Typewritten postcard from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated May 31, 1912
Hertzka asks Schenker to collect him from his office on June 1 for their
meeting.
-
WSLB 116 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 2, 1912
Schenker observes acidly that the Ninth Symphony score project has been
dropped. He asks [in the face of the threat of author correction cost demands] for an
honorarium for correcting the proofs of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. He demands
to know whether Hertzka is serious about the plan for an edition of the last five Beethoven
sonatas. He repeats his inquiry as to the number of copies of his Instrumentations-Tabelle,
2nd edition, that have so far been released.
-
WSLB 117 Handwritter letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 3, 1912
Schenker returns the [complete] proof copy of his Beethovens neunte Sinfonie
with corrections. He asks about the placement of the Table of Contents in the
volume.
-
OC 52/427 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 3, 1912
Hertzka addresses Schenker's request for an honorarium for correcting proofs
of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie; he counters that the total author corrections have run to 600
Kronen. He is sending the volume to the printers today. -- He commits in principle to the
editing of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas [Erläuterungsausgabe], but on the basis of
the Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue sales he cannot accede to Schenker's demands; he makes a
counter-proposal.
-
WSLB 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), date June 4, 1912
Schenker urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner in connection with the planned
Organization. He reiterates his demands regarding payment for the planned last five
Beethoven sonata edition, specifying the sums, and disputes Hertzka's
counterargument.
-
OC 52/404 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 4, 1912
UE sends 100 Kronen in payment for the Instrumentations-Tabelle 2nd
edition.
-
WSLB 119 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 5, 1912
Schenker inquires about the print-run and retail cost of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and points out an inconsistency in the edition number. He asks for
clarity on a payment he has just received, stressing his probity.
-
OC 52/493 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 8, 1912
Hertzka makes a firm proposition on payment for the Beethoven last five
sonatas, and seeks clarification on contact with Dr. Harpner.
-
WSLB 120 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 9, 1912
A long letter, biblical in tone, in which Schenker prophesies that a "Flood of
the moderns" will come to pass, and in Noah's ark his works will "occupy the place of
honor," and that a "bright new light" will establish Universal Edition as superior to the
German publishers. He accepts Hertzka's terms for the Beethoven Last Five Sonatas edition
for now. He again urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner regarding the planned Organization of
Creative and Performing Musicians. He encourages Hertzka to deal more generously with Hans
Weisse.
-
OC 52/406 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 10, 1912
Hertzka explains UE's recent 100 Kronen payment, and answers Schenker's
question on the edition number and retail price of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle.
-
WSLB 121 Handwritter letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 13[?], 1912
Schenker reports the state of play [on the Organisation] and again urges
Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner.
-
WSLB 123 Handwritter letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 24, 1912
Schenker reports improved agreement among the supporters of the planned
Organization. -- He asks for his contract for his edition of Op. 109, and asks yet again for
the fee for correcting proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
OJ 15/16, [5] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 27, 1912
Weisse asks to be informed of Schenker's contact with Emil Hertzka; Mahler's
Ninth Symphony is "filth"; Schenker's Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie has just appeared and he will
study it.
-
WSLB 124 Handwritter letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 27, 1912
Schenker asks for copies of his Beethovens neunte Sinfonie to be sent to
himself and others. -- He reports that the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde has invited him to
teach.
-
OC 52/90 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 28, 1912
Hertzka is unable to complete the contract for Die letzten fünf Sonaten
Beethovens this week; he will send it next week.
-
WSLB 125 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 5, 1912
Schenker provides his summer address and looks forward to working on the
musicians' organization when be returns.
-
WSLB 126 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 11, 1912
Schenker has referred a textual anomaly in Beethoven Op. 109 to Ernst Rudorff,
and asks for the contract for Die letzten fünf Sonaten to be sent to him.
-
WSLB 127 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 12, 1912
Schenker asks for a copy of his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue, to
forward to a "colleague."
-
OC 52/91 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated July 13, 1912
The Chromatic Fantasy edition and Ninth Symphony monograph will be sent as
requested; the [contract for the] Letzen fünf Sonaten edition will be dealt
with.
-
OJ 11/17, [2] Handwritten letter from Eduard Gärtner to Schenker, dated July 14, 1912
Eduard Gärtner regrets that he is unable to help.
-
OC 52/92 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated July 19, 1912
Hertzka sends the draft contract for Die letzten fünf Sonaten, and will deal
with the Musicians' Organization in the fall.
-
WSLB 128 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 21, 1912
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie: Schenker justifies the higher number of proof
corrections and reiterates his demand for a supplementary honorarium. -- Die letzten fünf
Sonaten: he objects to a clause in the draft contract concerning correction costs, and
emphasizes the expenses that he himself is incurring in preparing the
edition.
-
OC 52/94 Handwritten and typewritten postcard from UE to Schenker, dated July 23,
1912
Hertzka is out of town.
-
OJ 15/15,[I] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, [1912]
Weisse reports of progress with his string quintet; expresses his delight at
Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and speaks of "a bridge between art and
theory"; and expresses misgivings about Moriz Violin's pamphlet on the Vienna Academy. He
appeals to Schenker to give him piano lessons, and reports other matters.
-
WSLB 129 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 6, 1912
Schenker informs Hertzka that he has been approached by the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde with a view to his teaching a course at the Society's new "free high school"
beginning in October, and inquires whether Hertzka will meet his demands so that he can
proceed with Die letzen fünf Sonaten Beethovens.
-
OC 52/437 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 12, 1912
Die letzten fünf Sonaten: Hertzka finds Schenker's suggested rewording too
general; Beethovens neunte Sinfonie: Hertzka will pay the supplementary fee demanded by
Schenker, but only after 500 copies have been sold.
-
WSLB 130 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 14, 1912
In the most aggressive letter yet on Hertzka's approach over honoraria and
correction costs, Schenker asserts that UE ought to subsidize his works through the takings
on the lucrative works of others. UE acquires Schenker's works for a fraction of their true
value, yet is held responsible for UE's costs. Schenker refuses to sign the draft contract
for his Die letzten fünf Sonaten Beethovens with an implied threat of
withdrawal.
-
OC 52/95-96 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 22, 1912
Die letzten fünf Sonaten: Hertzka backs down on the contested contract clause;
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie: Hertzka refuses to budge on his proposal for the supplementary
honorarium, but assures Schenker of his good will toward him.
