-
CA 1-2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 8, 1905
This is Schenker's initial approach to Cotta: he asks the firm to consider
publishing volume I of his Neue Musikalische Theorien und Phantasien, explains his
anonymity, points out the book's attacks of certain composers, explains his choice of
preferred publisher.
-
OJ 9/6, [44] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated November 8,
1905
In this significant letter, Eugen d'Albert agrees [to help Schenker find
a publisher for his Harmonielehre] and has already written to Brockhaus. He seeks to
interest Schenker in his new opera "Flauto Solo," the première of which, in Prague,
is in four days' time.
-
OJ 9/31, [1] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated November 9,
1905
Cotta regrets that it is unable to undertake Schenker's book.
-
OJ 9/31, [2] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Eugen d’Albert, dated November 14,
1905
Following Eugen d'Albert's intervention on Schenker's behalf, Cotta is asking
to see the manuscript of Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [3] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated November 15,
1905
Cotta will consider Schenker's proposal further, and asks for sight of the
manuscript.
-
OJ 9/6, [45a] Handwritten letter from Eugen d’Albert to Schenker, undated [c. November 18,
1905]
Having recommended Schenker's Harmonielehre to J. G. Cotta, publisher,
Eugen d'Albert hands the matter over to Schenker. He proposes a meeting after his
recital on November 23, and thanks Schenker for attending the première of his opera
"Flauto solo" in Prague.
-
CA 5-6 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 22, 1905
Schenker submits the manuscript of Harmonielehre; asks Cotta not to show it to
potential rivals.
-
OJ 9/31, [4] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 5,
1905
Cotta agrees to publish Harmonielehre. — It estimates the extent of the book,
the cost to Schenker, and his likely takings.
-
CA 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 10, 1905
Schenker returns his contract signed, and promises the Afterword
soon.
-
OJ 9/31, [5] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 12,
1905
Cotta sends Schenker a copy of the contract with their signature; they
estimate publication at c.March 1906.
-
OJ 9/31, [6] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 27,
1906
Cotta sends a list of music examples that are missing from Schenker's
material.
-
CA 12-13 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 5, 1906
Schenker discusses the pros and cons of placement of music examples in
Harmonielehre and of the captions; he asks to receive in future
galley-proofs.
-
OJ 9/31, [7] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated February 7,
1906
Cotta will in future send galley-proofs.
-
CA 15 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 15, 1906
Covering letter enclosing sheets and examples.
-
CA 16 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 26, 1906
Covering letter enclosing manuscript pages and music examples, and summarizing
the state of play.
-
CA 17 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated March 2, 1906
Covering letter enclosing proofs of gathering 3.
-
CA 18 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 2, 1906
Covering letter enclosing batch of music examples with text
commentaries.
-
CA 19 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 3, 1906
Schenker asks for two marginal rubrics to be corrected.
-
CA 21 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 2, 1906
Schenker follows up on his telegram (CA 20) and makes a suggestion about
numbering.
-
CA 22 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 16, 1906
Schenker sends more manuscript and proofs of Harmonielehre.
-
CA 23 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 25, 1906
About numbering of music examples. — Schenker asks for more postal
wrappers.
-
CA 25 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 29, 1906
Schenker suggests that Harmonielehre be published in two volumes, indicating
that the Afterword has grown in size. — He asks for further galley-proofs.
-
OJ 9/31, [8] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated May 31,
1906
Cotta advises against splitting Harmonielehre into two volumes, and recommends
restriction of the size of the Nachwort.
-
OJ 9/31, [9] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 5,
1906
Cotta advises against publishing the Nachwort simultaneously with the
Harmoneilehre.
-
CA 29 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 25, 1906
Schenker is correcting proofs of the remaining text, and asks for the missing
music examples.
-
OJ 9/31, [10] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 27,
1906
Cotta asks for return of proofs as soon as possible; setting of music examples
is delayed.
-
CA 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 30, 1906
Schenker returns proofs, and draws two things to the attention of the
type-setter.
-
CA 32 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 2, 1906
Schenker explains Ex. 173 of Harmonielehre and makes suggestions as to the
layout.
-
CA 33 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 9, 1906
Schenker gives his summer address.
