-
WSLB 119 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 5, 1912
Schenker inquires about the print-run and retail cost of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and points out an inconsistency in the edition number. He asks for
clarity on a payment he has just received, stressing his probity.
-
OJ 13/10, [7] Handwritten letter from Oppel to Schenker, dated September 7, 1919
Oppel expresses his pessimism in the aftermath of the war and the prospects for
his generation. He sends a chaconne for Schenker's comment, and reports his appointment as a
teacher in theory and composition at the Kiel Conservatory. Alfred Einstein asked him for a
review of the Erläuterungsausgabe, but he declined.
-
OJ 10/3, [29] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 20, 1922
Deutsch writes that the "Moonlight" Sonata facsimile edition is still being
printed, and that he cannot make a decision on the production of a second facsimile edition
until the new contract has been agreed with Universal Edition. The contract has been delayed
by Universal Edition's dispute with Drei Masken. If they have to abandon plans for the
facsimile edition of Beethoven's "Spring" Sonata Op. 24 because of the dispute, Deutsch
suggests Beethoven's String Quartet Op. 95 as an alternative.
-
OJ 10/3, [30] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 8, 1922
Deutsch has learnt from Dr. [Greta] Kraus that Dr. Haas still does not want to allow them to
reproduce facsimiles of Beethoven's "Spring" Sonata Op. 24, because he feels bound to Drei Masken. When
Universal Edition have confirmed this to Deutsch, Deutsch will ask Schenker to propose a different Beethoven
manuscript.
-
OC 54/2 Typed letter from Alfred Einstein & August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated
November 27, 1924
Having had soundings from Otto Vrieslander about taking over the publishing of
Der Tonwille, Drei Masken Verlag now approach Schenker directly, asking him to come to an
agreement with Universal Edition about the the future of the publication.
-
OC 54/4 Typed postcard from Alfred Einstein and August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated
December 9, 1924
Drei Masken Verlag acknowledge the receipt of Schenker’s letter of December 5,
1924.
-
OC 54/9 Typed postcard from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated
December 22, 1924
DMV acknowledge receipt of Schenker’s letter of December 9, 1924 and promise
to reply after the Christmas holidays.
-
OC 54/11 Typewritten postcard from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 19,
1925
Vrieslander thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10, remarks about negotiations with
Universal Edition and Drei Masken Verlag, and promises to send him an offprint of his recent
essay on C. P. E. Bach.
-
OC 54/12 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated January
20, 1925
Drei Masken Verlag offer to publish Schenker's future work as a yearbook,
entitled "Das Meisterwerk in der Musik," in volumes comprising fifteen gatherings (180 pages).
The manuscript would need to be delivered in July in order for the book to be published in time
for Christmas.
-
OJ 15/15, [17] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 22, 1925
Weisse alerts Schenker to the January 1925 issue of Die Musik, which contains two
pieces concerned with him. He suggests that Schenker travel to Munich, to negotiate a deal with
Alfred Einstein at Drei Masken-Verlag concerning the publication of a successor to Der
Tonwille.
-
OC 54/15 Typewritten letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 24,
1925
Vrieslander reports a recent meeting at Drei Masken Verlag with Alfred
Einstein, whose character he rates highly and who assured him that he was looking forward to
publishing Schenker's work.
-
OC 54/28 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated March 3,
1925
Drei Masken Verlag is willing to use Der Tonwille as the title of Schenker's
Yearbook, but only with the approval of Hertzka at Universal Edition.
-
OC 54/29 Typed postcard from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated June
10, 1925
Drei Masken Verlag requests that Schenker send the manuscript of the first
Meisterwerk Yearbook directly to their Munich office.
-
OJ 11/54, [6] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 3, 1926
Van Hoboken sends New Year greetings; reports that he is to see in the Paris
Conservatory Library the autograph manuscript of Beethoven's "Appassionata" Sonata, which
Einstein has apparently already photographed; he will travel to Vienna on January 6 for lesson
on January 9.
