-
OJ 9/6, [16] Handwritten calling card from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated January 28,
1897
Eugen d'Albert invites Schenker to Hotel Bristol at 5
o'clock.
-
OJ 6/3, [2] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked April 2,
1897
Schenker has a recommendation for his compositions from Goldmann via Busoni. He
is working on his Scherzo in C. Violin must visit Prof. Jerusalem.
-
OJ 6/3, [3] Handwritten calling card with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked May
22, 1897
Schenker reports that he is off [to Germany] and will see Violin on June
3.
-
OJ 6/3, [A] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [?1897 or 1899]
Schenker announces that he has completed a string quartet, and hopes to see
Violin shortly.
-
OJ 6/3, [B] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [?1897]
Schenker is unwell and advocates rest for both of them.
-
OJ 6/3, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 27, 1899
Ludwig Karpath wishes to take lessons -- theory with Schenker, piano with Violin
-- starting May 1.
-
OJ 6/3, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [?early July 1899]
Schenker tells Violin not to be troubled by their recent [unspecified] abortive
search: Weinberger is still on their side. He invites Violin to a Trischak [card]
party.
-
OJ 6/3, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [?late July 1899]
Schenker arranges with Violin to meet at the Weinberger headquarters, lunch, and
then for Violin to go on to meet Professor Jerusalem.
-
OJ 5/19, 8 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Kalbeck, dated September [recte November?]
6, 1899
Schenker asks to play his Syrische Tänze and Op. 10 to
Kalbeck.
-
OJ 12/7, 5 Handwritten postcard from Kalbeck to Schenker, postmarked November 15,
1899
Kalbeck moves Schenker's morning visit to the afternoon, and warns that
his piano is out of tune.
-
Sbb B II 4430 Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Busoni, dated January 7,
1900
Schenker has played his Syrische Tänze to Eduard Hanslick and reports the
favorable remarks Hanslick made about Busoni. The first public performance of the Dances has
been postponed because of illness.
-
OJ 6/3, [11] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked January 27,
1900
Schenker declares to Violin that they did not play badly [at the first
performance the previous evening of Schenker's Syrian Dances]. He invites Violin to play
Trischak the next day.
-
OJ 6/3, [12] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [c. February 1,
1900]
Schenker is about to write to Busoni. -- He is just off to the Leiners' house to
substitute for Violin [while the latter is in Berlin]. -- Eduard [Violin] is asking for a
handout.
-
OJ 6/3, [13] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 8,
1900
When Violin returns from Berlin, Schenker will send him his Zweistimmige
Inventionen, Op. 5: he inquires whether Busoni has said anything about them. -- He raises the
substitute lessons he is giving to the Wiener and Leiner families: Violin has failed to instruct
him on the fee to be charged. Can he ask 10 Florins? -- He disagrees with Mahler's performance
of the "Eroica."
-
OJ 6/3, [14] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 5, 1900
Moriz Schenker has tickets for a tour of the Brahms monument plinth and Heinrich
asks if anyone in Violin's family can use them.
-
OJ 6/3, [15] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked April 27,
1900
Schenker reprimands Violin for not writing to him from Berlin, and asks to see
him [now he is in Vienna]. -- He sends a message to Eduard Violin.
-
OJ 6/3, [16] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked August 22,
1900
Schenker writes from Lunz to describe the vacation accommodation available and to
give Moriz and Fanny Violin the alternatives for joining him and the Mayerhofer family.
-
OJ 6/3, [17] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked August 31,
1900
Schenker tells Violin he can come to Lunz to visit, but adds
caveats.
-
OJ 6/3, [18] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked September
13, 1900
Fanny Violin has informed Schenker that Moriz has been unwell. Schenker regrets
that he cannot renew his invitation to him to stay in the Lunz holiday household because there
is no longer space. He reports on Irene Mayerhofer's health. If the Mayerhofers leave earlier
than expected, he will let Violin know.
-
OJ 6/3, [19] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked November 1?,
1900
Schenker offers Violin advice on the planning of a concert and its financing,
promising to have his Hamlet incidental music ready in time. He reports on fees at the Leiners
and Wieners.
-
OJ 6/3, [20] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 11,
[1900]
Schenker again raises the question of fees for the Wiener and Leiner families,
and suggests a way that they can resolve the differences. He is pleased that a song by him, sung
by Eduard Gärtner, was well received.
-
OJ 14/45, [5] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, postmarked December 29, 1900
Violin sends Schenker New Year's greetings. -- He explains why he will be
remaining in Berlin until at least January 15, 1901. -- He apologizes over Mrs. Mayerhofer and
sends New Year's greetings to her.
-
OJ 70/35, [1] Handwritten postcard from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, undated, postmarked March 9,
1902
Schoenberg asks Violin to arrange the next day's reheasal.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [1] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated March 26, 1902
Violin has attended the successful premiere of Schoenberg's Verklärte Nacht,
and wishes to talk with him in person, apparently rather than sending a written report.
Violin speaks in strong terms of certain people, presumably in Wolzogen's Buntes Theater in
Berlin.
-
OJ 70/35, [2] Handwritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 10, 1902
Schoenberg rarely goes to the [Buntes] Theater. He insists on receiving a
report from Violin on a performance of his Verklärte Nacht.
-
OJ 6/4, [22] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Juli Genovefa Violin, dated February 15,
1903
Schenker sends condolences to Moriz Violin's mother on the death of her daughter,
Nina Violin.
-
OJ 6/4, [23] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked February 16,
1903
Schenker sends condolences to Violin on the death of his elder sister, Nina
Violin. — He reports on recent activities with Eduard Gärtner and card playing, on the current
Seligmann exhibition, and a recent experience at the Mayerhofer residence.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [2] Handwritten notecard with envelope from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated February
26, 1903
Violin is too unwell to meet Schoenberg and say "Adieu", and hopes for a
meeting on September 1.
-
OJ 6/4, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker and others to Moriz Violin, undated [?March
1903]
Schenker sympathizes with Moriz Violin for his dejection, reassures him that he
will become successful, and encourages him to return to Vienna; he tells him of new card games.
— Mrs Irene Mayerhofer and her daughter append brief messages.
-
OJ 6/4, [26] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [? March 1903]
Schenker sees prospects for himself, and believes likewise for Violin. He
supports Violin returning to Vienna.
-
OJ 6/4, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [summer 1903]
Schenker (apparently writing from Gmunden) tries to get Violin to influence
affairs at the Vienna Conservatory. — Schenker is sure the number of professors at the
Conservatory will increase, so considers his own [chance of procuring a professorship] to "have
improved." He is sure transfer to state control (Verstaatlichung) is bound to
happen.
-
OJ 6/4, [28] Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Violin, postmarked August 27,
1903
Having prepared his Mädchen Lieder for printing, Schenker, in Gmunden, is about
to work on his Trio. Busoni will be performing his Syrische Tänze in Berlin. He asks Violin to
check with Eduard Gärtner about financial support for Aron Mittelmann.
-
Sbb B II 3549 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Busoni, undated [c. September 1,
1903?]
Schenker explains that Arnold Schoenberg asked to orchestrate the piano duet
Syrian Dances years earlier, therefore that an orchestral version should be available. He
says, however, that he had from the beginning conceived the pieces in orchestral colors, but
that the orchestration would now take time, so he asks Busoni's preference. He reports that
other music societies have asked to perform works by him.
-
OJ 14/45, [6] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker[?], dated September 14,
1903
In a bleak and formal message, Violin declares that withdrawal of friendship by
the recipient of this letter would carry "great danger" for his (Violin's) way of life. He hopes
for a peaceable solution.
-
OJ 14/15, [3] Handwritten letter from Schoenberg to Schenker, undated [September 21,
1903?]
Schoenberg will visit Schenker the next day.
-
OJ 70/35, [3] Handwritten postcard from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated February 21,
1904
Since none of his [Op. 6?] songs is for female voice, Schoenberg decides not
to send them to Violin.
-
OJ 70/35, [4] Handwritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 5, 1904
Schoenberg asks for Violin's withdrawal from the Vereinigung schaffender
Tonkünstler in writing, and indicates that he cnnot understand it.
-
OJ 11/10, [6] Handwritten postcard from Frimmel to Schenker, postmarked November 10, 1904
Frimmel sends congratulations for Schenker's (and Violin's) great
success.
-
OJ 11/10, [7] Handwritten postcard from Frimmel to Schenker, dated March 14, 1905
The promised Handel Organ Concertos volume has not yet arrived. — Frimmel asks
for the score of the C. P. E. Bach concerto that Schenker played the previous fall. Tickets for
his Beethoven lectures will be sent soon.
-
OJ 11/10, [7a] Handwritten calling card from Frimmel to Schenker, undated [March 17 or 18,
1905]
Frimmel encloses ticket for his Beethoven lectures.
-
BNba Frimmel Nachl, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Frimmel, dated March 18, 1905
Schenker explains the delay in sending Frimmel the C. P. E. Bach concerto,
thanks Frimmel for the ticket to his lectures, and gives Violin's address.
-
OJ 11/10, [10] Handwritten letter from Frimmel to Schenker, dated March 21, 1905
Frimmel has had to postpone his lecture series on Beethoven until the Fall. —
He invites Schenker to afternoon tea at a date to be settled.
-
OJ 12/9, [1] Handwritten postcard from Karpath to Schenker, postmarked February 10, 1908
Karpath asks to speak with Schenker and Moriz Violin regarding a professorship
for Schenker.
-
OJ 14/23, [13] Handwritten letter from Seligmann to Schenker, undated [probably June
1908]
Seligmann cannot meet Schenker at the coffee-house that evening. He suggests
that Moriz Violin might join them on the excursion to Kreuzenstein Castle on
Sunday.
-
WSLB 14 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 19, 1908
Schenker gives list of those to receive a copy of Beitrag zur
Ornamentik.
-
WSLB 25 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 9, 1908
Schenker asks for copies of the Instrumentations-Tabelle to be sent to Violin
and Gärtner. — He has bought two copies of the Beitrag zur Ornamentik at the Gutmann music
store.
-
OC 52/28 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 11, 1908
Hertzka has had copies of the Instrumentations-Tabelle sent to Violin and
Gärtner. — He chides Schenker for buying copies at the Gutmann music store.
-
OJ 7/4, [50] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 26, 1909
Schenker has news to tell him regarding Richard Heuberger and Wilhelm Bopp;
reminds of forthcoming attendance at [a recital by] Artur Schnabel.
-
OJ 7/4, [51] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 10, 1909
Schenker must miss seeing an Ibsen play, because the latest batch of proofs of
Kontrapunkt I have to be finished.
-
OJ 7/4, [52] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 10, 1909
Schenker is in Steinach, awaiting Moriz Violin's arrival.
-
OJ 6/4, [46] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 22, 1909
Schenker reports a successful deal with Hertzka at Universal Edition, and refers
to monetary matters between them.
