-
CA 34 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 18, 1906
Schenker returns final proofs of gatherings 17 and 18 of Harmonielehre, and
asks for gathering 20.
-
OJ 11/36, [2] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated September 17, [1913]
Hammer cannot afford Schenker's fee; he dislikes the modern piano and has a Stein
grand piano, a Hammerklavier copy, and a clavichord.
-
OJ 15/5, [2] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated September 17,
1918
Waechter tries again to elicit contributions from Schenker to Das Neue
Oesterreich, and asks Schenker's opinion on an analysis of a Schubert song. Schenker's
honorarium for lessons is too high.
-
OJ 5/43, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Eberhard von Waechter, dated September 28,
1918
Schenker thanks Waechter for sending some of his work and praises it for being on
the right path toward genius; he questions musical education and existing music periodicals.
-
OC 52/923 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 6, 1919
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of WSLB 302; he cannot entertain early publication
of Weisse's work but wishes to get to know it now. — He hopes to have work from Schenker's pen
as soon as work for Cotta is finished. — He proposes that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf
Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be omitted [in an future edition].
-
WSLB 303 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 12, 1919
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art, life, and politics are inextricably interconnected. He claims
that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long run. His sole concern is
with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
OJ 15/5, [3] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated September 2,
1919
Waechter is sending copy of his Schubert study, and offers to send the manuscript
of his forthcoming book for Schenker's assessment.
-
OJ 10/3, [2] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated September 8, 1913
Deutsch encloses part of a letter from Ludwig Scheibler, which he says will interest Schenker. He
has finished work on two volumes of his documentary biography.
-
OJ 15/5, [4] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated October 1,
1919
Waechter asks for an article on performance for Der Merker, remarking that
analysis takes the performer only so far, after which the latter's feelings must take over. He
praises Schenker's prowess in analysis, and asks again if he may send the manuscript of his
latest book for Schenker's appraisal.
-
OJ 10/3, [5] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8,
1920
Deutsch reports that Hertzka wants the music connoisseur edition of the
"Moonlight" Sonata to include facsimiles only, not textually cleaned editions. Deutsch
outlines the basis of the contract (editors will receive 8% of the retail price) and the
production timetable. He asks if Schenker would rather take on a different facsimile due to
competition from a Copenhagen publisher. Schenker's Theory of Harmony was not it stock in
Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [6] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 9,
1920
Deutsch is sorry that a customer prevented him for speaking with the Schenkers
when they visited his store. Photographic originals will be needed for the connoisseur
edition.
-
OC B/169 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated dated January 22,
1920
-
OJ 10/3, [23] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 30,
1921
The overdue ["Moonlight" Sonata edition] contract is finally ready, and
Deutsch hopes that Schenker is happy with the wording. The Bonn photographs are also ready.
Schenker should expect to receive an edited version of his commentary, and perhaps also an
English translation.
-
OJ 10/3, [28] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 14, 1922
Deutsch offers to provide several books to Schenker instead of two or three hardback copies of the
"Moonlight" Sonata edition, and then details several misprints and factual errors in Romain Rolland's biography
of Beethoven.
-
OJ 11/36, [5] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated March 23, 1922
Hammer praises Schenker's edition of Bach's Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
raising an issue about fingering on the clavichord.— He inquires after Tonwille 2, and hopes to
visit Schenker in Vienna soon.
-
OJ 10/3, [37] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 26, 1922
Deutsch reports that Drei Masken will not publish a facsimile edition of Beethoven's "Spring"
Sonata Op. 24, and will instead publish editions of Beethoven's Piano Sonata in F-sharp Op. 78, a string quartet
by Haydn, and Schubert's Winterreise and B minor Symphony.
-
OJ 10/3, [38] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 30, 1922
Deutsch apologizes for the delay to Schenker's payment for the "Moonlight"
Sonata facsimile edition, for which Deutsch himself is to blame. Schenker's debt to Seidel's
Book Dealership is 301 marks and 300 kronen, which should be balanced by his income from the
facsimile edition.