-
OC 54/58 Typewritten letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated
January 16, 1926
The facsimile edition of Mozart’s Don Giovanni will not be ready for some time; a
facsimile of Beethoven’s Op. 57 is planned, not by DMV but by a Paris
printing-house.
-
OC 54/63 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated
February 5, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag invite Schenker to write a short announcement about the
Meisterwerk Yearbook, to be sent to newspapers and music journals in advance of
publication.
-
OC 54/74 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated April 15, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag inform Schenker that the proof-copy of Meisterwerk 1 has been
sent to Dr. Einstein in Munich for final checking. They confirm that the majority of the music
examples will appear as an unbound supplement at the end of the book, agree to correct two
errors in the typesetting, and confirm the appearance of the cover.
-
OC 54/82 Typed postcard from Alfred Einstein and August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated June
14, 1926
The Munich office of Drei Masken Verlag acknowledges receipt of the
manuscript for Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, volume 2.
-
OC 54/104 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated
October 15, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag think that an advertisement for the first Meisterwerk
Yearbook in the December 1926 issue of Die Musik would be timely; they also report that
sales of the book have been slow.
-
OC 54/109 Typed letter from Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated December 11,
1926
Although he is confident that Drei Masken Verlag is not bound to publishing
Schenker’s second Meisterwerk Yearbook, Einstein suggests that the two of them come to a new
financial agreement so that production can take place.
-
OC 54/111 Typed letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8, 1927
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his recent communications, including a copy of the
contract with Drei Masken Verlag for the Meisterwerk Yearbook, and asks for a copy of
relevant extracts from the correspondence with the publishers. He reports progress in the
establishment of a Photogram Archive at the Austrian National Library, with the cooperation
of Dr Robert Haas and financial support from Anthony van Hoboken; similar plans to
photographically reproduce autograph manuscripts are underway at the Beethoven House in
Bonn, and (for manuscripts of Bach and Handel) also in England. He advises Schenker that
proofs will start arriving from the printing-house Waldheim in a few weeks, and expresses
his delight in being able to assist Schenker in the promotion of his work.
-
OC 54/113-115 Handwritten notes by Schenker for material sent to Otto Erich Deutsch in January
1927.
These notes form the basis of a letter from Schenker to Otto Erich Deutsch
that gives details of his difficulties with his present publisher (Drei Masken Verlag), and
provides a list of the extracts from the correspondence with DMV, which Jeanette Schenker
has copied out to assist Deutsch in renegotiating a contract to publish Schenker’s second
Meisterwerk Yearbook.
-
OJ 10/3, [52] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 15, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker if a (recent) edition of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony was
based on the facsimile edition. He has sent the manuscript (of Schenker’s second Meisterwerk
yearbook) to the publishers. A Haydn facsimile and a Handel print can be discussed
later.
-
BerkAE 7/898, [4] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Deutsch, dated January 16, 1927
Schenker responds to Deutsch’s request for information about the recent
facsimile edition of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, and the new edition of the symphony
published by the Philharmonischer Verlag. He had made changes to the text of the first
movement, but subsequently withdrew from the editing.
-
OC 54/122 Handwritten postcard from Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated January 19,
1927
Einstein thanks Schenker for the information provided (via Otto Erich Deutsch)
about the manuscripts of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, and uses the opportunity to express his
happiness that production of the second Meisterwerk Yearbook is now
underway.
-
OC 54/124 Typed letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 20, 1927
Vrieslander has received the Urlinie graphs for two essays in the second
Meisterwerk Yearbook, and explains to Schenker that he will exercise the utmost care in
preparing them for publication.
-
OC 54/129 Typed letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated February 10, 1927
Vrieslander assures Schenker that he has prepared the graphs for Mozart’s
Symphony in G minor with the utmost care, with due regard to his
instructions.
-
OC 54/131 Typed postcard from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, postmarked February 14,
1927
Vrieslander explains the way he has dealt with Schenker’s detailed comments on
the graph of Mozart’s Symphony in G minor.