-
WSLB 132 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 25, 1912
Schenker returns the contract for Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven
signed. — Proclaiming "Ex Austria lux," he says that Austria's tradition from Haydn to
Brahms and Dvořák[sic] will now be followed by Schenker's "explanation" (Aufklärung) of that
tradition, which will spawn a new generation of composers superior to the present
"cacophony," with Universal Edition as the agent of that "rebuilding of tonal music" (Aufbau
der Tonkunst). — He alludes to the possibility of teaching for the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde's proposed "Hochschule." — He prompts Hertzka to act on the Organization of
Musicians project in the fall.
-
WSLB 133 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [August 26,
1912]
Recounting the backstory of the move to found an [Austrian] organization of
musicians, and painting it as a rearguard action by performers against the dominance of Neue
freie Presse chief critic Julius Korngold and certain concert agents, Schenker reports an
approach from Hugo Heller in Germany, and presses Hertzka to reveal how committed he is to
the cause. — Remarking on the lack of coverage of music in [Austrian] newspapers, he
complains at the timid tone of Universal Edition's advertising of his own
works.
-
OC 52/97 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 28, 1912
In an important letter on the plan for an organization of composers and
concert musicians, Hertzka declares himself willing to be involved, sets out a timetable,
issues a caution, and raises the issue of finance; in dealings with Hugo Heller, UE's and
his own name should not yet be divulged.
-
WSLB 134 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 7, 1912
Schenker asks for the first installment of his honorarium for Die letzten fünf
Sonaten Beethovens to be sent, now that he is back in Vienna. — He reports on the
Organization plan, and on progress on Op. 109. — He reiterates his claim for a supplementary
honorarium for proof correction of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 135 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 7, 1912
Schenker insistently reiterates his request for the first half honorarium for
Die letzten fünf Sonaten Beethovens. — He alludes to an announcement by the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde.
-
OC 52/98 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 16,
1912
In sending the first installment of Schenker's honorarium for the Last Five
Sonatas of Beethoven, Hertzka apologizes for its delay. — He asks for a meeting about the
Organization.
-
WSLB 136 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 21,
1912
Schenker reports the stormy end to the prospect of his teaching in the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde's "Hochschule."
-
WSLB 137 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 24,
1912
Schenker reports developments on the Organization front and also the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde's "Hochschule" front.
-
OC 52/100 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 27,
1912
Hertzka has tried and failed to telephone Dr. Harpner because he is
ill.
-
OJ 5/14, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to the Gustav Marchet (Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde), dated September 27, 1912
Schenker details to the President of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Gustav
Marchet, letters that he has received from the Society's General Secretary, Carl Lafite; he
lodges his complaint at the way in which he has been treated, which he considers impolite and
publicly demeaning, and withdraws his offer of lectures.
-
WSLB 138 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 30,
1912
Ludwig Karpath has complained at not having received a review copy of
Schenker's Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. — Schenker prompts Hertzka on the often demanded
supplementary honorarium for proof correction of the monograph.
-
OC 52/102 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 3, 1912
Hertzka gives his reaction to a letter from Hugo Heller to
Schenker.
-
WSLB 139 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 3, 1912
Schenker forwards a letter from Hugo Heller [from Germany] and asks how he
should handle the matter [of the proposed Organisation], pointing out that a comparable
movement has already be launched in Germany.
-
WSLB 140 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October14, 1912
Dr. Harpner is recovered; Schenker hopes to see Hugo Heller shortly. -- He
prompts yet again for the "supplementary honorarium."
-
OC 52/103 Handwritten and typewritten postcard from UE to Schenker, dated October 15,
1912
Hertzka is out of town.
-
OC 52/104 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 23, 1912
Hertzka will speak with Harpner next week.
-
WSLB 141 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 7, 1912
In a satyrical letter, Schenker asks Hertzka to make up his mind about the
compositions of Hans Weisse submitted for publication.
-
OC 52/105 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 9, 1912
Hertzka returns the compositions by Hans Weisse submitted for consideration,
giving reasons. — He has to stand aside for a time from the "Alliance" [recte Organization]
on health grounds.
-
OJ 13/29, [8] Handwritten letter from Rosenthal to Schenker, dated November 10, 1912
Rosenthal apologizes for mishandling of ticket issue, and raises the matter of
forming an artists' organization.
-
WSLB 142 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 10, 1912
Schenker responds to Hertzka's claim of overwork and strained nerves,
remarking that everybody [on the matter of the proposed Organization] is "holding back,"
even he himself.
-
WSLB 143 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 27[–28],
1912
Schenker requests another copy of Beethoven Op. 109, and lists the sources he
has now consulted, the communications with scholars, the cost and time involved, proclaims
the "spectacular" findings made, and the incompetence of all previous editors
unmasked.
-
OC 52/495 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 28, 1912
Hertzka is sending another copy of Beethoven Op. 109, and is pleased to hear
of Schenker's discoveries. -- He asks for a discussion regarding the proposed "Alliance"
[recte "Organization"], on which he has some new ideas. -- He may look again at Hans
Weisse's music in 1913.
-
OJ 15/15, [H] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated [September] 23, [1913]
Weisse expresses his delight at the approach just made to his teacher from
publishing house of C. F. Peters. He affirms his indebtedness to his teacher for all that he has
learned and, regarding himself more a son than a mere pupil of Schenker’s, he asks to be
addressed in future by the familiar "Du," though he would want to continue to use "Sie" when
addressing his teacher.
-
OJ 5/27, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Evelina Pairamall, dated November 12,
1913
Schenker thanks Evelina Pairamall warmly for sending him an article by
Saint-Saens on manuscripts in Berlin, which covers an autograph manuscript of Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony, and reports to her his own work on another autograph of that work. -- He asks if she
is returning to Vienna soon, and promises to show her his discoveries, concluding with a joke
employing musical technical terms.
-
OJ 15/16, [23] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 16, 1914
Weisse thanks Schenker for clippings of two articles from the Münchener Zeitung.
Returning them, he critiques Alexander Berrsche's references there to the theory of the trill as
expounded in Schenker's Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OJ 12/9, [10] Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated November 21, 1914
Karpath describes his editorial policy for the periodical Der Merker and asks
Schenker for contributions.
