-
OJ 5/15, [2]-[3] Handwritten incomplete draft of a letter from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [?c. June
1, 1908]
Responding to Grunsky's request, Schenker gives his assessment of Bruckner's
music. First exploring common ground between him and Grunsky, he then offers "technical
reasons" why he regards Bruckner as "possessing minimal powers of invention," therefore
cannot call him a "master." In the process, he compares the "Komponisten" (composers) of the
present day unfavorably with the "Tonsetzer" (tonal craftsmen) of the past.
-
OJ 5/35, [3] Handwritten draft or letter-copy from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated September 28,
1908
Schenker comments on Wagner's alterations to Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and
outlines his own plans, wishing to see Wagner reduced to the same subordinate place as Gluck
[unaware of the provocation this will be to Rudorff!]. — He takes issue with Beyschlag's
interpretation of the turn in Haydn's music.
-
OJ 7/4, [60] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 14, 1910
Schenker will see Violin tomorrow. He has been "pumped" by Robert
Hirschfeld.
-
CA 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 19, 1910
A fire at his hotel causes Schenker to ask whether Cotta has sent him final
proofs recently. — He inquires whether he might travel to Stuttgart to present his plan for
the Handbibliothek in person.
-
OJ 14/44, [1] Handwritten letter from the Vereinigung Wiener Musikreferenten (Theodor Antropp and
Paul Stauber) to Schenker, dated September 30, 1910
The Association invites Schenker to give a lecture series on Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony.
-
OC 1A/4-5 Handwritten letter, carbon copy, from Schenker to Hans Liebstoeckl, dated May 30,
1911
Schenker asks Liebstöckl to place an announcement [of a lecture series] in the
Illustrirtes Wiener Extrablatt.
-
OC B/176 Handwritten letter from Albert Kopfermann (Königliche Bibliothek zu Berlin) to
Schenker, dated November 18, 1913
Kopfermann provides an estimate for the photography of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony
that Schenker has requested; and notifies him of another source of this work in the Library's
holdings.
-
OJ 9/30, [7] Handwritten letter from Carl Colbert to Schenker, dated September 6, 1920
Carl Colbert invites Schenker to submit an article to Der Abend for the 150th
anniversary of Beethoven's birth.
-
OJ 12/11, [5] Handwritten letter from Klenau to Schenker, dated October 21, 1923
Klenau thanks Schenker for advice on performing the "Eroica"
Symphony.
-
OJ 11/16, [5] Handwritten postcard from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November 25, 1923
Furtwängler had been hoping to speak with Schenker at the performance of
[Handel's] Samson but realizes this is not possible; mentions his December program, hopes to see
Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14, 1924
Schenker reports continuing trouble with Hertzka, especially over delays to the
publication of Tonwille 5 and 6, which were supposed to appear the previous year, and is
beginning to think about legal action. Hertzka has made his position so difficult that he feels
obliged to turn down Max Temming's offer of direct financial support for his work. He asks
Violin to help find a post in Hamburg for Carl Bamberger, a gifted pupil who, though he
neglected his piano studies for a while, is keen to make up for lost time. Finally, he asks if
Violin received any of the four volumes of the Beethoven piano sonata edition.
-
JOB 94-3, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated May 3, 1924
Schenker agrees to come on May 27 to sit for his portrait, and tells Hammer of
the forthcoming historical Beethoven Ninth Symphony concert.
-
OJ 12/11, [8] Handwritten letter from Klenau to Schenker, undated [May 20, 1924]
Klenau asks Schenker to read over an article that he has
written.
-
OJ 12/11, [10] Handwritten letter from Klenau to Schenker, dated September 23, 1924
Klenau sends a letter he has received from Felix Weingartner and his own
response.
-
OC 82/27-28 Handwritten letter from Georg Dohrn to Schenker, dated April 2, 1926
Dohrn inquires as to the performance of the opening of the second movement of
Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
-
OJ 5/9a, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Georg Dohrn, dated April 5, 1926
Schenker answers Dohrn's inquiry as to the performance of the opening of the
second movement of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
-
OC 54/122 Handwritten postcard from Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated January 19,
1927
Einstein thanks Schenker for the information provided (via Otto Erich Deutsch)
about the manuscripts of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, and uses the opportunity to express his
happiness that production of the second Meisterwerk Yearbook is now
underway.
-
OJ 6/7, [41] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 27, 1929
Schenker thanks Violin for his concerns, describes how they survived the cold
weather earlier in February, reports that his monograph on the "Eroica" Symphony is finished
and that he has written an article about the Photogram Archive, which has acquired over
seven thousand pages of manuscripts. He looks forward to seeing his friend in the
summer.
-
OJ 15/15, [39] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 13, 1929
Weisse arranges to meet Schenker outside the Musikverein before a performance
of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.
-
OJ 15/16, [66] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 8, 1931
Hearing that Schenker expects to complete Der freie Satz by early spring,
Weisse encourages his teacher to work systematically and unhurriedly at it. He reports on
Alfred Einstein’s defense of Schenker’s theories against Arnold Schering, and on a review of
a recent book on the Ninth Symphony in which the reviewer, Alfred Lorenz, sided with the
author against Schenker.
-
OJ 89/6, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated July 25, 1933
In writing of Hoboken's prospects as a composer, Schenker is not interested in
creating imitation Bachs and Brahmses. — He delights in Cortot's visit to the Photogram
Archive - but Cortot belongs to the already convinced. — He makes observations on some
inclosed feuilletons, and gives information about Goos.