-
WSLB-Hds 94475 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, undated [probably early July
1909]
Schenker asks Seligmann to read an essay on Byron’s Manfred and, if he thinks
it worthy of publication, to send a letter of reference to one or other Viennese newspaper.
He also expresses his satisfaction at how his career is shaping: he has requested and
received generous fees for the editions he has prepared for Universal Edition, and his
theoretical writings for Cotta are also moving along.
-
WSLB-Hds 94476 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated July 17, 1909
Schenker thanks Seligmann for helping him to get a friend’s essay on Byron’s
Manfred published in a Viennese newspaper. He then asks whether it would be possible to make
a judgment about painters, and paintings, on purely objective grounds, as he (Schenker) has
been aiming to do with composers and musical works.
-
OJ 7/4, [53] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 26, 1909
Schenker leaves Steinach on Sunday [29th].
-
OJ 7/4, [54] Handwritten picture postcard from Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin, dated September 23,
1909
Jenny Kornfeld sends Moriz Violin best wishes for recovery, and greetings to
Fanny Violin; — her husband (Emil Kornfeld) adds his greetings.
-
WSLB 44 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated October 18, 1909
Schenker tells Hertzka of the Academy's plans to present a "historical"
concert of works edited by himself.
-
OJ 7/4, [55] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 5, 1909
Schenker on the delusion of progress; epigonism versus
progress-art.
-
OJ 6/4, [47] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 7, 1909
Schenker has Mittelmann coming, and hopes to complete proofs of Introduction to
the Instrumentationstabelle today and 9th.
-
OJ 6/4, [48] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 22, 1909
Schenker proposes program order for forthcoming concert.
-
OJ 7/4, [56] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 3, 1909
Schenker reports a conversation with "G." re conducting the "Kreuzstab"
Cantata.
-
WSLB-Hds 95656 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Seligmann, dated December 3, 1909
Schenker congratulates Seligmann on his latest feuilleton in the Neue Freie
Presse, and asks for clarification about a matter concerning an essay on Byron’s Manfred and
his friend Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 7/4, [57] Handwritten postcard from Schenker and others to Moriz Violin, dated December 13,
1909
Schenker and others ask if Violin can obtain free tickets for a Pugno
recital.
-
WSLB 53 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 15, 1910
Schenker advocates Moriz Violin's pamphlet "Über das sogenannte 'Continuo'"
for publication and explains its connection with a planned "historical
concert."
-
OJ 7/4, [60] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 14, 1910
Schenker will see Violin tomorrow. He has been "pumped" by Robert
Hirschfeld.
-
OJ 7/4, [61] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 23, 1910
Schenker suggests they return the due borrowed items to the Archive
together.
-
OJ 7/4, [62] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated April 8, 1910
Schenker gives Violin his opinion, and has a draft letter to show
him.
-
OJ 7/4, [63] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated June 3, 1910
Proofs of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue have arrived.
-
OJ 7/4, [64] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated July 4, 1910
Schenker has sent all materials to Cotta and is about to depart [for
Karerpass].
-
OJ 6/4, [49] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated [July] 9, 1910
Schenker announces his arrival in the Karerpass, speaks of the costs, and
outlines his concerns over money, including money he has to send to his mother on August 1. — He
will write a letter to a female patron. — He describes the magnificence of the mountain
views.
-
OJ 6/4, [50] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated July 22, 1910
Joking about some humorous rhyming verse of Violin's, Schenker reports that he
has sent off an important letter, and asks Violin to send him 12 swim-bladders. — He has defied
the cost of laundry in the Karerpass, being still worried about money. — He comments on Max
Graf's recent support of Schoenberg.
-
OJ 7/4, [66] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated August 2, 1910
Schenker awaits impatiently a letter from Violin; second proofs of the Chromatic
Fantasy are imminent.
-
OJ 7/4, [67] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated August 11, 1910
Schenker has had an ear blockage removed and can hear again.
-
OJ 6/4, [51] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated August 19, 1910
Schenker sends Violin 50 florins in partial repayment of a debt, expressing
anxieties about his financial situation. — No word yet from Cotta. — The effect of the hotel
fire on hotel businesses. — Emil Kornfeld arrives today.
-
OJ 7/4, [68] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated September 21, 1910
Schenker reports a proposition that Robert Hirschfeld has put to him, and
suggests lunch in Vienna.
-
OJ 6/4, [52] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 23, 1910
Schenker gives Violin his reactions to Wilhelm Bopp's cancelation of a planned
"historical" concert of music by C.P.E. and J.S. Bach and Handel at the Akademie, and urges that
they adhere to their original plan.
-
OJ 9/18, [1] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated October
13, 1910
Bopp is pleased that matters have been settled, and hopes to make Schenker's
acquaintance.
-
WSLB 66/67 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE) + list of names, dated October 19,
1910
Schenker cancels their Thursday meeting. — He argues for sweeping changes to
the draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. — He defends his own free speech in the
face of Universal Edition's commercial interests. As with his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition, UE will never regret publishing the Ninth Symphony monograph. — He also lauds the
prospective editions of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas and volume of J. S. Bach
toccatas in a lofty vision for future publications. — He appends a list of recipients of
complimentary copies of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue.
-
OJ 7/4, [69] Handwritten postcard from Jenny Kornfeld and Heinrich Schenker to Violin, dated
December 9, 1910
Jenny Kornfeld asks to speak with Moriz Violin re her divorce petition. Heinrich
gives his availability and reports on his mother's situation.
-
OJ 9/18, [2] Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Bopp (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated January
14, 1911
Bopp regrets that he was unable to attend Schenker's chamber music
concert.
-
OC 52/62 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Moriz Violin, dated January 19,
1911
Hertzka regrets having missed Moriz Violin's concert, and asks for a
list of recipients for his booklet Ueber das Continuo.
-
OJ 8/1, [2] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated April 15, 1911
A jokey message giving the menu of a meal eaten in Pressbaum.
-
OJ 8/1, [3] Handwritten picture postcard from Jenny Kornfeld and Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin,
dated June 11, 1911
Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld report the delights of the Vienna
Woods.
-
OJ 8/1, [4] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 1,
1911
Schenker reports on Jeanette's and his journey to Sulden.
-
OJ 8/1, [5] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated July 10, 1911
Schenker asks why Violin is silent about visiting them.
-
OJ 8/1, [7] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 4,
1911
Schenker inquires after Violin's location and company; — reports his work on
Riemann's theories.
-
OJ 6/5, [1] Handwritten double letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated August 18, 1911
Heinrich and Jenny Kornfeld are in the Sulden Valley, Tyrol. Heinrich writes
about his planned refutation of the theories of Hugo Riemann and the need to establish his own
theories in Germany; — and about separate accommodation arrangements for Jenny. Jenny writes
more somberly about the coming autumn and its difficulties.
-
OJ 6/5, [2] Handwritten double letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated August 26, 1911
With Heinrich and Jenny Kornfeld still in Sulden (Tyrol), Heinrich alludes to
the uncertainty about their return on account of a recent storm and destruction to the road;
— they have decided that, on return to Vienna, Jenny shall stay in a hotel until an
apartment is found for her; — Violin is asked to mail a letter to Schenker's attorney which
concerns Jenny's maintenance payments; Jenny reports that she is unrecognized in
Sulden.
-
OJ 8/1, [9] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin, dated
September 8, 1911
Schenker asks if a letter has arrived at Violin's address, and asks for it to be
forwarded to him if so.
-
OJ 8/1, [10] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 11,
1911
Schenker complains that Violin has failed to turn up for an agreed meeting at the
right place. He comments favorably on a new composition by Violin. He is going to the Pollaks in
the evening.
-
OJ 6/5, [3] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin, dated
September 26, 1911
Seemingly in response to a cry for companionship, Heinrich and Jenny Kornfeld express
their willingness to help, and ask what would be best.
-
OJ 6/5, [4] Handwritten letter from Jenny Kornfeld and Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 5,
1911
Jenny Kornfeld gives Violin an account of the verdict of October 3, 1911 on her divorce
plea.
-
OJ 8/1, [11] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 9,
1911
In promising to visit Violin, Schenker gives details of the lessons he has to
give over three days; — reports pending visit by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 8/1, [12] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 10,
1911
Citing Hebbel, and referring to the mystery "Frau O.," Schenker speaks of
Violin's unreliability, and also of Jenny Kornfeld's financial
difficulties.
-
OJ 8/1, [13] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 29,
1911
Schenker has booked four seats for the theater [for Wedekind:
Erdgeist].
-
OJ 8/1, [14] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 3,
1911
Schenker complains of Violin's dilatoriness, and asks to meet
him..
-
OJ 8/1, [15] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin, dated
November 5, 1911
Schenker reports a difficult encounter with "Frau O."; also reports a first
victory in Jenny Kornfeld's divorce application.
-
OJ 8/1, [16] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 7,
1911
Schenker urges Violin to request Hertzka send a copy of his Continuo
essay.
-
OJ 8/1, [17] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin, dated
November 27, 1911
Schenker reports the impossibility of Jenny Kornfeld's defending herself in her
divorce plea; and Jenny writes that she has had to send an inventory of all her chattels to Emil
Kornfeld.
-
OJ 12/9, [5] Handwritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated March 3, 1912
Karpath expresses approval of Schenker's Kontrapunkt I and Moriz Violin's book on
the continuo. —He thinks highly of Violin and of Hans Weisse as a composer.
-
WSLB-Hds 94477 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Seligmann, dated May 22, 1912
Schenker congratulates Seligmann on the recent exhibition of his paintings. He
is about to send him a copy of his Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony and asks him to read the
section on the secondary literature and consider whether the same might be applied to the
literature on painting.
-
WSLB 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), date June 4, 1912
Schenker urges Hertzka to contact Dr. Harpner in connection with the planned
Organization. He reiterates his demands regarding payment for the planned last five
Beethoven sonata edition, specifying the sums, and disputes Hertzka's
counterargument.
-
WSLB 119 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 5, 1912
Schenker inquires about the print-run and retail cost of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and points out an inconsistency in the edition number. He asks for
clarity on a payment he has just received, stressing his probity.
-
WSLB 123 Handwritter letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 24, 1912
Schenker reports improved agreement among the supporters of the planned
Organization. -- He asks for his contract for his edition of Op. 109, and asks yet again for
the fee for correcting proofs of Beethovens neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 128 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated July 21, 1912
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie: Schenker justifies the higher number of proof
corrections and reiterates his demand for a supplementary honorarium. -- Die letzten fünf
Sonaten: he objects to a clause in the draft contract concerning correction costs, and
emphasizes the expenses that he himself is incurring in preparing the
edition.
-
OJ 15/15,[I] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, [1912]
Weisse reports of progress with his string quintet; expresses his delight at
Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, and speaks of "a bridge between art and
theory"; and expresses misgivings about Moriz Violin's pamphlet on the Vienna Academy. He
appeals to Schenker to give him piano lessons, and reports other matters.