-
CA 34 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 18, 1906
Schenker returns final proofs of gatherings 17 and 18 of Harmonielehre, and
asks for gathering 20.
-
CA 35 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 23, 1906
Schenker asks for mailings to be sent to his Vienna.
-
CA 36 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 29, 1906
Schenker asks for ties.
-
OJ 9/31, [11] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated August 30,
1906
Cotta promises further proofs of Harmonielehre, and asks Schenker not to makes
large additions.
-
CA 38 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 1, 1906
Schenker's wishes are those of Cotta.
-
CA 39 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 19, 1906
Schenker reports an error in the numbering of music examples in the
Harmonielehre proofs.
-
OJ 9/31, [12] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 24,
1906
Cotta urges swift return of proofs, stresses the need to publish before
Christmas, and requests copy of the title-page.
-
CA 41-42 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 1, 1906
Schenker goes back on his earlier agreement with Cotta, and makes an
impassioned case for including the "Nachwort" as Section 3 of Part II of
Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [13] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 2,
1906
Cotta gives pressing reasons why Harmonielehre must be published by
November.
-
OJ 9/31, [14] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 8,
1906
Cotta expresses satisfaction that Schenker has decided to separate the
"Nachwort" from publication of Harmonielehre.
-
CA 46 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 11, 1906
Revised proofs of the final gatherings of Harmonielehre have been sent, and
title-page will be sent shortly.
-
CA 48 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 15, 1906
Schenker asks for more postal ties.
-
CA 51 Telegram draft or carbon copy from Cotta to Schenker, dated November 3,
1906
Cotta requests duplicate of gathering 28.
-
CA 50 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 3, 1906
Schenker submits further final proofs for Harmonielehre.
-
CA 54-55 Stenographically handwritten letter(carbon copy) and account from Cotta to Schenker,
dated November 10, 1906
Cotta informs Schenker that Harmonielehre is printed, sends complimentary
copies, and encloses its account.
-
CA 58 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated November 24, 1906
Schenker lists the journals for which the five music critics (as listed in CA
56) to receive review copies write.
-
OJ 12/27, [1] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated November 26,
1906
Cotta acknowledges receipt of money for [printing and marketing of]
Harmonielehre.
-
CA 60 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 3, 1906
Schenker asks for a further review copy to be sent to Richard
Robert.
-
OJ 12/27, [2] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 4,
1906
Cotta has carried out wishes expressed in CA 60.
-
OJ 9/6, [46] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated December 15,
1906
Eugen d'Albert asks Schenker to put the word out to the Viennese press
that he was deliberately kept in the dark over the première of his opera "Flauto
Solo" at the Vienna Court Opera and feels much aggrieved. Lothar has not contacted
him.
-
CA 61 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 27, 1906
Schenker asks for a copy to be sent to Eugen d'Albert.
-
OJ 12/27, [3] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 29,
1906
Cotta has sent a complimentary copy of Harmonielehre to Eugen
d'Albert.
-
OJ 9/31, [15] Printed letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 2, 1907
Cotta announces that Robert Kröner is now a partner, and gives his form of
signature.
-
OJ 12/27, [4] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 7,
1907
Cotta inquires whether Schenker's name may be divulged.
-
CA 64 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 8, 1907
Schenker replies that anonymity re Harmonielehre must be
maintained.
-
CA 65 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated March 8, 1907
Schenker asks for a copy of Harmonielehre to be sent to Karl
Goldmark.
-
CA 66 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated March 30, 1907
Schenker asks for a review copy of Harmonielehre to be sent to Max
Graf.
-
CA 67 Stenographically handwritten letter (carbon copy) from Cotta to Schenker, dated
April 2, 1907
Cotta report that they sent a copy for review to the Österreichische Rundschau
in February.
-
OJ 12/27, [5] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 5,
1907
Cotta encloses 1906 sales report for Harmonielehre.
-
CA 68 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 13, 1907
Schenker expects the press to be enthusiastic about Harmonielehre. — He
comments of the "Riemann school."