-
WSLB-Hds 95654 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated July 24, 1916
Schenker tells Seligmann that he has arranged for copies of his critical
editions of Beethoven’s Op. 110 and Op. 111 to be sent to him. He speaks of the positive
interest his works have received in Germany, and about Hugo Riemann asking him to provide
autobiographical material for an entry in the next edition of his music
lexicon.
-
WSLB-Hds 95655 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated August 5, 1916
Schenker explains why he is reluctant to produce a critical edition with
commentary for Beethoven’s Op. 106: he would wear himself out working on it unless he could
be freed from some of his teaching obligations, and also the autograph manuscript and other
sources are missing. He also defends his sharp tongue in discussions of the secondary
literature in his “paradigmatic” works ("Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony" and the critical
editions of the late Beethoven piano sonatas).
-
WSLB 292 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 30, 1918
Schenker complains that Halm's request to receive review copies of others of his
works has been ignored by UE, threatens to pay for them himself, and asks to be notified when
they are dispatched.
-
OJ 8/3, [56] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 31, 1918
Schenker inquires as to the price of a jar of jam that Valerie Violin brought him
and lays down a "no presents" rule; reports Halm's difficulties in obtaining copies of
Schenker's works from UE.
-
OJ 14/45, [10] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 5,
1918
Schenker, Violin alleges, has accused him of a dearth of subject matter in letter
writing; Violin defends himself on grounds that his life has been disrupted by military service
and the impact of that on his physical and mental state. He accuses Schenker of insensitivity,
and treating him like his pupils. He defends his wife for giving food to the Schenkers, and
explains her motivation for so doing.
-
OJ 6/6, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 17, 1918
Schenker warns Violin to expect a letter from Vrieslander concerning a
contribution to a Festschrift for Schenker's 50th birthday, and then airs a number of grievances
against Moriz and Valerie concerning jars of jam, Sunday visits, and insufficient food.
-
WSLB 294 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 23, 1918
Requests a copy of Op. 111 to be sent to Rudolf Steglich.
-
WSLB 295 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 3, 1918
Schenker notifies Hertzka of an unfavorable review of the Beethoven edition in
Lausanne, and asks to see it.
-
WSLB 296 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 8, 1918
Schenker thanks Hertzka for dispatching Op. 111 to Steglich, but baulks at paying
the specified amount and sends less. -- Must finish Kontrapunkt 2 and will then return to the
Kleine Bibliothek.
-
WSLB 297 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 9, 1918
Schenker encloses a review by Bekker and comments adversely.
-
OJ 8/3, [58] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 13, 1918
Schenker reports on Kufferath's article in the Gazette de Lausanne discussing the
polemical materials in Die letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 111, and on the treasonous stance of the
Arbeiterzeitung.
-
WSLB 298 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated April 17, 1918
Schenker returns the article by Maurice Kufferath and comments on it critically.
-- Beethoven did give phrase-markings, thus Schenker advocates inserting fingering but not
additional phrase-marks. -- Diatribe against Hans von Bülow's editions and those who have
emulated him.
-
WSLB 299 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 17, 1918
Schenker thanks Hertzka for forwarding to him a postcard from Wilibald Gurlitt,
and asks advice on how to address his reply.
-
WSLB 300 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 25, 1918
Schenker encloses his letter to Gurlitt and asks Hertzka to arrange for it to be
sent.
-
WSLB 301 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22, 1918
Schenker asks for a copy of his Neunte Sinfonie to be sent to Bernhard Seidmann.
-
WSLB 302 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), May 18, 1919
Schenker reminds Hertzka of Hans Weisse's doctoral dissertation, Der Kunstwalzer,
and recommends it for publication. He laments, in provocatively vulgar language, that the
Viennese have become subservient to the French.
-
OC 52/207 Typed postcard from Ernst Roth (UE) to Schenker, dated May 20, 1919
Hertzka is away and expected back in 8-10 days.
-
OC 1 B/35-40 Handwritten draft letter, in Jeanette Kornfeld/Schenker's hand, from Schenker to
Hertzka (UE), undated [June 10, 1919]
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art and all manifestations of human life are inextricably
interconnected. He claims that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long
run. His sole concern is with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
WSLB 303 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 12, 1919
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art, life, and politics are inextricably interconnected. He claims
that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long run. His sole concern is
with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
OC 52/208 Postal receipt for letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 13, 1919
Postal receipt for letter WSLB 303 from Schenker to Hertzka
-
WSLB 306 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 2, 1919
Schenker requests a copy of his Ninth Symphony monograph, stipulating conditions;
he will decide shortly whether to resume work for UE.
-
WSLB 307 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 13, 1919
Schenker teases Hertzka over his offical's price calculation for Beethovens
Neunte Sinfonie; asks for Die letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 111 for Dolfi Baudrexel; comments
caustically on the first issue of Musikblätter des Anbruch.
-
WSLB 308 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 22, 1919
Schenker sends adjusted payment for two items received; his Kleine Bibliothek
will shake up the contributors to Musikblätter des Anbruch.
-
WSLB 309 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 22, 1919
Schenker outlines a production schedule of his work for UE, which includes Die
letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 101, the Kleine Bibliothek, and the complete edition of Beethoven
piano sonatas. He makes stipulations about production, and asks questions about honoraria.
-
WSLB 304 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 7, 1919
Schenker suggests date, place, and time for a meeting.
-
OJ 8/3, [73] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, December 15,
1919
Schenker reports on his meeting with Emil Hertzka and the latter's offers on Die
letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 101 and the Kleine Bibliothek, about which Schenker wishes to talk
with Violin.
-
WSLB 310 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 17, 1919
Louis Koch has given consent; Schenker asks Hertzka to pick up the photographs
while in Frankfurt; they need to discuss how Schenker allocates his time for the Kleine
Bibliothek and other tasks.
-
WSLB 305 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 21, 1919
Schenker informs Hertzka that he has ordered two more Beethoven sketchbooks in
connection with Op. 101, and asks him for some other "apportionment," which will protect him
from long-term deterioration of the exchange rate.