-
OJ 15/16, [8] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 10, 1912
Weisse speaks of Schenker's monograph on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony and progress
with his own string quintet; — reiterates his desire to transfer from Violin to Schenker for
piano lessons; — refers to lectures that he is about to take with Guido Adler, and quotes from
Florence May's biography of Brahms. — He will write to Lorle Meissner; — gives his address in
Pontresina.
-
OJ 15/6, [11] Handwritten letter from Fritz Wahle to Schenker, dated August 10, 1912
Fritz Wahle explains how he came to acquire Schenker’s book on Beethoven’s
Ninth Symphony. He has read Moriz Violin’s pamphlet about the leadership of the Vienna
Academy and hopes that some good will come of it. In response to a letter from Schenker, he
expresses his agreement with what Schenker has to say about Wagner, and again praises his
friend for the serious intent of his writings.
-
OC 1 B/15 Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Carl Colbert, dated September 15,
1912
Schenker explains why he deprecates strongly giving a student only one lesson a
week and positively recommends two or three; he leaves the matter to Colbert, but gives him a
difficult choice.
-
OJ 9/30, [3] Handwritten letter from Tony Colbert to Schenker, undated [September 16,
1912]
Mrs. Colbert begs to be accepted back as a pupil on one lesson a week. She has
asked Sofie Deutsch whether she would give over one of her two lessons to her and Mrs. Deutsch
has declined; she now asks whether Mrs. Stirling might agree to do the same.
-
WSLB 137 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 24,
1912
Schenker reports developments on the Organization front and also the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde's "Hochschule" front.
-
OJ 15/6, [12] Handwritten notecard from Fritz Wahle to Schenker, dated September 25,
1912
Fritz Wahle thanks Schenker for his book on Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony and
expresses his agreement about the concept of program music. He hopes that the two of them
could get together for a few hours, and sends his greetings to their mutual friend Moriz
Violin.
-
OJ 15/16, [11] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 6, 1912
Weisse has heard nothing from Moriz Violin and is anxious to transfer to Schenker
for piano lessons.
-
OJ 13/29, [8] Handwritten letter from Rosenthal to Schenker, dated November 10, 1912
Rosenthal apologizes for mishandling of ticket issue, and raises the matter of
forming an artists' organization.
-
OJ 15/16, [16] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 9, 1913
Weisse reports receipt of a letter from Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 15/16, [20] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 13, 1913
Weisse reports a conversation with Franz Steiner about Richard Strauss and his
alleged interest in Schenker's work. — Weisse looks forward to having three lessons a week with
Schenker.
-
OJ 12/9, [8] Handwritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated October 9, 1913
Karpath had asked Schenker for support for Mittelmann and complains at Schenker's
rude reaction.
-
OJ 6/5, [29] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated November 28,
1913
Heinrich and Jeanette have regarded it as their duty to invite Fanny Violin on
each occasion that they invited Moriz and Valerie; their conduct is thus blameless; only now
have they understood Fanny's true meaning in writing as she did after two years. They wish to
place no pressure on her and to help her overcome her illness.
-
OJ 12/26, [2] Typewritten letter from the Rothschild Artists' Foundation to Schenker, dated
December 3, 1916
The Rothschild Artists' Foundation invites Schenker to serve on a panel of
jurors with Guido Adler and Alfred Grünfeld.
-
OJ 8/3, [49] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 7, 1917
Heinrich and Jeanette are unable to visit. Remarks on parliaments of the
regions.
-
OJ 8/3, [50] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated November 16,
1917
Schenker requests Moriz's full army address; pressure of work precludes a visit;
a parcel has gone astray.
-
OJ 8/3, [51] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 23, 1917
Schenker thinks the worst is over [in World War I]; accepts promised
jam.
-
OJ 6/6, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated December 30, 1917
In response to the Violins' condolences on the death of his mother, Schenker
reflects sadly on her life and needs between 1890 and the late 1910s, attributing blame largely
to his younger brother Moriz, less to his older brother Wilhelm; — He explains why he and
Jeanette are unable to visit the Violins in the cold and without adequate
clothing.
-
OJ 8/3, [56] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 31, 1918
Schenker inquires as to the price of a jar of jam that Valerie Violin brought him
and lays down a "no presents" rule; reports Halm's difficulties in obtaining copies of
Schenker's works from UE.
-
OJ 14/45, [10] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 5,
1918
Schenker, Violin alleges, has accused him of a dearth of subject matter in letter
writing; Violin defends himself on grounds that his life has been disrupted by military service
and the impact of that on his physical and mental state. He accuses Schenker of insensitivity,
and treating him like his pupils. He defends his wife for giving food to the Schenkers, and
explains her motivation for so doing.
-
OJ 6/6, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 17, 1918
Schenker warns Violin to expect a letter from Vrieslander concerning a
contribution to a Festschrift for Schenker's 50th birthday, and then airs a number of grievances
against Moriz and Valerie concerning jars of jam, Sunday visits, and insufficient food.
-
OJ 6/6, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 20, 1918
[50th Festschrift:] Schenker intends not to influence anyone in their decision to
contribute or not. — [Personal issues:] Schenker agrees to draw a line under issues discussed in
OJ 6/6, [6]; however, he accounts for his epistolary silence regarding Valerie Violin, including
the possible contact with Seligmann; he attempts to explain the matter of the jars of jam and
the absence of visits to Schönbrunn, describing vividly how tirelessly Jeanette works and how
dependent they both are on Sunday for work time; he expresses outrage that he and Jeanette live
so poorly while his pupils live lives of luxury, commenting bitterly on state of play over the
Sofie Deutsch stipend; he wishes the Violins well for their 6-month stay in Marburg.
-
OJ 8/3, [57] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 7, 1918
Schenker has implemented the increase in fee, for his pupils, and describes how
intolerable life is in Vienna; -- is trying with dificulty to book summer lodgings; -- reports
Weisse's declining of the invitation to contribute to the Schenker Festschrift; -- he is working
hard on his library.
-
OJ 8/3, [58] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 13, 1918
Schenker reports on Kufferath's article in the Gazette de Lausanne discussing the
polemical materials in Die letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 111, and on the treasonous stance of the
Arbeiterzeitung.
-
OJ 8/3, [59] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jeanette Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated May 13, 1918
Schenker thanks Moriz Violin for an address; reports on planned visit to his
brother Wilhelm Schenker, and food promised by him and items sent by Felix Hupka; Heinrich and
Jeanette expect to spend the summer in Vienna.
-
OJ 8/3, [60] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 28, 1918
Comments on the death of Fritz Wahle and the illness of Eduard Gärtner; is trying
to negotiate the summer in the Tyrol, but may not succeed; congratulates Violin.
-
OJ 8/3, [61] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 21, 1918
The Schenkers went to Mariazell on the 16th for a work-free vacation. - -
Schenker has had difficulties with Wilhelm and Moriz Schenker. - - He describes visit to Hupka
in Kapuvár (Hungary). - - Comments on Violin's forthcoming promotion to Lieutenant.
-
OJ 6/6, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 9, 1918
Schenker reports news from Russia, Austria, Switzerland, and Poland, and comments
on the current political situation.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [2a] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 13,
1919
Violin urgently asks to meet.
-
OJ 8/3, [65] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 17,
1919
Rhyming joke
-
OJ 8/3, [66] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 13,
1919
Discusses Violin's prospects of returning to the Vienna Conservatory now that its
president is leaving.
-
OJ 12/9, [25] Handwritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated March 27, 1919
Mittelmann refused Schenker's 100 Kronen. Karpath has terminated Mittelmann's
working relationship with him.
-
OJ 8/3, [67] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 24,
1919
Notification of the restaurant at which the Schenkers now eat; Paul de Conne is
hoping to return to the Vienna Conservatory, too.
-
OJ 6/6, [9] Handwritten triple-letter from Jeanette Kornfeld and Heinrich Schenker to Valerie and
Moriz Violin, dated July 15, 1919
(1) Jeanette to Valerie: offers sympathy and reassurance about her illness;
describes the Tantalier Castle and its romantic associations; (2) Heinrich to Valerie:
recommends eating large quantities; (3) Heinrich to Moriz: supports food theory by reference to
his own proneness to nervous depression; suggests that Valerie recuperate in Zell am
See.
-
OJ 8/3, [68] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 2,
1919
Schenker inquires again after Moriz, Valerie, and the latter's health. He is
expecting visits from Dahms and Weisse.
-
OJ 6/6, [10] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 17,
1919
Schenker hopes that colleagues will support Moriz Violin. – The court has favored
Emil Kornfeld unduly. – A move to Germany might save Schenker money, but he is uncertain how
many of his pupils would follow him there (only Pairamall has indicated willingness). – He asks
Weisse to act as an intermediary in booking a supply of wood for burning. – Dahms and Weisse are
due for simultanous visits. – He is glad to hear Valerie Violin is better.
-
OJ 8/3, [69] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 31,
1919
Heinrich and Jeanette have official permission to remain at Schloß Tantalier
until September 15. -- They have been exhausted by the visits of Weisse and Dahms. -- Weisse
[meanness] contrasts instructively with Dahms [generosity].
-
OJ 8/3, [70] Handwritten double-postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jeanette Kornfeld (Schenker) to
Moriz and Valerie Violin, dated September 25, 1919
(1) Heinrich to Moriz: draws Moriz Violin's attention to an article in Der
Merker; (2) Jeanette to Valerie: needs to buy a suit, and asks advice as to
where.
-
OJ 8/3, [71] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 19,
1919
Banns of marriage have been posted; looking forward to visiting.
-
OJ 8/3, [72] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 2,
1919
The [wedding] date will be fixed next Wednesday; the engravings on the two rings.
– They are due at Furtwängler's concert, but cannot commit to any other times.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, dated November 5, 1919
Having attended for the first time a concert conducted by Furtwängler, Schenker
congratulates him on his achievement then, proclaiming him a "counterweight" to the present [in
his opinion inadequate] generation of conductors, and heir to the Mahler mantle. Schenker
comments on Viennese concert-goers and their fickleness. — He commends Moriz Violin to
Furtwängler, in case the latter can provide an introduction to Hausegger.
-
OJ 11/16, [1] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November [18 or 19,]
1919
Furtwängler prizes Schenker's approval higher than that of others; he is
uncertain what role he is destined to play in the musical life of Vienna; he hopes to talk with
Schenker.
-
OJ 8/3, [73] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, December 15,
1919
Schenker reports on his meeting with Emil Hertzka and the latter's offers on Die
letzten fünf Sonaten ... op. 101 and the Kleine Bibliothek, about which Schenker wishes to talk
with Violin.
-
OJ 8/3, [74] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 30,
1919
One postcard and one letter to Violin have come back undelivered; indignation at
post office's incompetence.
-
OJ 8/3, [80] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 12, 1920
Schenker comments acerbically on the settlement with Emil Kornfeld. — Reports on
a contract Halm has shown him. — Inquires about the children's health and reports that Wilhelm
has been taken ill.