-
OJ 10/3, [39] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 29, 1922
Deutsch provides a full overview of Schenker income from the current sales reported by Universal
Edition of the "Moonlight" Sonata facsimile edition, and also his debts at Seidel's Book Dealership; Schenker
owes Deutsch 76.65 marks. Deutsch is dissatisfied with Universal Edition's behavior with respect to the
publication.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OJ 5/45, [3] Copy, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, of a letter from Schenker to Weisse, dated September
12, 1923
Schenker explains his behavior a few days before, in reply to Weisse’s letter of
September 7, and his implicit displeasure at his pupil's lengthy trip to Italy in the summer.
-
JOB 94-3, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated October 24, 1923
Schenker invites Hammer and his wife for November 7; — The problem of the
"middleman" (performer, etc.) in music, by contrast with painting; — he reports on Hertzka's
proposal to make Tonwille a quarterly publication.
-
DLA 69.930/12 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated April 3‒4, 1924
In response to matters raised by Halm in two previous letters, Schenker discusses
figuration, distinguishing between that which works only on the surface and that which arises
out of the middle and background, drawing on primal intervals. He also concedes that he heard
Bruckner improvising, and criticizes it adversely. He refers to Reger, and outlines plans for
forthcoming volumes of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 10/3, [40] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 9, 1924
Deutsch thanks Schenker for the most recent (sixth) issue of Tonwille. He read Schenker's comments
on Schubert's "Gretchen am Spinnrade" (Op. 2) with great interest, although he did not fully understand them.
Deutsch encloses an announcement from the publisher Vieweg that may be of interest to Schenker.
-
DLA 69.930/13 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated October 6, 1924
Asks Halm to send some of his chamber music to Rudolf Pollak, with prospect of
performance of the A major string quartet. —Deplores current situation over Sofie Deutsch
stipends. —Reports difficulties with UE and intention to change publisher.
-
OC 54/5-7 Draft letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated as sent on December 9,
1924
In the light of an exchange of letters with UE, Schenker suggests that the new
publication have a new title (Die Urlinie) but that the old typeface and format be retained.
He suggests that the new periodical should include articles on each of the Chopin etudes and
the four Brahms symphonies, and on symphonies by Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert and Haydn, from
all of which book-length studies could subsequently be made.
-
OJ 14/45, [41] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 19, 1925
Violin reports on a successful concert in which he performed both as a soloist
and with the Klingler String Quartet. He thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10. He has received a copy
of Hans Weisse’s recent vocal quartets, and is puzzled by how a limited talent can write such
good music. He is going to see Max Temming, and has received four courteous letters of
acknowledgement from university music departments for copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 9/34, [1] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 21, 1925
Cube has had to extend his holiday to take care of his father, who has been forced to abandon his
second marriage under pressure from his firm.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.557 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated October 18, 1925
Responding to Deutsch's request, Schenker sends his text for inclusion in the forthcoming
Schubert issue of Moderne Welt, and invites the Deutsches for an afternoon snack.
-
OJ 10/3, [41] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 20, 1925
Deutsch thanks Schenker for quickly providing his text [for the forthcoming Schubert issue of
Moderne Welt]. He has written to Thomas Mann regarding the reference to Schubert's "Der Lindenbaum" in Mann's
novel Der Zauberberg. The Deutsches accept Schenker's invitation for an afternoon snack, but can only come on a
Sunday after Novemeber 2.
-
OJ 10/3, [42] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 6, 1925
Deutsch informs Schenker that due to space constraints the editors have (without Deutsch's prior
knowledge) cut the first four paragraphs of Schenker's article, leaving only the last two paragraphs, which
refer particularly to Schubert. He asks Schenker to agree to this cut, but also offers him the option of
removing his article so that it can be used in full elsewhere. Deutsch asks Schenker to look at a Beethoven
manuscript at Heck's.
-
OJ 10/3, [44] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 22, 1925
Deutsch enjoyed today's afternoon tea at the Schenkers and will return the Vrieslander and Hammer
books to Schenker tomorrow. He asks Schenker to speak to Hoboken about the possibility of him purchasing
Deutsch's collection of Schubert first editions.