-
OJ 10/3, [5] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8,
1920
Deutsch reports that Hertzka wants the music connoisseur edition of the
"Moonlight" Sonata to include facsimiles only, not textually cleaned editions. Deutsch
outlines the basis of the contract (editors will receive 8% of the retail price) and the
production timetable. He asks if Schenker would rather take on a different facsimile due to
competition from a Copenhagen publisher. Schenker's Theory of Harmony was not it stock in
Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [7] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 16,
1920
Deutsch will write to the Beethoven House in Bonn to seek permission to
reproduce the manuscript of the "Moonlight" Sonata. He suggests using the first edition as
the source for the missing opening and closing bars, and asks Schenker to refrain from
polemics in his commentary. Copies of the manuscripts of Beethoven's piano sonatas Opp. 28,
109, 110 and 111 should not be difficult to obtain, and he has made inquiries regarding the
manuscripts of Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op. 106 and Mozart's A minor Rondo K.
511.
-
OJ 10/3, [8] Handwritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 12,
1920
The Beethoven House will only allow reproduction of the manuscript of the
"Moonlight" Sonata in return for a royalty. Deutsch has offered 5% of the retail
price.
-
OJ 8/3, [84] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 16, 1920
Moriz Schenker extends invitation to meet, confirms sum of 68,080 Kronen. —
Meeting with Hertzka scheduled for next day.
-
OJ 8/3, [85] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 12, 1920
Schenker inquires about Furtwängler, and reports progress with Hertzka.
-
OC 52/411 Typed letter from Detoni and Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated September 14, 1920
Kalmus is glad Schenker approves of the type samples and gives estimates for the
extent per page, has not yet heard from Wellesz re the "Appassionata" Sonata, is contacting
Hertzka about the "Waldstein" Sonata photography, will send documentary evidence regarding a
1912 payment, and sends copies of Beethoven sonatas.
-
OC 52/450 Typed letter from Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated October 25, 1920
Kalmus confirms receipt of EA Op. 101 manuscript; he inquires about the
publication sequence between EA Op. 101 and the first issue of the Kleine Bibliothek, and about
the autograph manuscript for which Schenker is waiting.
-
OC 52/242 Typed postcard from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 3, 1921
Hertzka confirms day and time of meeting.
-
OC 52/244 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 12, 1921
Hertzka sends contracts for NMTP and Kontrapunkt 2, and discusses the take-over
from Cotta, requesting Schenker's estimate of remaining stocks, and asking whether changes would
be required in a second edition of Kontrapunkt I.
-
OJ 8/4, [5] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 29, 1921
Schenker describes some of the last-minute activities prior to their moving to a
new apartment, at No. 8 Keilgasse, lists his works that are about to be published, and reports
that Buxbaum has been dismissed as cellist of the Arnold Rosé Quartet.
-
OJ 6/7, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 13, 1921
Schenker gives an account of the move into Keilgasse 8 and describes his study in
the apartment. He outlines his holiday plans, and explains how he is raising the fees for
lessons in the autumn.
-
OC 52/486 Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Julie Kalbeck, Heinrich
Schenker, Eusebius Mandyczewski, and Hugo Schwarz, dated January 3, 1922
Otto Erich Deutsch writes concerning the contract for the series
Musikalische Seltenheiten, of which he is the general editor, and Universal Edition
the publisher. In view of the introduction by UE of "50 to 100" additional copies to
the print-run of 500 in a new luxury edition (handmade paper and half-leather
binding) of each volume, Deutsch seeks to obtain from UE improved royalty returns
for all the volume editors. He makes three recommendations, which he asks the four
current volume editors to affirm.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OC 1B/10-11 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 22‒23, 1922
Schenker returns materials for the Fifth Symphony article, reports a delay in
providing information for the facsimile edition of the "Spring" Sonata, and complains that he
has futilely lavished time on the purification of the German language for the second edition of
Die letzten fünf Sonaten ... Op. 109. — He agrees in principle to Hertzka's idea of an
"Urlinie-Ausgabe" of the Beethoven sonatas, and agrees to announce it in Tonwille 2, but asks
how the first seventeen sonatas are to be done retrospectively, and rejects the suggestion that
his pupils might make the preparatory graphs.
-
OJ 10/3, [29] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 20, 1922
Deutsch writes that the "Moonlight" Sonata facsimile edition is still being
printed, and that he cannot make a decision on the production of a second facsimile edition
until the new contract has been agreed with Universal Edition. The contract has been delayed
by Universal Edition's dispute with Drei Masken. If they have to abandon plans for the
facsimile edition of Beethoven's "Spring" Sonata Op. 24 because of the dispute, Deutsch
suggests Beethoven's String Quartet Op. 95 as an alternative.
-
OJ 6/7, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 6, 1922
This wide-ranging letter describes the difficulties encountered with Emil Hertzka
at Universal Edition, concerning an attack on the music critic Paul Bekker planned for the
"Miscellanea" of Tonwille 2. — He expresses his displeasure with Weisse for putting his success
as a composer in the way of aiding his teacher's cause, and for exploiting his teacher's
generosity. — Ends with generous praise for Violin's musicianship.
-
JOB 94-3, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated May 25, 1922
Schenker sends a sketch of Mendelssohn's "Altdeutsches Lied"; — justifies an
instance of his fingering questioned by Hammer; — complains about Hertzka; — promises to
read Fiedler and Hildebrand.
-
OJ 8/4, [12] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [June 17, 1922]
Schenker explains why the "Miscellanea" is missing from Tonwille 2; he likens
Hertzka's heavy-handedness to Prince Metternich's police-state tactics.
-
OJ 14/45, [15] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 3, 1922
Violin reports that his son Karl has suffered several setbacks of health,
including inflammation of a cardiac muscle. Plans for Musikhochschule in Hamburg are making
strides.
-
OJ 14/45, [17] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Apparently having returned from a visit to Vienna, Violin expresses his joy at
having seen Schenker recently.
-
OC B/145 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated September 25,
1922
Altmann has dispatched two items to Schenker, and asks Schenker to instruct UE
to send copies of Der Tonwille to the Preussische Staatsbibliothek.
-
OJ 8/4, [16] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 29, 1922
Schenker reports, among other things, that Hans Weisse has returned as a paying
pupil.
-
OC B/143 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated October 9,
1922
Altmann acknowledges receipt of Der Tonwille and return of two editions, and
refers to Universal Edition.