-
OJ 8/3, [81] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 31, 1920
Schenker asks Violin to inquire about availability of the apartment of one of the
Rosé String Quartet members.
-
OJ 8/3, [82] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 13, 1920
Amount of divorce settlement and its investment. — Op. 101/3 sketches arrived.
-
OJ 8/3, [83] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 8, 1920
Tonschl's report on conversation with Moriz Schenker, and advice.
-
OJ 8/3, [84] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 16, 1920
Moriz Schenker extends invitation to meet, confirms sum of 68,080 Kronen. —
Meeting with Hertzka scheduled for next day.
-
OJ 8/3, [85] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 12, 1920
Schenker inquires about Furtwängler, and reports progress with Hertzka.
-
OJ 8/3, [86] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 5, 1920
Schenker writes scathingly about his brother Moriz's attitude to Schenker's
problems.
-
OJ 8/3, [87] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 14,
1920
The Schenkers like Seefeld and are busy with proofs, etc. — Will Violin visit
them?
-
OJ 8/3, [88] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich & Jeanette Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July
30, 1920
Schenker reports that the attempt to procure an apartment in Reisnerstraße 17 has
failed, and complains about the corrupt circumstances.
-
OJ 8/3, [89] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 23, 1920
Gives date of return to Vienna, and confirms Tuesday meeting.
-
OJ 8/3, [91] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October
16, 1920
Schenker is curious how Violin gets on with Ferdinand Pfohl. — Is Violin seeking
a teaching position in Hamburg? — Reports on delivery of Kontrapunkt 2 to Cotta. — Will visit
Wally next Sunday.
-
OJ 8/3, [90] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker to Valerie Violin, undated,
postmarked [October] 17, 1920
The Schenkers are unable to visit Wally this Sunday, but will do so the following
Sunday.
-
OJ 8/4, [1] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 10, 1921
Schenker asks Violin to arrange for payments and currency
conversion.
-
OJ 8/4, [2] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 6, 1921
Schenker congratulates Violin on obtaining a teaching post in Hamburg and reports
on progress on his written work and publications.
-
OJ 8/4, [3] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated February 8, 1921
Schenker accepts an invitation to lunch from Valerie Violin.
-
OJ 8/4, [4] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated
February 26, 1921
Schenker inquires about a series of payments from Miss Reich for
lessons.
-
OJ 8/4, [5] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 29, 1921
Schenker describes some of the last-minute activities prior to their moving to a
new apartment, at No. 8 Keilgasse, lists his works that are about to be published, and reports
that Buxbaum has been dismissed as cellist of the Arnold Rosé Quartet.
-
OJ 6/7, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 13, 1921
Schenker gives an account of the move into Keilgasse 8 and describes his study in
the apartment. He outlines his holiday plans, and explains how he is raising the fees for
lessons in the autumn.
-
OJ 8/4, [7] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 6, 1921
In anticipation of preparing an edition of Handel's keyboard works, Schenker asks
Violin for the address of a library in Hamburg that would be likely to have an early print or
handwritten copy of Handel's first book of Suites.
-
OC 24/4-5 Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated August 3, 1921
Violin expresses his awe concerning the first issue of Der Tonwille, and declares
himself ready to offer his services in making Schenker's work better understood.
-
OJ 14/45, [11] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 1, 1921
Violin announces the formation of a piano trio ensemble with a violinist named
Wolfsthal and the cellist Friedrich Buxbaum, inquires about the proposed edition of Handel's
keyboard works, and reports on the incipient civil unrest in the wake of a national movement in
Germany.
-
OJ 8/4, [8] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 23, 1921
Schenker alerts Violin to the imminent arrival of a payment.
-
OJ 14/45, [105] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated October 6, 1921
Violin acknowledges receipt of payment, inquires about reviews of Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 14/45, [12] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 30, 1921
Violin reports on his work, and on musicians in Hamburg, and congratulates
Schenker on his (publication) successes.
-
OJ 15/15, [11] Handwritten postcard from Hertha and Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated December 1,
1921
Weisse has returned a score to Universal Edition and written to Moriz Violin. He
has, with some reluctance, raised his lesson fee.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OJ 14/45, [13] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 2, 1922
In this direct reply to Schenker's previous letter, OJ 6/7, [2], Violin expresses
his dismay that some of the performing material for keyboard concertos by C. P. E. Bach,
including original cadenzas by Schenker, appear to have gone missing. — He reports on his
growing number of pupils, on the acquisition of a piano for his apartment, and on Hamburg's
extremely conservative musical tastes.
-
OJ 8/4, [11] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 9, 1922
Schenker apologizes for not having been in touch with Violin, mainly owing to
overwork and a severe diabetic reaction, which required medical attention. He reports on a new
series of Beethoven sonata editions – an "Urlinie-Ausgabe" – he is planning to
undertake.
-
OJ 6/7, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 6, 1922
This wide-ranging letter describes the difficulties encountered with Emil Hertzka
at Universal Edition, concerning an attack on the music critic Paul Bekker planned for the
"Miscellanea" of Tonwille 2. — He expresses his displeasure with Weisse for putting his success
as a composer in the way of aiding his teacher's cause, and for exploiting his teacher's
generosity. — Ends with generous praise for Violin's musicianship.
-
OJ 8/4, [12] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [June 17, 1922]
Schenker explains why the "Miscellanea" is missing from Tonwille 2; he likens
Hertzka's heavy-handedness to Prince Metternich's police-state tactics.
-
OJ 8/4, [13] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9, 1922
Schenker reports the publication of the second part of Kontrapunkt and continued
difficulties with Universal Edition.
-
OJ 14/45, [14] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 24, 1922
In this highly emotional letter, Violin describes his personal difficulties in
the face of spiraling inflation in Germany.
-
OJ 8/4, [14] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 5, 1922
Schenker commends Walter Dahm's latest book, Die Offenbarung der Musik, to Violin
as one which ought to have important consequences for the course of music.
-
OJ 14/45, [15] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 3, 1922
Violin reports that his son Karl has suffered several setbacks of health,
including inflammation of a cardiac muscle. Plans for Musikhochschule in Hamburg are making
strides.
-
OJ 8/4, [15] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 10, 1922
Hearing of the Violins' son Karl's recent illness, Schenker sends his sympathy,
then reports on his financial troubles. His application for a post at the University of Leipzig
was received without enthusiasm, on the grounds that he is "more an artist than a
scholar."
-
OJ 14/45, [16] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Violin reports briefly about his son's health, then goes into the practical
issues arising from Schenker's active search for a post at a German music institute.
-
OJ 14/45, [17] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Apparently having returned from a visit to Vienna, Violin expresses his joy at
having seen Schenker recently.
-
OJ 8/4, [16] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 29, 1922
Schenker reports, among other things, that Hans Weisse has returned as a paying
pupil.
-
OJ 14/45, [106] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 19, 1922
Violin points out that Universal Edition is advertising Schoenberg's
Harmonielehre but not Schenker's.
-
OJ 6/7, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 21, 1922
Schenker reports the imminent publication of Tonwille 3, and some new publishing
ventures, including a (new) edition of music by C. P. E. Bach and an "Urlinie Edition" of the
Short Preludes by J. S. Bach.
-
OJ 8/4, [17] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 23, 1922
Amplifying a thought expressed in a recent letter, Schenker speaks of a plan to
silence the throng that worships Schoenberg and the moderns, but money for it is
lacking.
-
OJ 8/4, [20] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 21,
1923
Schenker reports on the publication progress of Der Tonwille, and on his plans to
get his pupils to help him distribute copies to schools and potentially interested readers.
-
OJ 14/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 6, 1923
Violin thanks Schenker for Tonwille 3 and reports on growing social unrest and
anti-French feeling in Germany.
-
OJ 8/4, [21] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 5,
1923
Schenker asks after Violin and his family, reports on progress with Der Tonwille
and the edition of the Beethoven sonatas.
-
OJ 8/4, [22] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 26,
1923
Not having heard from him for a long time, Schenker’s asks for news of Violin and
his family.
-
OJ 14/45, [21] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated April 28, 1923
Violin reports on a brief trip to Berlin for respite from the strain of teaching
and his son’s illness. He is reading the second volume of Schenker’s Counterpoint, but asks him
for clarification of a matter concerning second-species counterpoint in two voices, discussed in
volume 1.
-
OJ 14/45, [22] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated May 31, 1923
Apparently replying to a letter from Schenker (not recorded in his diary), Violin
describes the widespread self-disparagement among Germans, and blames Jewish intellectuals for
the defeatist atmosphere in Germany.
-
OJ 8/4, [23] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 11,
1923
Responding to a letter from Violin despairing of the political situation in
Germany, Schenker quotes a passage from Pastor Gustav Frenssen's Letters from America, which
resonate with his own views that German society is, in effect, ruled by foreign despots.
-
OJ 6/7, [5] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9,
1923
Having settled into country life in the Tyrol, Schenker returns to his work, in
particular to the ongoing battles with Hertzka over the publication of Der Tonwille. He asks
Violin’s opinion about a subscription plan for a periodical that would appear four times a year
(instead of the current two), and hopes that his friend might spare a few days to visit him in
Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [23] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 12, 1923
Violin writes approvingly of Schenker’s scheme to make Der Tonwille available by
subscription, as a periodical publication, and has a plan in mind. He inquires about the cost of
staying in Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 14, 1923
Violin has met an industrialist by the name of Max Temming who would be willing
to help make Schenker’s work more widely accessible. Violin will probably not visit the
Schenkers in Galtür this summer, as prices have gone up in Germany.
-
OJ 15/16, [48] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated July 15, 1923
Weisse summarizes his recent travels in northern Italy and Switzerland, and
inquires about progress on Der freie Satz, a work which he thinks will be an indispensable
foundation for the analyses in Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OJ 8/4, [24] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 9,
[1923]
Concerned that Violin has not arrived in Galtür, Schenker asks him if something
has gone amiss with his plans to visit.
-
OJ 14/45, [25] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated August 16, 1923
Violin cannot come to the Tyrol to visit the Schenkers, on account of the
turmoil in Germany and horrendous currency situation; he will come to Vienna for Christmas, but
only for a few days.
-
OJ 8/4, [25] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 3,
1923
Schenker asks for a few lines from Violin, just to let him know that things are
all right, so that he can send him a longer message.
-
OJ 14/45, [26] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated October 9, 1923
In response to Schenker’s recent postcard, Violin reports that his family are
mainly well, but that the political situation in Germany is so depressing that it is almost
impossible to write. He would be glad to have some news from Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [7] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 21,
1923
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker expresses his joy at Karl Violin’s improving
health, and goes on to mention a number of personal successes he has lately had, including a
visit from Paul von Klenau to take advice for a forthcoming performance of Beethoven’s Missa
solemnis. He has also had some unexpected support from his publisher, who wants to expand Der
Tonwille to a quarterly publication. He is planning to take part in a series of charity concerts
(three Haydn piano trios), and has heard that Clemens Kraus and Hans Knappertsbusch are
overtaking Furtwängler as conductors in Vienna by accepting more modest fees.