-
OC 54/132 Typed letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated February 15, 1927
Vrieslander informs Schenker that Alfred Einstein (DMV) has decided to engrave
the music examples for the second Meisterwerk volume in order to ensure a flawless
reproduction. He also reports that the width of the pages in the supplement will be
expanded, and notifies Schenker of the changes that he will make to the music examples
following this decision. Vrieslander states he has officially enquired with Einstein about
potential problems in the printing process, making clear that Schenker will not be able to
bear any additional costs for printing errors.
-
OC 54/133 Copy of a letter from Otto Vrieslander to Alfred Einstein (DMV), dated February 15,
1927
Following Einstein’s determination to have the Urlinie graphs engraved, not
hand-drawn, Vrieslander asks that the engraver pays particular attention to the shape of the
large slurs, and suggests a meeting with the engraver to go over further problems. If the
graphs were relegated to an appendix, they could be as wide as necessary, for sake of
clarity.
-
OJ 10/3, [69] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 6,
1927
Deutsch regrets that Drei Masken Verlag has not yet sent Schenker his
complimentary copies [of the second Meisterwerk yearbook]; they will send an invoice for the
production costs. Hoboken ought to receive an honor from the Austrian state only after the
Photogrammarchiv is up and running. Deutsch has much to show Schenker from the first
editions of Beethoven sonatas. He wants to arrange a time to go through the corrections to
Schubert’s Symphony in B minor.
-
OJ 89/2, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated January 4, 1928
Schenker sends a feuilleton by Hans Liebstöckl regarding the premiere of Krenek's
opera "Jonny spielt auf."
-
OJ 5/7a, [14] (formerly vC 14) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated April 29, 1928
Schenker sympathizes with Cube over the hostilities he faces; contrasts his own theory to the
approach of Riemann. Has arranged for Hammer portraits to be sent to Cube [for bookshop exhibits], and directs him
to biographical information about himself. Describes the trials of his 20s, which were surpassed by the difficulties
he faced later with publishers and organizations. Upholds Joachim and Messchaert as models of performance art, and
speaks of his contact with Brahms. Asks whether Cube will be joining him in Galtür in the summer.
-
OJ 89/2, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated June 22, 1928
With thanks for birthday greetings, Schenker expresses how highly he values the
Photogrammarchiv while endorsing van Hoboken's turning down of an "honor" that he was offered. —
Schenker has, at Einstein's request, updated his entry in Riemann's Musiklexikon. — With the
success of the Urlinie through Der Tonwille, he no longer considers himself isolated.
-
OJ 13/25, [5] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 7, 1929
Rinn apologizes for the small format in which the autograph of Schubert's
minuet was reproduced for Schenker's article "Eine Rettung der klassischen Musik-Texte." He
has publicized the work, and intends to send copies of it to university music departments
and inform other newspapers and journals of it. He expresses thanks for the efforts that
Schenker made in contributing to Der Kunstwart, and for his remarks on Bruckner's Ninth
Symphony.
-
OJ 13/25, [6] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 22, 1929
Rinn tells Schenker that Alfred Einstein has expressed an interest in
promoting Schenker's work on autograph manuscripts with a notice in the Berliner
Tageblatt.
-
OJ 10/3, [113] Handwritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 30,
1929
Deutsch advises Schenker to send the manuscript [of an essay by Gerd
Albersheim] to Dr. Alfred Einstein, the editor of the Zeitschrift für
Musikwissenschaft.
-
OC B/136-138 Handwritten letter from Gerhard Albersheim to Schenker, dated March 20–21,
1930
After correction by Schenker, Albersheim has finalized an article on
Schenker's work, which he will submit to a journal. He will now prepare himself for the
state examinations.
-
OC B/139 Typewritten letter from Alfred Einstein (ZfMw) to Schenker, dated March 28,
1930
Einstein returns to Schenker an article submitted by Gerhard Albersheim. -- He
acknowledges receipt of a correction from Schenker.