-
DLA 69.930/11 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated November 2, 1922
Schenker acknowledges receipt of two booklets on youth and the new republic,
returns them, comments on them critically: idealistic German democrats desire maximal
remuneration with minimal work; illustrates point by difficulties with maids in Schenker
household; German democrats naively overestimate social and intellectual status of non-German
commoners (French, British, American); Schenker decries cosmopolitanism and those Germans who
advocate individuality at the expense of society; Schenker praises the fascists as countering
communism and social leveling, compares Mussolini's Italy favorably with present-day
Germany.
-
OJ 6/7, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 21, 1922
Schenker reports the imminent publication of Tonwille 3, and some new publishing
ventures, including a (new) edition of music by C. P. E. Bach and an "Urlinie Edition" of the
Short Preludes by J. S. Bach.
-
OJ 10/1, [73] Typewritten letter from Walter and Margarete Dahms to Schenker, dated December 27,
1922
Dahms has been trying to improve his publishers' financial terms. — He is in
low-grade accommodation; housing in the "German colonies" is available only to officials. —
Reports on the concert season in Rome. — Die Musik would not accept an article from him on
Schenker's teachings. — Comments on a recent article by Paul Bekker, on Emil Hertzka's
"sabotaging" of Schenker, and Furtwängler's lack of whole-hearted support. — Is still working on
his latest book, for which he is arranging a de luxe edition by subscription. — Reports
unfavorably on an incident in which Otto Klemperer played the Italian fascist
hymn.
-
JOB 94-3, [4] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hammer dated January 21, 1923
Schenker alerts Hammer to the publication of Tonwille 3.
-
OJ 8/4, [20] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 21,
1923
Schenker reports on the publication progress of Der Tonwille, and on his plans to
get his pupils to help him distribute copies to schools and potentially interested readers.
-
OJ 14/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 6, 1923
Violin thanks Schenker for Tonwille 3 and reports on growing social unrest and
anti-French feeling in Germany.
-
OJ 10/1, [74] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated February 9, 1923
Dahms reports change of address and explains circumstances; has sent a
prospectus to UE; progress on subscriptions to his de luxe edition and a new American
contact; synopsis of his planned Bel Canto book. — He praises the "Miscellanea" in Tonwille
3, and comments on Schenker's understanding of democracy.
-
OJ 10/1, [75] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated May 7, 1923
Dahms has received Vrieslander's essay on Schenker; reports progress on
subscriptions for his de luxe edition, proofs, and his work on Haydn; political comment.
-
OJ 10/1, [76] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated May 19, 1923
Hertzka's excuse for not subscribing; gives summer address; asks ornamentation
question about the "Les adieux" sonata.
-
OJ 10/1, [77] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 15, 1923
Dahms sends best wishes on Schenker's [55th] birthday, thanks him for his
assistance, and praises vol. I of Schenker's Beethoven sonata edition. Members of the German
community in Rome reject his assertions about genius.
-
OJ 6/7, [5] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9,
1923
Having settled into country life in the Tyrol, Schenker returns to his work, in
particular to the ongoing battles with Hertzka over the publication of Der Tonwille. He asks
Violin’s opinion about a subscription plan for a periodical that would appear four times a year
(instead of the current two), and hopes that his friend might spare a few days to visit him in
Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 14, 1923
Violin has met an industrialist by the name of Max Temming who would be willing
to help make Schenker’s work more widely accessible. Violin will probably not visit the
Schenkers in Galtür this summer, as prices have gone up in Germany.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OJ 12/11, [1] Handwritten letter from Klenau to Schenker, dated September 17, 1923
First approach from Klenau: asks to visit Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [7] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 21,
1923
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker expresses his joy at Karl Violin’s improving
health, and goes on to mention a number of personal successes he has lately had, including a
visit from Paul von Klenau to take advice for a forthcoming performance of Beethoven’s Missa
solemnis. He has also had some unexpected support from his publisher, who wants to expand Der
Tonwille to a quarterly publication. He is planning to take part in a series of charity concerts
(three Haydn piano trios), and has heard that Clemens Kraus and Hans Knappertsbusch are
overtaking Furtwängler as conductors in Vienna by accepting more modest fees.
-
JOB 94-3, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated October 24, 1923
Schenker invites Hammer and his wife for November 7; — The problem of the
"middleman" (performer, etc.) in music, by contrast with painting; — he reports on Hertzka's
proposal to make Tonwille a quarterly publication.
-
OJ 10/1, [79] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 1, 1923
Dahms has devoted a chapter of his Musik des Südens to "genius" in which he
asserts its absoluteness and the gulf between genius and mediocrity. — He concurs with
Hertzka's judgement of Furtwängler as a "coward"; In his quest for success, the latter has
compromised his belief in genius by pandering to Schoenberg. The Korngolds are coming to
Rome in August.
-
OJ 6/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14, 1924
Schenker reports continuing trouble with Hertzka, especially over delays to the
publication of Tonwille 5 and 6, which were supposed to appear the previous year, and is
beginning to think about legal action. Hertzka has made his position so difficult that he feels
obliged to turn down Max Temming's offer of direct financial support for his work. He asks
Violin to help find a post in Hamburg for Carl Bamberger, a gifted pupil who, though he
neglected his piano studies for a while, is keen to make up for lost time. Finally, he asks if
Violin received any of the four volumes of the Beethoven piano sonata edition.
-
OJ 8/4, [28] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [March 30, 1924]
Schenker confirms Violin's interpretation [given in his previous letter] of the
"Appassionata" Sonata, and describes continued difficulties with Hertzka. Herman Roth has
written to say that he and his son are using Schenker's analyses of Bach preludes in their
counterpoint classes, and expresses the hope that one day they will continue Schenker's work
independently.
-
DLA 69.930/12 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated April 3‒4, 1924
In response to matters raised by Halm in two previous letters, Schenker discusses
figuration, distinguishing between that which works only on the surface and that which arises
out of the middle and background, drawing on primal intervals. He also concedes that he heard
Bruckner improvising, and criticizes it adversely. He refers to Reger, and outlines plans for
forthcoming volumes of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 15/16, [52] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 28, 1924
Weisse is so absorbed in his work that he is unable to give Schenker a precise
number of subscribers to Der Tonwille among his circle of pupils. He will see Gerald Warburg
soon, but confesses that the latter felt hurt by Schenker’s article “The Mission of German
Genius.” — Weisse will devote much time to composition during the coming season, and for this
reason will forego taking further lessons from Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 16, 1924
After thanking Violin for his touching fiftieth-birthday tribute of 1918,
Schenker outlines plans for sending out copies of Der Tonwille: he has drawn up a list, which
Violin is free to edit. Like Violin, he has lost pupils recently, and so wants to concentrate
more on the dissemination of Der Tonwille, with a new publisher.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 6/7, [11] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 6, 1924
Schenker has received a photographic reproduction of the opening chorus of Bach's
St Matthew Passion. — Gives account of delays to the publication of Tonwille 8/9 and 10, blaming
Hertzka for being slow to send work to the engraver, and has written to him with a request to
dissolve the Tonwille contract with UE. — Refers to a recent review by (Julius) Korngold, and
recounts a long story about his piano dealer, Bernhard Kohn.