-
OJ 14/45, [27] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated December 11, 1923
Violin reports the conversion to a new, stable currency in Germany; Hamburg has
been among the first cities to benefit from this, as a result of which he is somewhat better off
and the prospects for the future appear brighter. He plans to come to Vienna for Christmas, if
only for a few days; this will give him an opportunity to discuss arrangements for the
distribution of copies of Der Tonwille to libraries and schools.
-
OJ 14/45, [30] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 5, 1924
Violin reports that Max Temming is keen to support his plan to promote Schenker's
work. Following discussions with Schenker in Vienna, he makes some provisional calculations on
how the gift of money would give Schenker more time to devote to his writings. He also thinks
about the happy prospect of Schenker coming to Hamburg.
-
OJ 6/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14, 1924
Schenker reports continuing trouble with Hertzka, especially over delays to the
publication of Tonwille 5 and 6, which were supposed to appear the previous year, and is
beginning to think about legal action. Hertzka has made his position so difficult that he feels
obliged to turn down Max Temming's offer of direct financial support for his work. He asks
Violin to help find a post in Hamburg for Carl Bamberger, a gifted pupil who, though he
neglected his piano studies for a while, is keen to make up for lost time. Finally, he asks if
Violin received any of the four volumes of the Beethoven piano sonata edition.
-
OJ 14/45, [31] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 16, 1924
Violin acknowledges receipt of Tonwille 5 and the Beethoven sonata edition. In
the former, he finds the graphs of the short preludes by Bach more difficult than anything that
Schenker has previously done. He will write to Bamberger with the offer of help (in finding an
accompanist post in Hamburg). In response to a question on the "Appassionata" Sonata from one of
his pupils, he offers an explanation for the falling direction of the transitional theme
(measures 24-30) and its reappearance in the development section (measures 94-100) in inverted,
ascending form; he asks if this interpretation is sensible.
-
OJ 8/4, [28] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [March 30, 1924]
Schenker confirms Violin's interpretation [given in his previous letter] of the
"Appassionata" Sonata, and describes continued difficulties with Hertzka. Herman Roth has
written to say that he and his son are using Schenker's analyses of Bach preludes in their
counterpoint classes, and expresses the hope that one day they will continue Schenker's work
independently.
-
OJ 8/4, [29] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated [April 11, 1924]
Schenker offers Violin advice about holidaying in Austria, recommending the Tyrol
above all. He expects that Otto Vrieslander and possibly Herman Roth will visit them [in
Galtür]. He also inquires about the establishment of a Hochschule for music in Hamburg.
-
OJ 14/46, [2] Handwritten letter from Fanny Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated June 18, 1924
Fanny thanks Schenker for sending Tonwille 5 and 6 and reports holiday plans.
-
OJ 14/45, [32] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 24, 1924
Writing from the nearby town of Schruns, in the Montafun Valley (Vorarlberg),
Violin asks Schenker to suggest a day when he and his wife might visit them in Galtür.
-
OJ 8/4, [30] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 28, 1924
Writing from Galtür to Schruns in the nearby Motafon Valley, Schenker invites the
Violins to visit them some time during their Austrian holiday, and shows them, on the picture,
the mountain pass where they can meet up.
-
OJ 8/4, [32] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 5, 1924
Schenker sends a greeting on the occasion of the Violins' return to Hamburg after
their holiday in Austria, writing a picture postcard showing the cottage where they presumably
went for a meal.
-
OJ 8/4, [31] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker and others to Moriz
Violin, undated [postmarked August 12, 1924]
In this postcard, begun by Heinrich Schenker, continued by Jeanette Schenker and
Carl Bamberger, and additionally signed by Anthony and Annemarie van Hoboken and Otto
Vrieslander, all express their regret that the Violins could not be with them.
-
OJ 14/45, [107] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated August 14, 1924
Violin thanks Schenker for his recent postcard, and reports that he will resume
negotiations with Max Temming concerning the distribution of copies of Der Tonwille when the
latter return to Hamburg.
-
OJ 14/45, [33] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated August 29, 1924
Violin reports on continued negotiations with Max Temming on the distribution of
free copies of Der Tonwille, and gives a brief description of the Hamburger Fremdenblatt (in
which something about Schenker's writings may have recently appeared). He expresses his
embarrassment regarding the essay he had written at the behest of Otto Vrieslander on the
occasion of Schenker's 50th birthday, but agrees to let him see it.
-
OJ 14/45, [34] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 8, 1924
Violin has secured the agreement of Max Temming to subsidize 100 subscriptions to
Der Tonwille, and asks for a list of names and addresses for the recipients. With money growing
scarce, he has raised his fees, as a result of which several have left; but he has also gained
some new ones.
-
OJ 14/45, [35] Handwritten draft letter to Max Temming, in Schenker’s hand, dated October 10, 1924,
sent to Moriz Violin
In this draft letter to Max Temming, Schenker expresses his thanks for the
industrialist's financial support for the dissemination of Der Tonwille to university music
departments.
-
OJ 6/7, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 16, 1924
After thanking Violin for his touching fiftieth-birthday tribute of 1918,
Schenker outlines plans for sending out copies of Der Tonwille: he has drawn up a list, which
Violin is free to edit. Like Violin, he has lost pupils recently, and so wants to concentrate
more on the dissemination of Der Tonwille, with a new publisher.
-
OJ 14/45, [36] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 22, 1924
In the process of arranging for copies of Der Tonwille to be distributed, Violin
discovers that a pupil of his paid twice as much for one issue as the marked price in Austria.
He has made some inquiries into this matter, and asks Schenker what an issue currently costs in
Austria. There are no respectable music institutions in Hamburg, so Violin will distribute
copies there personally.
-
OJ 14/45, [37] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated November 23, 1924
Violin sends thanks to Jeanette for copying out the article he wrote in 1918. He
has sent off ten letters [re distribution of copies of Der Tonwille] and placed the order with
UE. He reports on Buxbaum and Pollak, and also Blüthner.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 6/7, [11] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 6, 1924
Schenker has received a photographic reproduction of the opening chorus of Bach's
St Matthew Passion. — Gives account of delays to the publication of Tonwille 8/9 and 10, blaming
Hertzka for being slow to send work to the engraver, and has written to him with a request to
dissolve the Tonwille contract with UE. — Refers to a recent review by (Julius) Korngold, and
recounts a long story about his piano dealer, Bernhard Kohn.
-
OJ 6/7, [12] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 8, 1924
Hearing that Violin is unwell, Schenker wishes his friend a speedy recovery. —
Encloses a draft of a letter to the university music departments chosen to be given copies of
Der Tonwille. — Recounts a story according to which Eusebius Mandyczewski prevented distribution
of complimentary copies of Der Tonwille to needy scholars.
-
OJ 6/7, [13] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 13, 1924
Schenker sends Violin Jeanette's handwritten copy of the essay Violin had
composed for Schenker's fiftieth birthday in 1918, and hopes that it may one day be published. —
Has received a conciliatory letter from Hertzka, but is determined to move Der Tonwille to a
Munich publisher.
-
OJ 14/45, [39] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 10, 1924
This somewhat cryptic letter, possibly relating to a subscription order for Der
Tonwille, was sent with an enclosure that required some interpretation or action on the part of
Schenker. Violin also reports that the music department at the University of Berlin has
received, with gratitude, the copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 14/45, [41] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 19, 1925
Violin reports on a successful concert in which he performed both as a soloist
and with the Klingler String Quartet. He thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10. He has received a copy
of Hans Weisse’s recent vocal quartets, and is puzzled by how a limited talent can write such
good music. He is going to see Max Temming, and has received four courteous letters of
acknowledgement from university music departments for copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 24, 1925
Responding point by point to Violin's previously letter (OJ 14/45, [41]),
Schenker congratulates his friend on the success of his recent concert. He writes at length
about Hertzka's last efforts to hold onto Der Tonwille, and about successful negotiations with
Drei Masken Verlag over its successor, Das Meisterwerk in der Musik. He has now to prepare
enough material for a yearbook comprising fifteen gatherings by July 1, so that the volume can
be published by Christmas. Finally, he echoes Violin's assessment of Hans Weisse, adding a few
disparaging remarks about his character.
-
OJ 14/45, [42] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 30, 1925
Violin lends Schenker the letters sent by university music departments
acknowledging receipt of their copies of Der Tonwille. The reviews of his recent concert were
cooler than the audience’s reception, and the concert suffered a financial loss; nonetheless he
hopes to persevere with public performances as a pianist. Finally, he wishes Schenker luck with
his new publisher, Drei Masken Verlag.
-
OJ 6/7, [17] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 2, 1925
Schenker, repeating some of the points made in earlier letters, continues to give an account of
Hertzka's dishonest dealings with him over Der Tonwille and asks Violin to give him an accurate count of the
subscriptions that Max Temming paid for in the distribution of free copies of the journal to university music
departments. He asks if Violin suspects that anti-Semitism lurks behind some of the critical notices of his recent
concert. Finally, he mentions an article in Die Musik by Paul Bekker that numbers Schenker among the hermeneutists;
the same issue contains a review of Der Tonwille, by Max Broesicke-Schon, disputing the supreme genius of the
canonic composers.
-
OC 52/647 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 5, 1925
Violin explains why, and how, the number of free copies of Der Tonwille
distributed to German university music departments was reduced from 10 per university to 7.
He has seen Paul Bekker's recent book, which includes a survey of recent trends in music
theory.
-
OJ 8/4, [35] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14,
1925
Schenker asks Violin urgently to send him the receipt for payment made to
Universal Edition (for the copies of Der Tonwille paid for by Max Temming).
-
OJ 6/7, [18] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his recent letter (and enclosure), which contains
evidence of Hertzka's false calculations of subscriptions to Der Tonwille – this letter in stark
contrast to the actions of his pupils Weisse and Brünauer, who had given more support to the
publication of Weisse's recently published vocal quartets than to his writings. Leaving Der
Tonwille behind, which has earned him little money and caused him much misery, he has written a
lengthy study of Bach's solo violin works, which will be published in the first volume of Das
Meisterwerk in der Musik, which will include a critique of Ernst Kurth's Grundlagen des linearen
Kontrapunkts.
-
OJ 14/45, [109] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, undated, postmarked February 24,
1925
Visiting his dying brother Eduard in the Sophienspital in Vienna, Violin hopes
to see Schenker if at all possible.
-
OC 52/648 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 5, 1925
Violin sends Schenker receipts for the purchase of Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [19] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 10, 1925
Continuing the story of the ongoing financial battle against Hertzka and
Universal Edition, Schenker thanks Violin for providing confirmation of the subscriptions paid
for by Max Temming, then recounts that, at a meeting with Hertzka and his bookkeeper, the
order-book for Der Tonwille had several pages torn out. Schenker is upset that his lawyer Dr.