-
OJ 9/31, [16] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 16,
1907
Cotta hopes for the manuscript of Kontrapunkt [I] soon, and asserts that the
same terms of contract will apply as those for Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 12/27, [10] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 12,
1907
Cotta enclose a letter from Karl Grunsky and inquire whether they may disclose
Schenker's name to him as the author of Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 9/31, [17] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 18,
1907
Cotta note the review of Harmonielehre by Max Burkhart, and look forward to
receiving the manuscript of Kontrapunkt shortly.
-
CA 73 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 3, 1908
Schenker asks for the review of his Harmonielehre by Karl Grunsky to be sent
to him.
-
CA 74 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 16, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to
Busoni.
-
OJ 5/15, [1] Incomplete handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Grunsky, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker has not responded to Grunsky's invitation because of pressure of work
with Kontrapunkt. — He thanks Grunsky for his review of Harmonielehre; justifies favoring
the piano repertory there; remarks on Strauss and Reger with respect to "good" and "bad." —
He refers to his Formenlehre as vol. III of his Neue musikalische Theorien und
Phantasien.
-
OJ 5/35, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker makes a first approach to Rudorff; it concerns interpretation of a
passage in Chopin's Ballade No. 2, Op. 38; — He asserts his belief in consulting -- and
teaching students to consult -- only original sources, and in the Urtext
principle.
-
CA 75 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 8, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to Theodor
Frimmel.
-
OJ 11/10, [12] Handwritten picture postcard from Frimmel to Schenker, dated February 20,
1908
Frimmel thanks Schenker for his complimentary copy of the latter's
Harmonielehre.
-
CA 76 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 24, 1908
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde; — He seeks advice regarding Theodor Frimmel and the Beethoven-Jahrbuch,
explaining the delay on Kontrapunkt I.
-
OJ 9/31, [18] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated April 25,
1908
Cotta has sent a copy of Harmonielehre to the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde,
and thinks that pre-publication excerpting of Kontrapunkt would be
advantageous.
-
OJ 11/29, [1] Handwritten letter from Grunsky to Schenker, dated May 3, 1908
Grunsky thanks Schenker for revealing his identity as author of Harmonielehre.
— He asks Schenker's views on Bruckner, and on his own views of musical
form.
-
OJ 5/15, [2]-[3] Handwritten incomplete draft of a letter from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [?c. June
1, 1908]
Responding to Grunsky's request, Schenker gives his assessment of Bruckner's
music. First exploring common ground between him and Grunsky, he then offers "technical
reasons" why he regards Bruckner as "possessing minimal powers of invention," therefore
cannot call him a "master." In the process, he compares the "Komponisten" (composers) of the
present day unfavorably with the "Tonsetzer" (tonal craftsmen) of the past.
-
OJ 9/31, [19] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 2,
1908
Cotta asks if they may divulge Schenker's name to Rudolf
Breithausen.
-
CA 79 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 5, 1908
Schenker gives permission to divulge his name as author of Harmonielehre to
Breithaupt.
-
WSLB 8 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 16, 1908
Schenker sends the text of his Foreword for Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 23, 1908
Schenker promises a list of people in German to receive complimentary copies of
Ornamentik, and a new proposal.
-
OJ 9/32, [4] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1, 1908
Invoice for copies of Harmonielehre to Busoni, the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde, and Löwe.
-
OJ 12/27, [6] Cover letter for sales report from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 9,
1908
Cotta encloses 1907 sales report for Harmonielehre and notifies him of his
share of the sales profits.
-
OJ 5/35, [2] Handwritten draft or letter-copy from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, undated [September
17, 1908]
Schenker is pleased at Rudorff's agreement with his ideas in the Beitrag zur
Ornamentik, and speaks of his difficulties with the Viennese music profession. — He takes
leave to have a copy of his Harmonielehre dispatched to Rudorff.
-
CA 80 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 13 and 17,
1908
Schenker promises Counterpoint soon and speculates on publication by
Christmas; — Asks for a copy of Harmonielehre to be sent to his sister
Sophie.
-
OJ 12/27, [7] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 18,
1908
Cotta looks forward to receiving Kontrapunkt, and has sent copies of
Harmonielehre to Sophie Guttmann and Ernst Rudorff.
-
CA 82 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 23, 1908
Schenker has dispatched the manuscript for Kontrapunkt.
-
OJ 12/27, [8] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 26,
1908
Cotta acknowledges receipt of the manuscript of Kontrapunkt.