-
OJ 14/45, [110] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 5, 1925
Violin gives Schenker the program of his concerts with van den Berg and
Buxbaum.
-
OJ 11/51, [1] Typed letter from Hindemith to Schenker, dated October 25, 1926
Finding his name mentioned adversely in Meisterwerk 1, Hindemith writes that
he has always striven to fulfill in his own work the fundamental truths that are stated in
Schenker's books. He encloses two scores, and is convinced Schenker will find the Urlinie in
them.
-
OJ 5/17, [1, vsn 1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Hindemith, undated [November 3, 1926]
In response to Hindemith's letter of October 25, 1926, Schenker's 15-page first
draft states his preference for a meeting with Hindemith in Vienna. Schenker thinks differently
from Hindemith: the notion of a "good musician" is a delusion; artistic property is comparable
with material property; the music of today is quite different from that of the past, the rules
of the masterworks do not govern it, hence it is not art at all. Schenker reserves the right to
speak his own mind.
-
OC 54/111 Typed letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8, 1927
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his recent communications, including a copy of the
contract with Drei Masken Verlag for the Meisterwerk Yearbook, and asks for a copy of
relevant extracts from the correspondence with the publishers. He reports progress in the
establishment of a Photogram Archive at the Austrian National Library, with the cooperation
of Dr Robert Haas and financial support from Anthony van Hoboken; similar plans to
photographically reproduce autograph manuscripts are underway at the Beethoven House in
Bonn, and (for manuscripts of Bach and Handel) also in England. He advises Schenker that
proofs will start arriving from the printing-house Waldheim in a few weeks, and expresses
his delight in being able to assist Schenker in the promotion of his work.
-
OJ 9/34, [6] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 24, 1927
Acknowledges Schenker's reply and corrections. There will be no problem with his
teacher's examination in May. Reports on recent activities.
-
OJ 15/16, [58] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 27, 1927
Weisse congratulates Schenker on the publication of the second Meisterwerk
Yearbook, of which has expresses mainly admiration. But he is unhappy with Schenker's dismissal
of the fugue from Reger's Variations and Fugue on a theme of Bach, and with his reading of the
Urlinie in Schubert's Waltz Op. 9 (D. 365), No. 5, and Beethoven's Sonata Op. 10, No.
2.
-
OJ 11/54, [23] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 21, 1928
Hoboken has still made no progress on photographic work at the Paris
Conservatory. — He will go to Rotterdam and Münster. — Speaks of the importance of his Archive
work and contacts he has made. Will probably go to a concert featuring music of Alban Berg. — He
asks Schenker to intervene with O. E. Deutsch.
-
OJ 89/2, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated March 26, 1928
Schenker conveys Deutsch's response to van Hoboken's questioning of a planned
facsimile of Schubert sketches. — Schenker discusses strategy for persuading Paris to supply
photographs for the Photogrammarchiv.
-
OJ 10/18, [3] Handwritten letter from Elias to Schenker, dated July 11, 1928
Miss Elias is glad that Schenker is "not dissatisfied" with her graphings of
his piano piece Op. 4, No. 1 and looks forward to her October lessons for a detailed
discussion. — She inquires about Vrieslander's "monograph." — She was interested to see the
autograph and first edition of "Erlkönig" juxtaposed in a Schubert
exhibition.
-
OJ 14/45, [71] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 18, 1928
Owing to a "complete breakdown," Violin is recovering at a sanatorium in
Schierke, from where he writes. In response to Schenker's previous postcard, Violin had
written more than once to Prof. [Fritz?] Stein for the return of the manuscript of a Handel
arrangement by Schenker, and he will chase him up in August. A pupil of his, Harry Hahn, has
taken upon himself to lecture on Schenker's theories at the local society of composers; for
this he has prepared classroom-size enlargements of voice-leading graphs of a Bach prelude
and a Schubert waltz, and has proved a surprisingly competent and persuasive
speaker.