Baumgarten, though an old friend, is not fully supportive of his position and would prefer seek
a compromise with Hertzka; this, Schenker feels, would rob him of much of his hard-earned
royalties, especially from the Beethoven sonata edition. He now asks Violin to find a contact –
outside Hamburg – who would be willing to order nine copies of Tonwille 1, as evidence that this
issue is still in demand, despite Hertzka's claims to the contrary. He has attended a
performance of Hans Weisse's Sextet, of which he found the variation movement and the trio
section of the scherzo to be the most satisfactory parts.
-
OC 52/644 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated April 21, 1925
Violin has had the order for nine copies of Tonwille 1 placed in Berlin, and
has collected the receipts. He has not heard from Weisse, but attended a performance of his
String Sextet and, like Schenker, found the variations and the trio section of the scherzo
the most successful.
-
OJ 8/4, [36] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 23, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for ordering copies of Tonwille 1. He gives a brief
account of a visit from Furtwängler, and mentions the arrival of the bronze medallion with
his likeness (designed by Alfred Rothberger).
-
OJ 6/7, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 4, 1925
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker sends Violin money for arranging the order of
Der Tonwille (which must consist of multiple copies of Tonwille 1); Hertzka's representative,
Robert Scheu, is currently studying the papers relating to Schenker's threat of legal action.
Schenker continues to express his astonishment at Furtwängler's ignorance of sonata form, a fact
that does not prevent him from earning huge fees for conducting in New York. He has turned down
a request from a lady who teaches in New York and a former pupil (now in St. Gallen), who wish
to spend some time with him in Galtür. He enquires about the personal difficulties that Violin
writes about in his letter, and asks him to say more; they will invite his sister for a visit.
He will send him a copy of the medallion (designed by Alfred Rothberger); the portrait by Viktor
Hammer is not yet finished.
-
OJ 6/7, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 16, 1925
Making preparations with his solicitor for the legal action against Universal
Edition, Schenker asks Violin to find out whether Max Temming paid for the additional
subscriptions to Der Tonwille directly through Albert Gutmann in Vienna, or through the firm of
Hofmeister in Leipzig. He is nearing completion of the contents of the first Meisterwerk
yearbook and asks Violin whether he has yet made summer plans and whether these might include a
trip to Galtür.
-
OC 52/618 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated May 26, 1925
Dealing at the same time with a family matter, Violin sends Schenker the
receipt for Max Temming's purchase of subscriptions to Der Tonwille and confirms that the
money for this was sent to the Leipzig office of Universal Edition. He is not planning any
summer holiday this year.
-
OJ 6/7, [22] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 30, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his latest efforts to account for subscriptions to Der
Tonwille. He sends him the smaller version of the bronze medallion designed by Alfred
Rothberger.
-
OJ 14/45, [43] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 4, 1925
Violin thanks Schenker for sending him the small version of the medallion
designed by Alfred Rothberger. He does not want to give an account of the difficult times he
is facing, expecting that things will eventually turn out for the better. He returns some
money, left over from the purchase of copies of Tonwille 10, which Schenker had previously
sent him.
-
OJ 8/4, [37] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 9, 1925
Schenker asks Violin to write to one of the German university music
departments who received subscriptions to Der Tonwille through the generosity of Max
Temming, to find out if, and when, they received Tonwille 10, which was published in
January. He reports being on the verge of completing the first Meisterwerk
Yearbook.
-
OC 52/649 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 15, 1925
Violin has received letters from the music departments of two German
universities, which show that the tenth issue of Der Tonwille (published in January 1925)
was not received until June 10.
-
OJ 8/4, [38] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his most recent efforts concerning the
subscriptions to Der Tonwille; he is astonished to learn that Tonwille 10, published in
January 1925, did not reach some subscribers until June. He hopes that Violin will be able
to visit him in the Tyrol this summer, as he is expecting Vrieslander with his
son.
-
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
-
OJ 14/45, [108] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 28, 1925
Unable to leave Hamburg this summer because of financial difficulties, but having
nothing worth saying in a letter, Violin asks for some news from Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [24] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 15, 1925
After expressing his sympathy for Violin, in response to his friend's depressing
postcard, Schenker gives an account of some of the summer events, including a visit from
Vrieslander and Hoboken and work on two essays for Meisterwerk 2. While continuing to rail
against Hertzka and Universal Edition, he repeats the story of Drei Masken Verlag failing to
send him 250 Marks upon receipt of the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. His brother Moses is,
however, acquainted with the principal owner of Drei Masken, Felix Sobotka, and through this
connection the payment has been made.
-
OJ 8/4, [39] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated, postmarked
August 27, 1925
Schenker sends greetings from the Tyrol, reports the publication of an article
on him by Elsa Bienenfeld, which includes a reproduction of his pupil Alfred Rothberger's
bronze medallion.
-
OJ 14/45, [45] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated August 28, 1925
Violin, in a philosophical mood, thanks Schenker for his concerns; he paints a
pessimistic picture of the world in general, embracing the injustices that his friend must
also suffer.
-
JOB 94-3, [14] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated September 9, 1925
Schenker informs Hammer that the drawing from which the Schenker mezzotint was
made has been sold.
-
OJ 9/12, [5] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated September 27,
1925
Bamberger is officially a "conductor" at Danzig. -- He asks how to obtain a
Rothberger medallion of Schenker and inquires after Hammer's etching. -- He reports on
Hupka's progress in Cologne, and inquires after F.E. von Cube.
-
OJ 11/36, [23] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated October 6, 1925
Hammer encloses as a gift two prints of his mezzotint of Schenker; Weisse will
convey to Schenker a print from which the printing block of the mezzotint can be made for
Die Musik's purposes. -- The Albertina has just purchased one of the
proofs.
-
JOB 94-3, [17] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hammer, dated October 18, 1925
Schenker quotes Schuster's response acknowledging receipt of the portrait and
anticipates publishing it [in Die Musik], perhaps with an accompanying
essay.
-
OJ 14/45, [46] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 23, 1925
Informing Schenker that he is beginning to recover after a disastrous year,
Violin reports that he has formed a trio with the violinist Mauritz van den Berg and the
cellist Friederich Buxbaum, and has scheduled concerts for January. His son has started
school, which he also regards as a blessing.
-
OJ 6/7, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 25, 1925
In this wide-ranging letter, Schenker commiserates with Violin about the high
cost of living, and his inability to raise his fees to keep up with it (in particular, he
feels unable to ask the wealthy Hoboken to pay more than his other pupils). He reports on
sales of a medallion bearing his image, and the imminent arrival of a mezzotint of his
portrait, made by Viktor Hammer, of which his brother Moses Schenker has bought the original
drawing. Vrieslander will write an essay about his work in Die Musik, accompanied by the
portrait, and things are now going well with the corrections to Meisterwerk 1 and the
writing of Meisterwerk 2.
-
OJ 14/45, [110] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 5, 1925
Violin gives Schenker the program of his concerts with van den Berg and
Buxbaum.
-
OJ 8/4, [40] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 21,
1925
Interrupting his correcting of the proofs for the first Meisterwerk Yearbook,
Schenker sends Christmas greetings to the Violins, and informs his friend that an
out-of-court settlement was made with Universal Edition. Recent concert appearances of the
cellist Buxbaum and the violinist van der Berg give him reason to believe that their trio
concerts with Violin will be successful. He has arranged for Hammer’s portrait of him to be
sent to Hamburg.
-
OJ 14/45, [47] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 25, 1925
Catching up on his correspondence on Christmas Day, Violin thanks Schenker for
his recent postcard, and hopes that 1926 will be a less troublesome year for him. He quotes
an extract from a negative review of Berg's Wozzeck, and reports on his practice and
rehearsal plans for the trios that he will perform with van der Berg and Buxbaum in a
month's time.
-
OJ 14/45, [50] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 12, 1926
Violin asks Schenker if he would consider taking one of his pupils, Miss Agnes
Becker, as a pupil for the remainder of the teaching year.
-
OJ 6/7, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 15, 1926
Schenker agrees to to teach Violin's pupil Agnes Becker twice a week, as soon
as she is ready to come to Vienna. He reports Furtwängler's disillusionment with modern
music, and notes that Weingartner and Julius Korngold have expressed similar sentiments. He
is not optimistic that humanity in general will truly understand the classics, which
underscores the important of his (and Violin's) mission.
-
OJ 8/4, [42] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 11,
1926
Schenker enquires about Violin's trio concerts with Buxbaum and van den Berg
went and ask if Hammer's portrait has arrived. He reports on the possible difficulties in
putting together the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, on account of the numerous music examples
and separate Urlinie graphs, and summarizes the contents of the second
Yearbook.
-
OJ 14/45, [51] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 18, 1926
Violin, in the aftermath of two enormously successful trio concerts with
Mauritz van den Berg and Friedrich Buxbaum, gives an account of Buxbaum's vanity and the
difficulty this causes in rehearsals and more generally for the ensemble. His doctor has
recommended that he spends three weeks in Bad Gastein this summer. He has not yet received
Hammer's portrait of Schenker.
-
OJ 6/7, [28] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 1, 1926
In a wide-ranging letter responding to Moriz Violin's previous letter,
Schenker asks his friend to confide in him his personal troubles. He offers his support in
the wake of the recent display of vanity of the cellist Friedrich Buxbaum. He is trying to
find a way of getting the Hammer portrait to him safely, possibly by having it sent directly
from Artaria's art shop. Finally he confirms the lack of musical giftedness of his new pupil
Agnes Becker, recently arrived from Hamburg where Violin had been teaching
her.
-
OJ 14/45, [52] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 6, 1926
Responding to Schenker's continuing queries, Violin gives some details of
recent illnesses, the cure for which his doctor has ordered him to spend part of the summer
in Bad Gastein. He is awaiting the arrival of the Hammer portrait, and is considering the
future of his piano trio ensemble.
-
OJ 14/45, [111] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 13, 1926
Violin thanks Schenker for Hammer's excellent portrait of him, which has
finally arrived.
-
OJ 14/45, [53] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 7, 1926
Violin thanks Schenker for his recent postcard, gives a brief account of his
own illnesses, and gives a somewhat longer account of those of his son Karl, which will
complicate summer travel plans. He has learned from music shops in Hamburg that the
Erläuterungsausgabe of Op. 106 is not yet published, and has also heard that Schenker's
Beethoven sonata edition is no longer available; he asks Schenker if this is
true.
-
OC 54/83 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated June 15, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag are sending Schenker ten hard-bound complimentary copies of
the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, although he may contractually be entitled only to five
hard-bound and five paper-bound copies. They ask him to send the addresses to which review
copies may be sent. (Schenker has made some pencil notes about the receipients of the
complimentary copies.)
-
OJ 14/45, [112] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 5, 1926
Violin announces his arrival in Bad Gastein, to improve his health. The rest
of his family is in Bistrai, near Bielitz, in Silesia.
