-
OJ 13/25, [1] Handwritten letter from Albert Trentini (on behalf of Hermann Rinn) to Schenker,
dated February 23, 1927
Trentini invites Schenker to contribute to Der Kunstwart.
-
OJ 13/25, [2] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated April 6, 1927
Having received a letter from Schenker to Albert Trentini, Rinn welcomes the
prospect of Schenker contributing the occasional article to Der Kunstwart, and asks for a
title.
-
OJ 13/25, [3] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated December 7, 1928
Rinn enthusiastically thanks Schenker for his intention to write an article,
and for arranging to have the necessary photographic reproductions
prepared.
-
OJ 13/25, [4] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated February 7, 1929
Rinn reports that publication of "Eine Rettung der klassischen Musik-Texte"
must be delayed because a copy of the faulty Peters edition of Schubert's Sonata (Op. 78, in
G major), which is the subject of Schenker's essay, cannot be found anywhere in Munich. He
asks Schenker to send him his own copy, so that it can be used for the reproduction of the
musical text. He also mentions the death of August Halm, and his intention of marking the
event in the same issue in which Schenker's article is now to appear.
-
OJ 13/25, [5] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 7, 1929
Rinn apologizes for the small format in which the autograph of Schubert's
minuet was reproduced for Schenker's article "Eine Rettung der klassischen Musik-Texte." He
has publicized the work, and intends to send copies of it to university music departments
and inform other newspapers and journals of it. He expresses thanks for the efforts that
Schenker made in contributing to Der Kunstwart, and for his remarks on Bruckner's Ninth
Symphony.
-
OJ 13/25, [6] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 22, 1929
Rinn tells Schenker that Alfred Einstein has expressed an interest in
promoting Schenker's work on autograph manuscripts with a notice in the Berliner
Tageblatt.
-
OJ 13/25, [7] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated December 2, 1929
Rinn sends Schenker the October and November 1929 issues of Der Kunstwart. In
contrast to his own journal, he describes the progressive Münchener Neueste Nachrichten (for
whom Wilhelm Hausenstein, Joseph Roth, and Felix Salten were writing) as belonging to "the
other side."
-
OJ 13/25, [8] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated January 2, 1930
Rinn has sent Schenker copies of Der Kunstwart and will be in touch with him
about his next contribution, the extracts from the Masterwork yearbooks.
-
OJ 5/32, [1] Postal receipt from Schenker to Rinn, dated January 23, 1930
Schenker sends the Hammer portrait to Rinn.
-
OJ 13/25, [9] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 8, 1930
Vrieslander's article about Schenker for Der Kunstwart is too technical and
too long for a journal with amateur readership; he has asked Vrieslander to shorten it. — He
expresses enthusiasm for Schenker's idea of writing about the relationship of the great
German poets to music.
-
OJ 5/32, [2] Postal receipt from Schenker to Rinn, dated April 8, 1930
Schenker returns the galley-proofs of Vrieslander's article about
him.
-
OJ 13/25, [10] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated May 15, 1930
Rinn sends a copy of Vrieslander's article on Schenker, which will appear in
the next issue of Der Kunstwart. — He looks forward to receiving Schenker's essay on German
poets and music, and hopes that Schenker will consider writing some commentary-style pieces
for him.
-
OJ 5/9, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated May 15, 1930
Discusses Beethoven's song "Neue Liebe, neues Leben" (Op. 75, No. 2). Dr. Rinn
will be inviting Deutsch to collaborate.
-
OJ 13/25, [11] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated June 13, 1930
Rinn hopes Schenker will soon finish his great work (i.e. Free Composition)
soon and devote himself to writing for Der Kunstwart.
-
OJ 10/3, [131] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 5, 1930
Deutsch advises Schenker to send a sample of proofs of the third Meisterwerk
yearbook to the editor of Der Kunstwart. He thanks him for copies of the letters written by
Leo Kestenberg.
-
OJ 13/25, [12] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated November 17, 1930
Rinn recommends an discussion in the Münchener Zeitung involving one of his
assistants, Alexander Berrsche. He looks forward to seeing the third Masterwork yearbook and
speaks of publishing a selection of "aphorisms" from the second and third
yearbooks.
-
OJ 5/32, [3] Postal receipt from Schenker to Rinn, dated November 20, 1930
Schenker sends Rinn Meisterwerk II and the page-proofs of Meisterwerk
III.
-
OJ 13/25, [13] Typewritten postcard from Rinn to Schenker, dated December 5, [1930]
Rinn has extracted "aphorisms" from the three Meisterwerk volumes and sent the
page-proofs to Otto Vrieslander. — He would like to see the Tonwille pamphlets, with a view
to reprinting some of its articles.
-
WSLB 424 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated December 8, 1930
Schenker requests that a full set of Tonwille issues be sent to Hermann
Rinn.
-
OC 52/866 Typewritten postcard from Alfred Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated December 10,
1930
UE has sent a complimentary copy of Der Tonwille to Hermann
Rinn.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 6/8, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 28, 1931
Schenker is heartened that Herman Roth, once again, seems to be supporting his
cause. Schenker recommends a series of possible “guest speakers” at the Schenker Institute
and asks if there is some sort of monument or commemorative space devoted to C. P. E. Bach
in Hamburg.
-
OJ 14/10, [6] Typewritten letter from Arnold Weil to Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker, dated April
26, 1933
Arnold Weil thanks Heinrich Schenker for sending a copy of his Octaven u.
Quinten, offers a diplomatic comment, and points out a typographical error.
-
OJ 89/7, [14] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated August 4, 1934
Schenker asks about Hoboken's address. — An article has appeared belatedly in
the Deutsche Zeitschrift.