-
OJ 6/7, [13] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 13, 1924
Schenker sends Violin Jeanette's handwritten copy of the essay Violin had
composed for Schenker's fiftieth birthday in 1918, and hopes that it may one day be published. —
Has received a conciliatory letter from Hertzka, but is determined to move Der Tonwille to a
Munich publisher.
-
OC 54/2 Typed letter from Alfred Einstein & August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated
November 27, 1924
Having had soundings from Otto Vrieslander about taking over the publishing of
Der Tonwille, Drei Masken Verlag now approach Schenker directly, asking him to come to an
agreement with Universal Edition about the the future of the publication.
-
OC 54/5-7 Draft letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated as sent on December 9,
1924
In the light of an exchange of letters with UE, Schenker suggests that the new
publication have a new title (Die Urlinie) but that the old typeface and format be retained.
He suggests that the new periodical should include articles on each of the Chopin etudes and
the four Brahms symphonies, and on symphonies by Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert and Haydn, from
all of which book-length studies could subsequently be made.
-
OC 54/8 Postal receipt for a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated December 9,
1924
Postal receipt for OC 54/5-7.
-
OC 54/11 Typewritten postcard from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 19,
1925
Vrieslander thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10, remarks about negotiations with
Universal Edition and Drei Masken Verlag, and promises to send him an offprint of his recent
essay on C. P. E. Bach.
-
OC 54/12 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated January
20, 1925
Drei Masken Verlag offer to publish Schenker's future work as a yearbook,
entitled "Das Meisterwerk in der Musik," in volumes comprising fifteen gatherings (180 pages).
The manuscript would need to be delivered in July in order for the book to be published in time
for Christmas.
-
OC 54/15 Typewritten letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 24,
1925
Vrieslander reports a recent meeting at Drei Masken Verlag with Alfred
Einstein, whose character he rates highly and who assured him that he was looking forward to
publishing Schenker's work.
-
OJ 6/7, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 24, 1925
Responding point by point to Violin's previously letter (OJ 14/45, [41]),
Schenker congratulates his friend on the success of his recent concert. He writes at length
about Hertzka's last efforts to hold onto Der Tonwille, and about successful negotiations with
Drei Masken Verlag over its successor, Das Meisterwerk in der Musik. He has now to prepare
enough material for a yearbook comprising fifteen gatherings by July 1, so that the volume can
be published by Christmas. Finally, he echoes Violin's assessment of Hans Weisse, adding a few
disparaging remarks about his character.
-
OC 54/16-18 Draft letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated January 28, 1925
Schenker agrees to the idea of a yearbook, entitled "Das Meisterwerk in der
Musik," as put forward by Drei Masken Verlag, and now asks for a draft contract to be sent,
and for them to typeset some of his work so that he has an idea how long the manuscript for
the yearbook should be. He also vents his hostility towards Emil Hertzka at Universal
Edition.
-
OJ 14/45, [42] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 30, 1925
Violin lends Schenker the letters sent by university music departments
acknowledging receipt of their copies of Der Tonwille. The reviews of his recent concert were
cooler than the audience’s reception, and the concert suffered a financial loss; nonetheless he
hopes to persevere with public performances as a pianist. Finally, he wishes Schenker luck with
his new publisher, Drei Masken Verlag.
-
OJ 6/7, [17] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 2, 1925
Schenker, repeating some of the points made in earlier letters, continues to give an account of
Hertzka's dishonest dealings with him over Der Tonwille and asks Violin to give him an accurate count of the
subscriptions that Max Temming paid for in the distribution of free copies of the journal to university music
departments. He asks if Violin suspects that anti-Semitism lurks behind some of the critical notices of his recent
concert. Finally, he mentions an article in Die Musik by Paul Bekker that numbers Schenker among the hermeneutists;
the same issue contains a review of Der Tonwille, by Max Broesicke-Schon, disputing the supreme genius of the
canonic composers.
-
OC 54/20-22 Draft of a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated February 7,
1925
Schenker agrees to the terms of a contract outlined by Drei Masken Verlag. He
requests that Fraktur typeface be used in the printing of his Yearbook, and he also needs to
know the likely dimensions of the book (in words per page) so that he can plan its contents
accordingly. He ends with a diatribe against Emil Hertzka at Universal
Edition.
-
OJ 8/4, [35] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14,
1925
Schenker asks Violin urgently to send him the receipt for payment made to
Universal Edition (for the copies of Der Tonwille paid for by Max Temming).
-
OC 52/636 Handwritten letter from Robert Brünauer to Schenker, dated February 19,
1925
Robert Brünauer reports on the subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has taken
out.
-
OJ 6/7, [18] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his recent letter (and enclosure), which contains
evidence of Hertzka's false calculations of subscriptions to Der Tonwille – this letter in stark
contrast to the actions of his pupils Weisse and Brünauer, who had given more support to the
publication of Weisse's recently published vocal quartets than to his writings. Leaving Der
Tonwille behind, which has earned him little money and caused him much misery, he has written a
lengthy study of Bach's solo violin works, which will be published in the first volume of Das
Meisterwerk in der Musik, which will include a critique of Ernst Kurth's Grundlagen des linearen
Kontrapunkts.
-
OJ 10/1, [87] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated February 26, 1925
Dahms reports on the Vrieslanders' Italian travels; compares Hertzka
unfavorably to Drei Masken Verlag; He plans to sue Hertzka; comments on Bekker and Korngold.
-
OJ 11/36, [17] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated March 1, 1925
Hammer describes his travels and work in the past eight months, and compares the
piano playing of Otto Vrieslander with that of Schenker.