-
OJ 8/4, [43] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, written July 8, 1926
Schenker expresses his pleasure that the Violins are on holiday in Badgastein;
he enquires about whether Violin has received a complimentary copy of Meisterwerk 1, which
his publishers seem slow to dispatch, and whether he has further plans to give piano trio
concerts.
-
OJ 14/45, [54] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, undated, written July 13,
1926
Replying to Schenker's postcard of July 8 and the receipt of the first
Meisterwerk Yearbook, Violin singles out the article "Weg mit dem Phrasierungsbogen" and
remarks on passages in two Chopin etudes and in Beethoven's "Pathétique" Sonata which
Schenker would find interesting. There is no news concerning his piano trio (with Mauritz
van den Berg and Friedrich Buxbaum) but he is considering playing a concerto in the 1926-27
season.
-
OJ 14/45, [55] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 5, 1926
Violin reports that he had to cut short his holiday in Bad Gastein because his
son Karl was again seriously ill. The costs of treatment amounted to nearly 4000 Marks, and
this sum must be paid by the end of the year.
-
OJ 6/7, [29] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 7, 1926
Schenker conveys his personal grief over the serious illness of Violin's son
Karl. He philosophizes about the ills of the world, noting financial difficulties recently
faced by Vrieslander, Dahms, and van der Berg. He reports Robert Pollak's imminent departure
for San Francisco.
-
OJ 14/45, [56] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 10, 1926
Violin reports that his son Karl's health has improved, but that he has to
find a new apartment because Karl cannot stay on the ground floor. He will obtain a copy of
the current issue of Die Musik, and reports that a review of (presumably) Meisterwerk 1 has
appeared in the Hamburger Fremdenblatt.
-
OJ 8/4, [44] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 10,
1926
Schenker enquires about the health of Violin and his son Karl. He has received
a cordial letter from Hindemith, assuring him that the fruits of his theory may be found in
his works, including the Urlinie; he has responded politely but candidly.
-
OJ 14/45, [57] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated November 17, 1926
Violin reports on having moved to a new apartment, no longer on the ground
floor, which his sister and (especially) a friend in Berlin named Martha Loeb have helped to
finance. He is amused what Schenker told him about his letter from Hindemith, whose words,
he believes, ought to be taken at face value.
-
OJ 6/7, [30] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 19, 1926
Schenker expresses his delight that his friend received sufficient financial
help to be able to move into a new apartment for the sake of his son Karl's health. He
reports having shown Agnes Becker some straightforward examples of the Urlinie, out of
desperation (she shows little aptitude for piano playing), and then explains that a great
deal of time, patience and faith are needed to understand such things. Of his current
pupils, only Elias, Brünauer, Hoboken and (to some extent) Albersheim are capable of
following the ramifications of the new theory, which he sees as his unique gift to the
world. At present, he is working on his "crowning work," Free Composition.
-
OJ 14/45, [60] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 3, 1927
Violin reports on his son Karl's continued health problems and also his
affection for his "Onkel Heinrich" (and with it, a wish to be in Vienna rather than in
Hamburg). Agnes Becker has apparently sent Schenker some analytical work on a sonata for
comment. Finally, he announces a forthcoming concert, with (Egon) Pollak, of a concerto for
two pianos by C. P. E. Bach in an arrangement by Schenker.
-
OC 54/193 List of review copies for Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, vol. 1
List of review copies for the first Meisterwerk
yearbook.
-
OJ 6/7, [32] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated February 16, 1927, with postscript
from Fanny Violin
Replying to Violin's previous letter, Schenker expresses surprise about (Egon)
Pollak's enthusiasm for C. P. E. Bach's Double Concerto. He also expresses uncertainty about
whether to accept an honor from the Academy of Arts and Science in Vienna. A translation and
adaptation of part of his Counterpoint, vol. 2, has been prepared; and Herman Roth's book on
counterpoint has also been published. He sends little Karl a picture of himself, and leaves
space for Violin's sister Fanny to add a short greeting.
-
OJ 14/45, [61] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 23, 1927
Following a brief description of a recent illness, Violin replies to
Schenker's question about accepting the Order of Merit from the Viennese Academy of Art and
Science and advises him to accept it. He realizes that staying in Hamburg would be bad for
his son's long-term health and has spoken to Artur Schnabel about the possibility of moving
to Berlin or Frankfurt. An influential man in Frankfurt is the father-in-law of Paul Klenau;
Violin knows of Klenau's respect for Schenker, and asks his friend to write to Klenau in
support of his application for a post there.
-
OJ 8/4, [46] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked [February] 26,
1927
Responding to a request from Violin, Schenker says he will write to Paul von
Klenau on behalf of Violin, apparently in connection with a possible position in
Frankfurt.
-
OJ 8/4, [47] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 27, 1927
Schenker is about to write to Paul von Klenau on Violin's behalf, but asks
whether he should wait until Easter, as suggested in Violin's previous
letter.
-
OJ 14/45, [62] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 2, 1927
Violin thanks Schenker for his willingness to intervene on his behalf with
regard to a position in Frankfurt, and asks him to get in touch with Paul von Klenau before
a possible meeting in person at Easter.
-
OJ 12/11, [11] Handwritten letter from Klenau to Schenker, undated [c. March 23, 1927]
Klenau agrees to approach his brother-in-law to help Moriz Violin. — He
responds to a comment by Schenker about Albert Schweizer.
-
OJ 8/4, [48] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 27,
1927
Schenker has written to Paul von Klenau on Violin's behalf, and received an
assurance that Klenau will write to his brother-in-law (not father-in-law, as Violin had
originally thought) but thinks that Artur Schnabel will be more influential. Klenau will
visit the Schenkers on Saturday.
-
OJ 8/4, [49] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 29, 1927
In advance of seeing Klenau, Schenker reports on a meeting with Wilhelm
Altmann and Ludwig Rottenberg, who believe that only people under 30 years old are likely to
be appointed to a post of the sort that Violin is seeking in Frankfurt – a situation that he
finds appalling.
-
OJ 14/45, [63] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 31, 1927
In reply to Schenker's recent postcards, Violin maintains that Klenau's
support for his appointment in Frankfurt is important, as the Ministry of Education in
Berlin can exert only a limited amount of pressure on the Frankfurt circle.
-
OJ 14/45, [113] Handwritten postcard from Violin to Schenker, dated April 6, 1927
In a reply to a recent letter, Violin thanks Schenker for the news concerning
the position he is hoping to obtain in Frankfurt and asks him whether Klenau might discover
what the people in Frankfurt think of him as a candidate.
-
OJ 14/45, [64] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated April 14, 1927
Violin thanks Schenker for his article (on Beethoven). He is still hoping for
a positive reply regarding Paul von Klenau's support for him in Frankfurt.
-
OJ 15/15, [22] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 14, 1927
Weisse calls his teacher's attention to a recent article by Edmund Schmid,
which questions the objectivity of Schenker's Beethoven research and deplores the slavish
adherence of his disciples to the concept of Urlinie.
-
OJ 8/4, [50] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 25, 1927
Schenker explains that what he is doing behind the scene to assist Violin in
obtaining a post in Frankfurt, and hopes for some news from Wilhelm Altmann. Artur Schnabel
will be more useful to his cause than Paul von Klenau and his brother-in-law Heinrich
Simon.
-
OJ 6/7, [33] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 27, 1927
Schenker has tried to find out more about the plans for the conservatory in
Frankfurt to be upgraded to a music Hochschule (and, presumably, for Violin to be posted
there), but he is reluctant to press his contacts too far, as this may prove
counterproductive.
-
OJ 14/45, [65] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated June 6, 1927
Violin still maintains that Paul von Klenau's petitioning on his behalf would
provide a strong measure of support for his application for a post in
Frankfurt.
-
OJ 14/45, [66] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 17, 1927
In deepest admiration and gratitude, Violin sends Schenker (59th) birthday
greetings and pictures of his children.
-
OJ 6/7, [34] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 30, 1927
Schenker answers Violin's birthday greetings letter philosophically. He is
able to work on the final version Der freie Satz at leisure and in good spirits. He reports
on the establishment of an archive of photographic reproductions of autograph and gives an
account of a visit from Violin's sister Fanny: in return for a picture of Karl Violin, he is
enclosing two pictures of himself and one of Jeanette. Finally, he urges his friend to spend
part of the summer in Galtür.
-
OJ 6/7, [35] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated August 5, 1927
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker underscores the importance of his friend's
taking a holiday, and tries to persuade him to visit him in Galtür. There he was visited by
Reinhard Oppel, who has been appointed to a theory post at the Leipzig Conservatory, where
he will teach from Schenker's texts. He comments at length on the decline of society, as
exemplified by the July Revolt. The second Meisterwerk volume has gone to the bookbinders;
until it is published, he will be working on Der freier Satz.
-
OJ 14/45, [67] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated August 13, 1927
Violin reports that he was hoping to get away, but things came up that he had
to deal with, which made the summer the saddest of his life. His wife and son will move to
Vienna in the fall, and he will be there for Christmas.
-
OJ 89/1, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated September 6, 1927
Schenker comments on Hoboken's Appeal [for the Photogrammarchiv], sets out what
is necessary for correctly reading an autograph manuscript and understanding its relationship to
the first edition, and rails against the tendency of performers, including Furtwängler, to think
such matters trivial.
-
OJ 8/4, [51] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 5, 1927
Schenker has asked a former pupil (Felix-Eberhard von Cube), who knows Dr.
Simon in Frankfurt, about the likely opening date of a music Hochschule there, but has
received little information in return. the second volume of Meisterwerk will be published
very soon.
-
OJ 14/45, [68] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 13, 1927
Violin thanks Schenker for sending him the second volume of Meisterwerk, which
he regards as a milestone in offering the strongest statement of his theories. He is
accompanying a cellist in early January and will not be able to get to Vienna at Christmas
after all. His wife and son – who is now able to get up and around – are hoping to go to
Vienna at Easter.
-
OJ 8/4, [52] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 16, 1927
Schenker congratulates Violin on obtaining many private pupils, and for his
continued activity as a performer. He expresses his joy that Violin's son Karl will be
visiting Vienna next year.
-
OJ 14/45, [69] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated December 27, 1927
Violin reports that his concert (cello recital) has been put back a week
because of a tendon problem in his left hand. He owes Otto Vrieslander a response to his
recent written work, but he feels that Vrieslander does not truly understand Schenker's
cause, does not have the same "orientation" towards it as he, and expresses himself poorly.
(Weisse, he says, could have done things better.) However, all this pettiness is nothing
compared with the achievement of Meisterwerk 2, and of the "crowning" work that will soon
follow.