-
CA 84 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 27, 1908
Schenker promises the remainder of Kontrapunkt in a few days.
-
OJ 5/35, [3] Handwritten draft or letter-copy from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated September 28,
1908
Schenker comments on Wagner's alterations to Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and
outlines his own plans, wishing to see Wagner reduced to the same subordinate place as Gluck
[unaware of the provocation this will be to Rudorff!]. — He takes issue with Beyschlag's
interpretation of the turn in Haydn's music.
-
OJ 5/15, [4] Incomplete handwritten letter draft from Schenker to Grunsky, undated [?between
September 23 and December 31, 1908]
Schenker reports progress on his Kontrapunkt. — The main problem in music is
"how length can be produced." — He recollects his love for the pious Bruckner, and his
admiration for the latter's music, but speaks of its "defects," comparing the music
favorably with that of Tchaikovsky. Bruckner's stumbling block was form.
-
CA 85 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 8, 1908
Schenker proposed that Kontrapunkt be divided into two
half-volumes.
-
OJ 12/27, [9] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 9,
1908
Cotta advises against splitting Kontrapunkt into two
half-volumes.
-
OJ 5/6, [2] Draft of handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, undated [October 12?,
1908]
Schenker accepts Cotta's verdict against splitting Kontrapunkt into
two.
-
CA 87 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 13, 1908
Schenker accepts Cotta's verdict against splitting Kontrapunkt into
two.
-
OJ 9/31, [20] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 15,
1908
Cotta states that Kontrapunkt will be produced under the terms of the contract
for Harmonielehre.
-
CA 89 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 17, 1908
Schenker confirms the terms of the Harmonielehre contract as applying to
Kontrapunkt.
-
WSLB 24 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 31, 1908
The prospect of an English translation of Beitrag zur Ornamentik pleases
Schenker. — He wants to guide UE toward being a global enterprise. — Proofs of Counterpoint
[I] have started arriving from Cotta.
-
OC 52/444 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 7, 1908
Hertzka details the distribution of first copies of the
Instrumentations-Tabelle. — He makes a bid to publish Kontrapunkt.
-
WSLB 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 22, 1908
Schenker agrees to the Instrumentations-Tabelle being published without his newly
written Introduction. — He declines the proposal to edit the Well-tempered Clavier Book II for
the new Akademie, offerin alternative suggestions and observations on Busoni's
editing.
-
OJ 9/31, [21] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 30,
1908
Cotta urge Schenker to return galley-proofs of Kontrapunkt.
-
WSLB 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), undated [December 31, 1908 or January
1, 1909]
Schenker defends his Introduction to the Instrumentations-Tabelle and the
exclusion of the heckelphone.
-
CA 91 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 4, 1909
Schenker explains delay in returning proofs.
-
CA 92 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated January 4, 1909
Schenker directs Cotta to divulge his name on the title-page of the 2nd edn of
Harmonielehre; — He has meanwhile added a long polemic to the Introduction of Kontrapunkt
[I].
-
WSLB 35 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), January 8, 1909
In a letter "ironic in tone" Schenker offers alternative editors for WTC Bk
II. He outlines the work that he has in hand, and regrets his unhappy experience with UE
over Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OJ 9/31, [22] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated January 14,
1909
Cotta agrees to reset the title-page of Harmonielehre with Schenker's name as
author, and to distribute the second edition coincident with the release of Kontrapunkt
I.
-
CA 94 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated April 8, 1909
Schenker inquires whether a batch of proofs has gone astray, and draws
attention to a review.
-
OJ 12/27, [11] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated April 10,
1909
Cotta promises the next batch of proofs shortly.
-
CA 96-98 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 26, 1909
Schenker raises again the splitting of Kontrapunkt into two half-volumes, or
even four installments. — He reports that his Beitrag zur Ornamentik has been adopted by the
Academy of Music, despite his being in a constant state of feud with all officialdom. — The
Academy's Director is a supporter of his theory. — Schenker outlines how earlier works of
his have become influential. — His Kontrapunkt is "eagerly awaited" and will be the "leading
work" on the subject; he argues the case for splitting the work on "psychological" and
"technical" grounds.