-
OC 54/28 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated March 3,
1925
Drei Masken Verlag is willing to use Der Tonwille as the title of Schenker's
Yearbook, but only with the approval of Hertzka at Universal Edition.
-
JOB 94-3, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated March 12, 1925
Wherever Hammer may travel, Schenker declares, he will never lose his
Germanness. Schenker asserts the superiority post-WWI of the German nation over those of the
west. -- He describes his own pianism: his "fingers are like musical brains." -- He gives an
account of the dispute with Universal Edition and the outcome of negotiations with Drei
Masken Verlag.
-
OJ 6/7, [19] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 10, 1925
Continuing the story of the ongoing financial battle against Hertzka and
Universal Edition, Schenker thanks Violin for providing confirmation of the subscriptions paid
for by Max Temming, then recounts that, at a meeting with Hertzka and his bookkeeper, the
order-book for Der Tonwille had several pages torn out. Schenker is upset that his lawyer Dr.
Baumgarten, though an old friend, is not fully supportive of his position and would prefer seek
a compromise with Hertzka; this, Schenker feels, would rob him of much of his hard-earned
royalties, especially from the Beethoven sonata edition. He now asks Violin to find a contact –
outside Hamburg – who would be willing to order nine copies of Tonwille 1, as evidence that this
issue is still in demand, despite Hertzka's claims to the contrary. He has attended a
performance of Hans Weisse's Sextet, of which he found the variation movement and the trio
section of the scherzo to be the most satisfactory parts.
-
OJ 6/7, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 4, 1925
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker sends Violin money for arranging the order of
Der Tonwille (which must consist of multiple copies of Tonwille 1); Hertzka's representative,
Robert Scheu, is currently studying the papers relating to Schenker's threat of legal action.
Schenker continues to express his astonishment at Furtwängler's ignorance of sonata form, a fact
that does not prevent him from earning huge fees for conducting in New York. He has turned down
a request from a lady who teaches in New York and a former pupil (now in St. Gallen), who wish
to spend some time with him in Galtür. He enquires about the personal difficulties that Violin
writes about in his letter, and asks him to say more; they will invite his sister for a visit.
He will send him a copy of the medallion (designed by Alfred Rothberger); the portrait by Viktor
Hammer is not yet finished.
-
OJ 6/7, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 16, 1925
Making preparations with his solicitor for the legal action against Universal
Edition, Schenker asks Violin to find out whether Max Temming paid for the additional
subscriptions to Der Tonwille directly through Albert Gutmann in Vienna, or through the firm of
Hofmeister in Leipzig. He is nearing completion of the contents of the first Meisterwerk
yearbook and asks Violin whether he has yet made summer plans and whether these might include a
trip to Galtür.
-
OJ 6/7, [22] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 30, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his latest efforts to account for subscriptions to Der
Tonwille. He sends him the smaller version of the bronze medallion designed by Alfred
Rothberger.
-
OJ 14/45, [43] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 4, 1925
Violin thanks Schenker for sending him the small version of the medallion
designed by Alfred Rothberger. He does not want to give an account of the difficult times he
is facing, expecting that things will eventually turn out for the better. He returns some
money, left over from the purchase of copies of Tonwille 10, which Schenker had previously
sent him.
-
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
-
OJ 15/16, [55] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, incomplete, written c. August 5,
1925
Weisse apologizes for not having written for a long time. He has seen Furtwängler
and reports that the conductor knows nothing of his writings and has no idea about the Urlinie.
Universal Edition have declined to publish his Sextet. (In the missing portion of the letter,
which is summarized in Schenker's diary, he asks his teacher's help in finding another
publisher, perhaps with Wilhelm Altmann's intervention.)
-
OJ 6/7, [24] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 15, 1925
After expressing his sympathy for Violin, in response to his friend's depressing
postcard, Schenker gives an account of some of the summer events, including a visit from
Vrieslander and Hoboken and work on two essays for Meisterwerk 2. While continuing to rail
against Hertzka and Universal Edition, he repeats the story of Drei Masken Verlag failing to
send him 250 Marks upon receipt of the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. His brother Moses is,
however, acquainted with the principal owner of Drei Masken, Felix Sobotka, and through this
connection the payment has been made.
-
OJ 6/7, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 25, 1925
In this wide-ranging letter, Schenker commiserates with Violin about the high
cost of living, and his inability to raise his fees to keep up with it (in particular, he
feels unable to ask the wealthy Hoboken to pay more than his other pupils). He reports on
sales of a medallion bearing his image, and the imminent arrival of a mezzotint of his
portrait, made by Viktor Hammer, of which his brother Moses Schenker has bought the original
drawing. Vrieslander will write an essay about his work in Die Musik, accompanied by the
portrait, and things are now going well with the corrections to Meisterwerk 1 and the
writing of Meisterwerk 2.
-
OJ 10/1, [91] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated December 1, 1925
The [Hammer] mezzotint has arrived; Dahms expresses a reservation about
it. — He has been writing for Die Musik. — He succeeded in getting compensation from UE.
-
OC 54/96-99 Draft of a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag in Jeanette Schenker’s hand
with corrections in Heinrich Schenker’s hand, dated July 14, 1926
Schenker agrees to a delay to the start of production of the second
Meisterwerk volume, but insists that it continue to be understood as a “Yearbook,” i.e. as
part of a series of publications and not as an individual book, and that it bear the year
1926.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.559 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Deutsch, dated June 6, 1927
Schenker asks Deutsch to make inquiries at the British Museum on his behalf,
concerning the autograph manuscript of Beethoven’s Sonata Op. 79. He is annoyed with Hertzka
for letting someone else take on the editing of Mozart’s piano sonatas for Universal
Edition.
-
OJ 89/2, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated June 22, 1928
With thanks for birthday greetings, Schenker expresses how highly he values the
Photogrammarchiv while endorsing van Hoboken's turning down of an "honor" that he was offered. —
Schenker has, at Einstein's request, updated his entry in Riemann's Musiklexikon. — With the
success of the Urlinie through Der Tonwille, he no longer considers himself isolated.
-
OC 52/846 Typed letter from Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated December 1, 1928
Hertzka is away until mid-December.
-
OC 52/847 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 21, 1928
Hertzka welcomes Schenker's intention now to produce [his elucidatory edition
of] Op. 106 and proposes the level of honorarium. — He is in principle interested in the
"Eroica" study and Der freie Satz but cannot schedule them until after
1929.