-
OC 54/304 Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 10, 1930
Deutsch returns a letter from Furtwängler; he finds Vrieslander’s essay about
Schenker difficult to read. He advises him to proceed with the printing of his essay on the
"Eroica" Symphony, even if it proves possible for another publisher to take it over at a
late stage. He is still looking for someone to arrange Schubert’s piano-duet marches [for
orchestra or wind band].
-
WSLB-Hds 191.567 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 15,
[1930]
Schenker thanks Deutsch for his careful, helpful reading of the proofs
to the third Meisterwerk yearbook. -- Tomay has assigned the autography of the
foreground graphs for the second movement of the "Eroica" Symphony to an apprentice;
these are full of mistakes and will have to be done again. But Tomay’s own work, on
the third and fourth movements, is excellent. -- In a postscript, he comments on his
entry in the most recent Meyers Lexikon, and on a review of the second Meisterwerk
yearbook in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung.
-
OJ 11/54, [29] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated December 5, 1930
Hoboken depicts the abundance of music in Berlin, contrasting Furtwängler,
Klemperer and Kleiber. — He has decided to withdraw his planned financing of the
Photogramarchiv's collected edition of C. P. E. Bach.
-
OJ 10/3, [135] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 25, 1930
Deutsch’s son Peter has broken a leg ice-skating. He is devastated by the news
of Hoboken’s withdrawal of support for the C. P. E. Bach collected edition). He will discuss
the terms [of payment] regarding the third Meisterwerk yearbook in person, and advises that
review copies be sent out in January.
-
OJ 15/16, [66] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 8, 1931
Hearing that Schenker expects to complete Der freie Satz by early spring,
Weisse encourages his teacher to work systematically and unhurriedly at it. He reports on
Alfred Einstein’s defense of Schenker’s theories against Arnold Schering, and on a review of
a recent book on the Ninth Symphony in which the reviewer, Alfred Lorenz, sided with the
author against Schenker.
-
OJ 15/15, [54] Handwritten picture postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 5,
1931
Weisse reports having given a successful talk to the Society for Music
Pedagogy on the importance of counterpoint; Schenker’s concept of line made a big impression
on the audience.
-
OJ 5/18, 4 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated March 16, 1931
Schenker comments on the essays that Jonas has sent him, and the prospects for
publication.
-
OJ 12/6, [8] Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 30, [1931]
Jonas thanks Schenker for OJ 5/18, 4; — reports that his own essay and a review
of Das Meisterwerk III will appear in the Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft; — asks question
about a discussion in Der Tonwille of a Bach fugue copied out by Beethoven.
-
OJ 5/18, 6 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 1, 1931
Schenker congratulates Jonas on his forthcoming publication; — responds to his
question about the discussion in Der Tonwille of a Bach fugue copied out by Beethoven; —
encloses calling card of Mozart.
-
OJ 5/18, 5 Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 19, 1931
Schenker acknowledges OJ 12/6, [9]. — The planned collection essays is
premature: 1,000 Marks is better spent on new works. — But the collection should be a
selection.
-
OJ 10/3, [152] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 19, 1931
Replying to Schenker’s recent letter and postcard, Deutsch says that he will
be out of the country in the first half of September (travelling with a choir). He is
delighted with the recent review [of the third Meisterwerk yearbook], and is always happy to
see Schenker’s work praised. His wife and family have now recovered from illnesses. He is
still awaiting a letter from Drei Masken Verlag.
-
OJ 12/6, [11] Typewritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 24, 1932
Furtwängler liked his essay; Jonas describes his lectures at the Conservatory;
the situation with Einstein over publishing his review of Meisterwerk 3; asks about
permission to consult Brahms's arrangement of Saul.
-
OJ 5/18, 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 9, 1932
Schenker has presented Furtwängler with a copy of Brahms's arrangement of
Handel's Saul, has told him of Jonas's plan for Furtwängler to perform it, and asked him to give
Jonas access to the score.