-
OJ 9/31, [23] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 1,
1909
Cotta accedes to splitting Kontrapunkt into two half-volumes, and proposes a
publication schedule for the first half-volume.
-
CA 102 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 3, 1909
Schenker has sent final proofs of gatherings 10 and 12, but has mislaid those
for 11 and asks for another copy.
-
WSLB-Hds 94475 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, undated [probably early July
1909]
Schenker asks Seligmann to read an essay on Byron’s Manfred and, if he thinks
it worthy of publication, to send a letter of reference to one or other Viennese newspaper.
He also expresses his satisfaction at how his career is shaping: he has requested and
received generous fees for the editions he has prepared for Universal Edition, and his
theoretical writings for Cotta are also moving along.
-
OJ 5/6, [3] Note by Schenker, dated July 5, 1909
Reflection on giving and taking in general and in art
-
CA 103 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 7, 1909
Schenker gives his summer address and asks for proofs to be sent
there.
-
CA 104 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 30, 1909
Schenker has returned to Vienna.
-
OJ 9/32, [5] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 1, 1909
Invoice for copies of Harmonielehre to Sofie Guttmann and Ernst
Rudorff.
-
OJ 5/35, [5] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated October 10,
1909
Schenker, on receipt of the score of a Rudorff choral work, praises its
textural clarity and melodic articulation, comparing them favorably to the writing of the
current generation. — He reports the success of his own recent theory works, and inroads
made into the Vienna Academy for Music and Performance Art.
-
CA 105 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 27, 1909
The wrong proofs have been sent to Schenker by mistake.
-
WSLB 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 9, 1909
Schenker resists attending a meeting with Hertzka and von Wöß regarding the
printing of his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue; asserts his rights as an
author to control over his own material; and makes claims for the introduction to his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, which was not accepted for inclusion in 1908
reprinting.
-
CA 106-107 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated December 2, 1909
Schenker explains the necessity for some late interpolations into Kontrapunkt
I. — He may be able to include the title "Professor of Composition and Theory" against his
name on the title-pages of his works, and debates the advantages of such an appointment at
the Vienna Academy against the loss of independence. — Only anonymity has prevented
Harmonielehre from success so far.
-
OJ 9/31, [24] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated December 8,
1909
Cotta welcomes the recognitions that Schenker has been accorded recently, and
hopes they will affect his work propitiously.
-
CA 110 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated February 6, 1910
Schenker asks for proof-ties.
-
CA 111 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated May 1, 1910
Schenker asks urgently for remaining galley-proofs of Counterpoint
1.
-
CA 112 Carbon copy of stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June
16, 1910
Cotta asks Schenker for manuscript of the prelims and any supplements for
Kontrapunkt I, and for a publicity blurb.
-
OJ 9/31, [25] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated June 27,
1910
Cotta reiterates the requests made in CA 112.
-
CA 114 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated June 30, 1910
Schenker promises manuscript of prelims for Kontrapunkt 1.
-
CA 115 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 4, 1910
Schenker encloses manuscript of all prelims for Kontrapunkt 1. He mentions
recent publication of his edition of J. S. Bach's Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue, and speaks of
his plans for a Handbibliothek, for which he will present a proposal to Cotta. He announces
his departure and gives his summer address.
-
CA 116 Carbon copy of stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated July
6, 1910
Cotta acknowledges receipt of the manuscript prelims of Kontrapunkt 1 and
reiterates its request for material for its publicity blurb.
-
OJ 6/4, [49] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated [July] 9, 1910
Schenker announces his arrival in the Karerpass, speaks of the costs, and
outlines his concerns over money, including money he has to send to his mother on August 1. — He
will write a letter to a female patron. — He describes the magnificence of the mountain
views.
-
CA 117 Handwritten letter and publicity material from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 17,
1910
Covering letter with draft publicity material for Kontrapunkt 1. Schenker
promises to return proof of Preface.
-
WSLB 63 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 8, 1910
Schenker has dispatched the second proof of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition from Karerpass to Vienna, and outlines his travel plans for the remaining
summer.
-
CA 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 19, 1910
A fire at his hotel causes Schenker to ask whether Cotta has sent him final
proofs recently. — He inquires whether he might travel to Stuttgart to present his plan for
the Handbibliothek in person.