-
WSLB 403 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 23, 1928
Schenker reports on the autograph manuscript of Beethoven Op. 79. — He is
"convinced" that the autograph of Op. 106 is in England.
-
WSLB 405 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 9, 1929
Schenker sets deadline for decision on publishing "Eroica" monograph; stresses
urgency.
-
OC 52/849 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 15, 1929
Hertzka asks for Schenker's deadline for the "Eroica" monograph decision to be
put off to the end of 1929.
-
WSLB 408 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 19, 1929
Schenker inquires after Hertzka's decision on the "Eroica" monograph; gives
his vacation address.
-
OC 52/850 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 21, 1929
No decision on the "Eroica" monograph yet.
-
WSLB 410 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 28, 1929
Schenker will be patient until 1930.
-
OJ 15/16, [62] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 5, 1929
Weisse, absorbed by Schenker's ideas (especially the concept of "tonal space")
tells of his plans to write about his teacher's significance as a contemporary theorist. He
describes his progress in composition, which includes the completion of a set of six bagatelles
for piano and a Clarinet Quintet, and much work on an Octet. He asks about progress on Der freie
Satz and about the publication of Schenker's analysis of the "Eroica" Symphony, and reports his
and Hertha's joy in parenthood.
-
OJ 5/7a, [27] (formerly vC 27) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 10, 1929
Schenker reponds, on information from Reinhard Oppel, to Cube's question in OJ
9/34, [19] about finding a publisher; advises Cube to seek friends who will play his music,
after which publication should ensue. Schenker gives detailed comments, with music examples, on
Cube's two piano sonatas, praising them highly and making suggestions for
improvement.
-
OJ 6/7, [44] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated November 24, 1929
After reply to some of the more personal points in Violin's previous letter,
Schenker welcomes his friend's efforts to look for a publisher for the Eroica Symphony
monograph, noting that, in spite of the difficulties that Hertzka has caused him, his books
are still in print and his status as a theorist has been acknowledged by the the fact that
the universities of Heidelberg and Leipzig have expressed an interest in appointing him. A
recent article in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung will give Violin further ammunition when
approaching a publisher. That same issue also contains an article by Schoenberg touching on
various canonic works (Bach, Prelude in C sharp minor for the Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1;
Beethoven, Seventh Symphony, finale; Mozart, slow introduction to the "Dissonant" Quartet).
He feels that it is beneath his dignity to make a formal reply; but to illustrate what he
means, and why he is contemptuous of Schoenberg, he provides several voice-leading graphs
and other music examples concerning these works.
-
WSLB 418/1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [December 19,
1929]
Schenker recommends an essay by Gerhard Albersheim; raises possibility of
unchanged re-issue of Harmonielehre.
-
OC 52/857 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 20, 1929
Hertzka is interested in the Albersheim essay; prospects for a re-edition of
Harmonielehre not good.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
WSLB 419 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 28, 1929
Reminder of Hertzka's promise to decide about the "Eroica"
monograph.
-
OC 52/858 Typed postcard from Alfred Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated December 31,
1929
Hertzka will respond after returning mid-January.
-
OC 52/860 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 16, 1930
Hertzka sees no prospect of publishing the "Eroica" study as a
monograph.
-
OC 54/296 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated April 16, 1930
Furtwängler encloses a letter from Karl Straube, and cautions Schenker against
publishing with Breitkopf.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Wilhelm Furtwängler, dated April 19,
1930
Schenker is willing to hand over an unidentified "book" [Meisterwerk III] to
Breitkopf & Härtel on condition that publication not be delayed; he refers to dealings with
other publishers and plans for future publications.
-
OC 54/298 Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated May 30, 1930
Furtwängler is angry at Straube's reply, and may sound out Max Hesse — He has
resigned his Vienna position.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.565 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated July 20, 1930
In this 16-page response to a letter from Deutsch, Schenker thanks his
correspondent for his unstinting assistance (in relation to the third Meisterwerk
yearbook) and underlines the importance of a collected edition of the works of C. P.
E. Bach. — He then launches a long and detailed denunciation of Anthony van
Hoboken’s character, referring in particular to his treatment of Otto Vrieslander,
his ambivalence towards projects associated with the Photogram Archive, and his
absconding to Berlin to study the piano with Rudolf Breithaupt; Hoboken is
thoroughly undeserving of a high honor conferred by the Austrian
state.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 9/34, [28] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
Cube reports enrollment and quality of students at the Schenker Institute,
Hamburg; his own teaching is increasingly small-group-tuition based, drawing on Tonwille and
Meisterwerk. Karl Violin is recovering.
-
NYnscl MP.0008.01/1/1, 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Arthur Waldeck, dated November 8,
1932
Schenker stipulates the conditions for granting publication rights for a
translation of his Harmonielehre, and asks which other Schenkerians in the U.S. Waldeck is
acquainted with.
-
OC 18/42 Handwritten picture postcard from Karpath to Schenker, dated November 15,
1932
Karpath asks Schenker to phone him.
-
OJ 5/18, 17 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, incorrectly dated September 1932 [recte:
December 1, 1932]
Schenker discusses likely sales for Jonas's Das Wesen, and will himself help
promote the book; warns Jonas against Hoboken.
-
OJ 89/6, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated February 17, 1933
Congratulating Hoboken on his forthcoming marriage to Frl. Boy, Schenker
reports that Kalmus is playing a devious financial game over Oktaven u. Quinten (which is in
press) and Der freie Satz (which he thinks will take two years to publish) that may yet see
the latter revert to Cotta. — He speaks of Marx's naiveté over the proposed school version
of Harmonielehre. — He reports on the remaining stocks of Das Meisterwerk in der
Musik.
-
OJ 5/18, 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated March 22, 1933
Schenker recounts Joseph Marx's requirements for adapting his Harmonielehre
for teaching purposes, and the involvement of Alfred Kalmus at UE. — Refers to Vrieslander's
adaptation of Kontrapunkt and Jonas's of Harmonielehre. — Reports Hans Weisse's success;
alludes to the Handel-Schenker Saul project.
-
FS 40/1, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated March 25, 1934
Schenker cancels the seminar for March 30, and sends Easter greetings. — Is keen
to read the manuscript of Salzer's book. — Reports letter from Weisse regarding an English
translation of Harmonielehre.