-
OJ 5/7a, [19] (formerly vC 19) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 29, 1928
Schenker has received large-format Urlinie charts from Harry Hahn and recommends
format to Cube.
-
OJ 9/34, [14] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1928
Cube acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [18] and [19], and comments; reports on his own recent activities and
plans, and on events in the Conservatory, on a forthcoming Schubert festival, and Radio Vienna. He is about to
return the Hammer etching.
-
OJ 9/34, [15] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 7, 1928
Cube reports his activities in Cologne, especially his work with Heinrich Lemacher, who is a
"connoisseur of the Urlinie"; reports on his compositions. Will visit Hupka and Albersheim next
time.
-
OJ 5/7a, [21] (formerly vC 21) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 20, 1928
Sends best wishes for Cologne lecture-series; is planning to issue a folder of
Urlinien for use by teachers, and may deposit his handwritten Urlinien in the Photogrammarchiv,
which will be officially opened on November [25]. The "counter-examples" should be taken
slowly.
-
OJ 10/1, [103] Typewritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 23, 1928
Dahms is unable to attend the Schubert conference in Vienna. — His latest
appeals on marital situation have been rejected.
-
OJ 8/4, [60] Handwritten poscard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 22,
1928
The Schenkers send the Violins their best wishes.
-
OJ 13/25, [4] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated February 7, 1929
Rinn reports that publication of "Eine Rettung der klassischen Musik-Texte"
must be delayed because a copy of the faulty Peters edition of Schubert's Sonata (Op. 78, in
G major), which is the subject of Schenker's essay, cannot be found anywhere in Munich. He
asks Schenker to send him his own copy, so that it can be used for the reproduction of the
musical text. He also mentions the death of August Halm, and his intention of marking the
event in the same issue in which Schenker's article is now to appear.
-
OJ 11/54, [25] Typed letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 27, 1929
Hoboken has broken off his friendship with Otto Vrieslander after discovering
that the latter has been cheating him.
-
OJ 89/3, [5] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated July 22,
1929
Hoboken gives his view on Vrieslander's honorarium demand.— He is not yet
finished with analyzing Brahms Op. 117, No. 1.
-
OC 52/853 Typed letter from Ernst Roth (UE) to Schenker, with enclosure, dated August 5,
1929
Encloses additional remarks by Edmund Schmid.
-
OJ 5/7a, [27] (formerly vC 27) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 10, 1929
Schenker reponds, on information from Reinhard Oppel, to Cube's question in OJ
9/34, [19] about finding a publisher; advises Cube to seek friends who will play his music,
after which publication should ensue. Schenker gives detailed comments, with music examples, on
Cube's two piano sonatas, praising them highly and making suggestions for
improvement.
-
OJ 89/3, [A] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, undated [between November 14, 1928 and
January 1, 1929]
Schenker asks Hoboken to send a copy of a Schubert minuet to Munich, and draws
his attention to a Landshoff article and notice about the Andreas Bach
book.
-
OJ 9/34, [31] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 8, 1932
Cube sends Schenker an Urlinie graph of Schubert's song "Der Dopplegänger," and offers an
extended commentary. Describes his work and state of mind, and comments on working with Moriz Violin; he
expresses fears for the Hamburg Schenker Institut. He has just got married.
-
OJ 12/6, [19] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated January 28, 1933
Jonas still has no response from Hoboken re: his Einführung; encloses four
essays; reports on forthcoming article, his teaching and advocacy of critical editions,
planned radio lectures and performance, and other work.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [23] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated December 19,
1940
In sending Christmas greetings, Violin tells Schoenberg that he heard his
Second Chamber Symphony [by radio] from New York. — He speaks of a course that he has been
hired to teach at the Jewish Center, and mentions a second possibility without divulging
details.
-
OJ 70/35, [9] Handwritten open letter from Schoenberg dated September 16, 1949, with handwritten
letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated October 14, 1949
Schoenberg sends a copy of his open letter on his 75th birthday, embedded
within a letter in which he expresses pleasure at Violin's report of his Carmel
performance.