-
OJ 6/4, [51] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated August 19, 1910
Schenker sends Violin 50 florins in partial repayment of a debt, expressing
anxieties about his financial situation. — No word yet from Cotta. — The effect of the hotel
fire on hotel businesses. — Emil Kornfeld arrives today.
-
OJ 9/31, [26] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated August [20?],
1910
In response to CA 118, Cotta advises Schenker to send his proposal for a
Handbibliothek in advance of a possible visit to Stuttgart to present it in
person.
-
OJ 9/32, [6] Invoice from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 4, 1910
Invoice for the printing and publishing costs of Kontrapunkt
1.
-
CA 120 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 6, 1910
Schenker asks whether Counterpoint [1] will be published in September, and
promises his "plans" soon.
-
OJ 9/32, [13] Handwritten letter and sales report for 1909 for Harmonielehre from Cotta, dated
September 6, 1910
1909 sales report for Harmonielehre, with covering letter
-
CA 121-122 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 10, 1910
Schenker explains the basis for his "Handbibliothek," suggests an overarching
title and a separate title for the proposed first booklet, on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. He
promises to return the manuscript of vol. II/1.
-
OJ 12/27, [12] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 14,
1910
In response to Schenker's outline of his prospective Handbibliothek, Cotta
advise against its publication before that of vol. III [Niedergang]; and would not be able
to entertain the project until after publication of vol. III.
-
CA 125 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 15, 1910
Schenker asks Cotta to correct the page-count for Kontrapunkt
1.
-
CA 127 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 20, 1910
Schenker asks for a copy of Kontrapunkt 1 to be sent to Ernst Rudorff and
copies of that and Harmonielehre to be sent to Jenny Kornfeld at her Aussig
address.
-
OJ 12/27, [13] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated September 21,
1910
Cotta reasserts its unwillingness to consider publication of the
[Handbibliothek] project until after publication of vol. III.
-
CA 128 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 29, 1910
Schenker asks for a review copy of Kontrapunkt 1 to be sent to Ludwig
Karpath.
-
CA 129 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 3, 1910
Schenker redirects the copies of Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt I destined for
Jenny Kornfeld to his own address in Vienna.
-
OJ 9/31, [27] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 4,
1910
Publication of Kontrapunkt 1 having taken place this day, Cotta confirms the
orders of complimentary and review copies to Jenny Kornfeld, Ernst Rudorff, Ludwig Karpath,
and Schenker himself.
-
CA 132 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 13, 1910
Schenker incloses a reaction to the Preface of Kontrapunkt 1 by Adalbert
Seligmann. —He assures Cotta that their printing and production costs bill will be paid
promptly.
-
OJ 9/31, [28] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 15,
1910
Cotta has already sent a copy of vol. II/1 to Ernst Rudorff.
-
CA 134-135 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 21, 1910
Schenker divulges the identity of his benefactor, explains why there has been
a delay in payment by the Rothschild Bank, and promises payment by sometime in
January.
-
CA 136 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 23, 1910
Schenker asks that a review copy of Kontrapunkt 1 be sent to Max Graf;
incloses a review.
-
OJ 9/31, [29] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 24,
1910
Cotta hopes that Schenker will honor his contract to pay the publishing costs
[of Kontrapunkt 1] in January.
-
CA 139 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 25, 1910
Schenker asks for a copy of his Harmonielehre to be sent to Prof. Robert Fuchs
at the Vienna Academy.
-
OJ 9/31, [30] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 26,
1910
Cotta has sent a review copy [of Kontrapunkt 1] to Max Graf and welcomes a
recent favorable notice of that work.
-
OJ 12/27, [14] Stenographically handwritten postcard from Cotta to Schenker, dated October 27,
1910
Cotta has sent a complimentary copy of Harmonielehre to Robert
Fuchs.
-
WSLB 77 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 21, 1911
Schenker asks if he will receive galley-proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie
in time to take on vacation, and inquires as to his proposal for UE to publish the score of
the Ninth Symphony with original markings. — No summons to interview with Academy President
von Wiener, so he fears the worst for the planned Bach-Beethoven edition project. — Tirade
against von Wiener and the Academy's teachers.