-
OJ 12/6, [13] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated July 14, 1932
Jonas reports on his visit to Berlin, where he failed to meet with Furtwängler; —
discusses Brahms-Handel Saul and Beethoven Op. 109. — He has heard about the Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln
from Hoboken and Salzer; — discusses plans for publishing his Das Wesen des musikalischen
Kunstwerkes. — Has received books from Alfred Einstein.
-
OJ 12/6, [15] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 5, 1932
Jonas encloses sample page-make-up by Saturn-Verlag, and asks Schenker to send
addresses for recipients of invitations [to subscribe]. Reports on his professional
prospects and contacts in Berlin, and on reviewing.
-
OJ 12/6, [38] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 25, [1932]
Jonas reports letter from Hoboken re subscriptions to his Einführung; also
reports re publishing (Breithaupt), reviewing (for Einstein), and imminent broadcast talks,
and teaching next academic year; also re Sandra Droucker lecture on Schenker in
Oslo.
-
OJ 12/6, [16] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated October 1, 1932
Further on Hoboken and the number of subscriptions; Jonas thanks Schenker for
approving an article about the Photogrammarchiv that he hopes will be published in Die
Musik.
-
OJ 12/6, [24] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated October 25, 1932
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 16 (not surviving); is pleased his article has
Schenker's approval; sends [text of] lecture for Schenker's judgment; result of subscription
[for Einführung] so far depressing.
-
OC 44/22 Typewritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated November 10, 1932
Jonas acknowledges letter from Schenker and gives initial list of subscribers
with number of copies; he reports on two of his latest publications.
-
OJ 5/18, 17 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, incorrectly dated September 1932 [recte:
December 1, 1932]
Schenker discusses likely sales for Jonas's Das Wesen, and will himself help
promote the book; warns Jonas against Hoboken.
-
OJ 12/6, [18] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 15, 1932
Jonas comments on Schenker's article in Der Kunstwart; reports conversation
with Furtwängler; would like to write something on Handel-Brahms Saul; has heard nothing
further from van Hoboken.
-
OJ 89/5, [13] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated December 17, 1932
Schenker thanks Hoboken for the lesson fee, and reports that as he worked through
Brahms's file of Oktaven und Quinten, he found a piece of work in his own hand! — He reports
progress on Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 12/6, [20] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 20, 1933
Van Hoboken is willing to advance 600 Mk for the Einführung; Jonas inquires,
in that regard, after the plan to reprint Schenker's Harmonielehre, indicating that he had
previously prepared a reformulation of that work for teaching purposes; — he alludes to
introductory lectures to Furtwängler concerts, and the Handel-Brahms Saul
project.
-
OJ 5/18, 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated March 22, 1933
Schenker recounts Joseph Marx's requirements for adapting his Harmonielehre
for teaching purposes, and the involvement of Alfred Kalmus at UE. — Refers to Vrieslander's
adaptation of Kontrapunkt and Jonas's of Harmonielehre. — Reports Hans Weisse's success;
alludes to the Handel-Schenker Saul project.
-
OJ 12/6, [26] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 10, 1933
Jonas asks how the music examples in Das Meisterwerk were printed, with
respect to his Das Wesen des musikalischen Kunstwerks. — In Riemann's Musiklexikon, ed. A.
Einstein, Einstein's reference to Schenker appears under "Bach."
-
OJ 12/6, [27] Typewritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 18, 1933
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 32; requests copy of Schenker's Syrische Tänze;
quotes from Schenker's entry in a Jewish lexicon. — He reports on local conditions; has
heard nothing from van Hoboken.
-
OJ 5/18, 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 21, 1933
Schenker sends article [by Citkowitz]. — In response to Jonas's quoting from a
Jewish lexikon, he refers to the sermons by Cardinal Faulhaber, and writes of his pride in
being Jewish but in having assimilated thoroughly enough to establish favorable relations
with the Catholic church, antisemites, and the news media. — Implying a parallel between
himself and Jesus, he offers his "monotheistic theory of music" as "a new message to the
world from the Jews." — He has no copy of his Syrische Tänze; — writes of the work's
history.