-
WSLB 78 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 23, 1911
Schenker asks that a copy of his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue edition be send
to Gottfried Galston. —He reports creation of his "Die Kunst des Vortrags" and "Kunst und
Kritik". —He is pleased that the Beethoven/Bach project may yet be realized, and justifies
his editorial stance with reference to Rodin and architecture, and suggests it might be
published in Germany as retribution against Bopp and Wiener. —He is working now on
Counterpoint II for Cotta.
-
WSLB 90 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 1, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and draws
attention to errors on the part of the typesetters.
-
WSLB 91 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 4, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and expresses
dismay at the inaccurate work of the typesetters, notably in type-size, marginal numbers,
and alignment within figures.
-
WSLB 116 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 2, 1912
Schenker observes acidly that the Ninth Symphony score project has been
dropped. He asks [in the face of the threat of author correction cost demands] for an
honorarium for correcting the proofs of his monograph Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. He demands
to know whether Hertzka is serious about the plan for an edition of the last five Beethoven
sonatas. He repeats his inquiry as to the number of copies of his Instrumentations-Tabelle,
2nd edition, that have so far been released.
-
WSLB 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), date June 4, 1912
Schenker urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner in connection with the planned
Organization. He reiterates his demands regarding payment for the planned last five
Beethoven sonata edition, specifying the sums, and disputes Hertzka's
counterargument.
-
OJ 5/14, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to the Gustav Marchet (Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde), dated September 27, 1912
Schenker details to the President of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Gustav
Marchet, letters that he has received from the Society's General Secretary, Carl Lafite; he
lodges his complaint at the way in which he has been treated, which he considers impolite and
publicly demeaning, and withdraws his offer of lectures.
-
WSLB-Hds 95654 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated July 24, 1916
Schenker tells Seligmann that he has arranged for copies of his critical
editions of Beethoven’s Op. 110 and Op. 111 to be sent to him. He speaks of the positive
interest his works have received in Germany, and about Hugo Riemann asking him to provide
autobiographical material for an entry in the next edition of his music
lexicon.
-
OC 1 B/23 Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Siegfried Türkel, dated March 17,
1917
Schenker encloses a letter from Dr. Hugo Friedmann and comments on it,
ridiculing the lack of sophistication of the wealthy, and asserting his own indifference to
money.
-
OJ 11/35, 5 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated July 2, 1917
Halm seeks advice on choice of edition for the Beethoven variations, and offers
advice in negotiating with publishers.
-
DLA 69.930/1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, July 8, 1917
Schenker acknowledges Halm's letter; he discusses the relative merits of editions
of Beethoven variations, and looks forward to seeing Halm's review of his "Beethoven editions";
he is putting the finishing touches to Kontrapunkt 2.
-
OJ 11/35, 9b Handwritten postcard from Halm to Schenker, dated July 21, 1917
Halm thanks Schenker for arranging that Cotta send him NMTP vols. I and
II/1.
-
OC 52/559 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 5, 1918
Hertzka will inquire about a review published in Lausanne; has dispatched Op. 111
to Steglich and encloses invoice and payment order; in light of Brest-Litovsk, he inquires about
Kontrapunkt2 and the Kleine Bibibliothek.
-
WSLB 302 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), May 18, 1919
Schenker reminds Hertzka of Hans Weisse's doctoral dissertation, Der Kunstwalzer,
and recommends it for publication. He laments, in provocatively vulgar language, that the
Viennese have become subservient to the French.
-
OC 52/923 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 6, 1919
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of WSLB 302; he cannot entertain early publication
of Weisse's work but wishes to get to know it now. — He hopes to have work from Schenker's pen
as soon as work for Cotta is finished. — He proposes that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf
Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be omitted [in an future edition].
-
OJ 10/3, [12] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated July 12,
1920
Deutsch has written to Edward Speyer about the sketchleaf [of the "Moonlight"
Sonata], and wishes Schenker success with his contract for the Little Library and Complete
Edition.
-
OJ 10/1, [56] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated August 19, 1920
Dahms is having difficulty obtaining a passport, but still hopes to see Schenker
this summer, perhaps in Munich. — He sends his three biographical books to Schenker, but is
apprehensive of the latter's reaction to their hemeneutic elements; he hopes to writes something
more fitting.
-
OJ 8/3, [89] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 23, 1920
Gives date of return to Vienna, and confirms Tuesday meeting.
-
OJ 5/18, [E] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated September 27, 1920
Schenker is unable to give Jonas lessons, and suggests Felix Hupka.
-
OJ 8/3, [91] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October
16, 1920
Schenker is curious how Violin gets on with Ferdinand Pfohl. — Is Violin seeking
a teaching position in Hamburg? — Reports on delivery of Kontrapunkt 2 to Cotta. — Will visit
Wally next Sunday.
-
OC 52/239-240 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 18, 1920
Hertzka and Schenker will discuss the Niloff Instrumentations-Tabelle; Hertzka
offers two alternative solutions to UE's taking over of Kontrapunkt 2.
-
OC 52/561 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated December 30, 1920
Hertzka wishes to discuss the transfer of Kontrapunkt 2 in person. He also wishes
urgently to discuss "The Mission of German Genius." [This crucial letter marks the beginning of
the deterioration of relations between Schenker, Hertzka, and UE between 1920 and 1925.]
-
OC 52/244 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 12, 1921
Hertzka sends contracts for NMTP and Kontrapunkt 2, and discusses the take-over
from Cotta, requesting Schenker's estimate of remaining stocks, and asking whether changes would
be required in a second edition of Kontrapunkt I.
-
OJ 8/4, [2] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 6, 1921
Schenker congratulates Violin on obtaining a teaching post in Hamburg and reports
on progress on his written work and publications.
-
OJ 10/1, [62] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated April 4, 1921
Dahms asks Schenker to recommend him to Cotta re: the book he is writing on
Italian opera.
-
OJ 10/1, [63] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 17, 1921
Dahms sends birthday greetings. — Cotta has turned down his book proposal. — He
will soon obtain a passport and hopes to visit the Schenkers during the summer.
-
OJ 11/35, 19 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated July 28, 1921
Halm discusses an "intended gift," and the merits of Matthäus Hentz and K. T. Schmid to
receive it. Halm reports that he has moved from Esslingen to Wickersdorf, and that his Concerto for Large
Orchestra has been performed by Fritz Busch in Stuttgart, and comments on Cotta's hand-over of
Kontrapunkt.
-
OJ 8/4, [8] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 23, 1921
Schenker alerts Violin to the imminent arrival of a payment.
-
OJ 14/45, [17] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Apparently having returned from a visit to Vienna, Violin expresses his joy at
having seen Schenker recently.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Wilhelm Furtwängler, dated April 19,
1930
Schenker is willing to hand over an unidentified "book" [Meisterwerk III] to
Breitkopf & Härtel on condition that publication not be delayed; he refers to dealings with
other publishers and plans for future publications.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.568 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 23, 1930
Schenker is sending Deutsch copies of letters written by Leo Kestenberg
praising his theories for their practical application to composition and
performance, noting that Furtwängler is championing his cause everywhere. -- He then
launches into a tirade against the city of Vienna for snubbing him and his
work.
-
NYnscl MP.0008.01/1/1, 2 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Arthur Waldeck, dated November 8,
1932
Schenker stipulates the conditions for granting publication rights for a
translation of his Harmonielehre, and asks which other Schenkerians in the U.S. Waldeck is
acquainted with.
-
OC 30/18-30 Draft letter from Schenker to Albert Einstein, undated [November 20,
1932]
In this unsent letter, Schenker tells Einstein about his works and the
difficulties he has encountered in promoting them, and calls upon the physicist for help in
gaining financial support for the publication of Free Composition.
-
OJ 89/6, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated February 17, 1933
Congratulating Hoboken on his forthcoming marriage to Frl. Boy, Schenker
reports that Kalmus is playing a devious financial game over Oktaven u. Quinten (which is in
press) and Der freie Satz (which he thinks will take two years to publish) that may yet see
the latter revert to Cotta. — He speaks of Marx's naiveté over the proposed school version
of Harmonielehre. — He reports on the remaining stocks of Das Meisterwerk in der
Musik.
-
OJ 15/22, [10] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 5,
1935
Willfort lays out his plans for an abbreviated edition of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, and explains his negotiations with Alfred Kalmus of UE.