-
OJ 6/7, [36] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 29, 1927
Sending greetings for the New Year, Schenker expresses the hope that his
friend's fortunes will begin to improve in 1928. He agrees with Violin's pronouncements on
Vrieslander’s character and ability to convey Schenker's thoughts, and has no idea of what
to expect in Vrieslander's (supposedly) forthcoming monograph on him. Weisse, whom he
regards as a more skilled interpreter of his work, has announced plans for a monthly
journal, Die Tonkunst, to be edited with his pupils Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer, which
will be based exclusively on Schenker's theoretical approach. But he is afraid that Weisse
might leave Vienna, to teach at Damrosch's music school.
-
OJ 15/15, [27] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated Januray 21, 1928
Weisse is trying to arrange a time to see Schenker. He has not heard from
Reinhard Oppel (presumably about his projected periodical, Die Tonkunst, but has received a
letter from Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 8/4, [54] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 2, 1928
The Schenkers invite Violin to an evening meal at their
apartment.
-
OJ 14/45, [70] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 17, 1928
Violin sends 60th birthday greetings to Schenker, adding that he is unlikely
to leave Hamburg this summer.
-
OJ 6/7, [38] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 23,
1928
Schenker thanks Violin for his kind birthday greetings, explaining the
discrepant birth dates assigned to him. He reaffirms his spiritual solidarity with his
friend. He has read some articles and reviews mentioning his work, at all of which he
laughs.
-
OJ 8/4, [55] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 3,
1928
Schenker asks Violin to write to Fritz Stein, to ask him to return one of his
arrangements of a musical work.
-
OJ 14/45, [71] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 18, 1928
Owing to a "complete breakdown," Violin is recovering at a sanatorium in
Schierke, from where he writes. In response to Schenker's previous postcard, Violin had
written more than once to Prof. [Fritz?] Stein for the return of the manuscript of a Handel
arrangement by Schenker, and he will chase him up in August. A pupil of his, Harry Hahn, has
taken upon himself to lecture on Schenker's theories at the local society of composers; for
this he has prepared classroom-size enlargements of voice-leading graphs of a Bach prelude
and a Schubert waltz, and has proved a surprisingly competent and persuasive
speaker.
-
OJ 6/7, [39] Handwritten envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked July 22, 1928
Schenker asks about Violin's breakdown, and comments on Halm's avoidance of
fearful situations and on Cube's shop window exhibition.
-
OJ 8/4, [56] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 25,
1928
Writing to the sanatorium in the Harz mountains, Schenker ask Violin how
things are with him.
-
OJ 15/16, [59] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 26, 1928
Writing while on holiday (in Bad Aussee), Weisse apologizes for not having
replied to Schenker's previous letter. He is enjoying reading C. P. E. Bach's Versuch, and
reports the illness and recovery of Viktor Hammer, who was staying in Grundlsee near the Weisses
during the month of June.
-
OJ 8/4, [57] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked September 5,
1928
Having just returned from the Tyrol, Schenker asks how Violin and his family.
He would also like to see the voice-leading diagrams that Violin's pupil Harry Hahn has
prepared for his lectures.
-
OJ 14/45, [72] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 21,
1928
Violin apologizes for not writing sooner; he has suffered a further health
setback. His pupil Harry Hahn will send Schenker the illustrations and a copy of his lecture
(on the Schubert waltz and Bach prelude). He enquires about Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 8/4, [58] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 9, 1928
Schenker is glad to hear that his friend's setback was only a minor one. He
has received a nice letter from Harry Hahn, together with a copy of his lecture and the
splendid voice-leading diagrams.
-
OJ 8/4, [59] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 22,
1928
The large-format graphs prepared by Harry Hahn have been greeted
enthusiastically by Schenker's pupils and friends; Schenker suggests that a "light
projection apparatus" (i.e. an overhead projector), which is now often available in schools
and hospitals, might be more practical.
-
OJ 14/45, [73] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 26, 1928
Violin queries Schenker's suggestion for displaying graphic work by
light-projection. He has recently made the acquaintance of a Hamburg organist name
Hahnemann, who teaches only according to Schenker's theory. Finally he asks whether the
"last volume" (Der freie Satz) has been published.
-
OJ 8/4, [60] Handwritten poscard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 22,
1928
The Schenkers send the Violins their best wishes.
-
OJ 14/45, [74] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 24, 1928
On his first teaching-free day, Violin writes to say that his health is good,
and to wish the Schenkers a happy holiday. His organist friend Hahnemann will probably write
to Schenker soon about performing some of his arrangements. Schnabel, too, wants to obtain
the score, parts and cadenzas for the keyboard concertos of C. P. E. Bach that Schenker has
prepared.
-
OJ 14/45, [75] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated February 25, 1929
Violin has heard terrible things from Vienna on account of the extremely cold
weather, and hope that the Schenkers are in good health. His brother-in-law will take him on
holiday at Easter, and also pay for a family holiday in the summer.
-
OJ 6/7, [41] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 27, 1929
Schenker thanks Violin for his concerns, describes how they survived the cold
weather earlier in February, reports that his monograph on the "Eroica" Symphony is finished
and that he has written an article about the Photogram Archive, which has acquired over
seven thousand pages of manuscripts. He looks forward to seeing his friend in the
summer.
-
OJ 14/45, [76] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 3, 1929
On the point of departing for the Riviera with his brother-in-law – possibly
via Vienna – Violin asks Schenker to make a quick assessment of his voice-leading reduction
of Bach's first Two-Part Invention, in C major.
-
OJ 6/7, [42] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 7,
1929
In reply to Violin's previous letter, Schenker writes out a graphic analysis
of Bach's Two-Part Invention in C major, and wishes him an enjoyable holiday on the French
Riviera.
-
OJ 14/45, [77] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 20, 1929
Violin thanks Schenker for his letter with the voice-leading sketch of Bach's
C major Invention, and for the article from Der Kunstwart on the Photogram Archive. He is
enjoying the climate of Nice, and seems to be getting on well with the French language; a
lady who overheard him playing the piano praised his expressive playing.
-
OJ 14/45, [78] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated April 29, 1929
Violin has finally paid off a large debt, and promises to save enough money so
that he can spend a few days in Galtür with the Schenkers. He apologizes for any
indiscretion on the part of his sister Fanny.
-
OJ 8/4, [62] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated May 3, 1929
Schenker assures Violin that there is no friction whatever between his sister
Fanny and himself; he looks forward to seeing him in the summer.
-
OJ 14/45, [79] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated June 16, 1929
In spite of an earlier promise, Violin says he cannot visit the Schenkers in
Galtür because he must stay with his son, who has had an inflammation of his kidney
following the news of the death of Otto Schreier. He will instead take his son on a holiday
in the Harz Mountains, and hopes to visit Vienna in the autumn or over
Christmas.
-
OJ 14/45, [114] Handwritten picture postcard from Moriz and Karl Violin to Schenker, undated,
postmarked July 16, [1929]
Violin and his son have taken a bus to Brocken in the Harz mountains, the
highest point in northern Germany.
-
OJ 6/7, [43] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 13, 1929
Urging his friend to write only when he feels up to it, Schenker gives Violin
some news of his own: that the Eroica Symphony monograph is finished but a publisher who is
capable of dealing with the numerous music examples must be found; that Schenker will work
unceasingly on Der freie Satz once the Eroica is out of the way; that the Photogram Archive
has grown in size in two years, and that so many requests for information have been received
that a yearbook is planned, with critical reports, new editions, and the like; that Hoboken
and Vrieslander have fallen out (over money matters); that Schenker's brother Mozio (Moses)
has separated from his wife after 25 years of marriage and that he his has been giving music
lessons to Mozio’s son, a cellist in the Baden city orchestra.
-
OJ 14/45, [80] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 19, 1929
Violin apologizes for not having written, but does not want to burden Schenker
with negative thoughts. He will try to help find a publisher for the "Eroica" analysis, and
also offers some thoughts of comfort on hearing the news that Schenker's brother and
sister-in-law have separated. He has little energy left, but is somehow able to muster it
when needed, e.g. at a sold-out orchestral concert in which he played better than ever. He
promises to be in Vienna over Christmas.
-
OJ 6/7, [44] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated November 24, 1929
After reply to some of the more personal points in Violin's previous letter,
Schenker welcomes his friend's efforts to look for a publisher for the Eroica Symphony
monograph, noting that, in spite of the difficulties that Hertzka has caused him, his books
are still in print and his status as a theorist has been acknowledged by the the fact that
the universities of Heidelberg and Leipzig have expressed an interest in appointing him. A
recent article in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung will give Violin further ammunition when
approaching a publisher. That same issue also contains an article by Schoenberg touching on
various canonic works (Bach, Prelude in C sharp minor for the Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1;
Beethoven, Seventh Symphony, finale; Mozart, slow introduction to the "Dissonant" Quartet).
He feels that it is beneath his dignity to make a formal reply; but to illustrate what he
means, and why he is contemptuous of Schoenberg, he provides several voice-leading graphs
and other music examples concerning these works.
-
OJ 14/45, [81] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated December 19, 1929
Violin has two possible publishers for the "Eroica" monograph. One of these he
names as Rather in Leipzig, which has recently bought up Simrock. The other, Breitkopf &
Härtel, has been suggested by Furtwängler, who believes that the proposal would be supported
by Karl Straube. Violin also considers the possibility replying to a recent article by
Schoenberg.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OJ 14/45, [83] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated January 24, 1930
Violin has learned that the proprietor of Rather-Verlag is unwell, and that
there would be no chance of Schenker's having his "Eroica" Symphony monograph published
there. He also reports on declining cultural and human values, of which the recent success
of jazz-based works, staged in German opera houses, is emblematic. He is going to Berlin to
investigate possible employment there.
-
OJ 6/7, [47] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated March 2, 1930
Schenker reports on two concerts at which Hans Weisse's Octet was performed
for the first time. Furtwängler was enchanted by it, Schenker was impressed by the quality
of the voice-leading in general, the construction of the finale movement (a passacaglia) in
particular. He was touched to see that a pupil of Weisse's, Dr. Felix Salzer, had subvented
the cost of the rehearsals and concerts, and the provision of food and drink for the
audience; this he compared with Antony van Hoboken's reluctance to help him with the
publication costs of his recent work.
-
OJ 14/45, [84] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated May 15, 1930
Violin apologizes for not having written, but his family have moved to a more
affordable apartment and, around the same time, his wife was taken seriously ill with
appendicitis. Things are better now.
-
OJ 6/7, [48] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 19, [1930]
After congratulating Violin on moving house, Schenker reports that an article
that is critical of the "Urlinie", by Walter Riezler, has apparently offended Furtwängler, a
childhood friend of the author. Furtwängler hoped that Hans Weisse might write a response;
in the end, Brünauer wrote one, and Weisse has sent it to Furtwängler. Schenker has himself
replied to an article by Eduard Beninger in the February 1930 issue of the Zeitschrift für
Musik. Owing to overwork, he was required to rest during the day between lessons; now he is
better. Oppel is again coming to Galtür and Schenker hopes that Violin will join him there,
too.
-
OJ 14/45, [85] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Jeanette Schenker, dated June 16,
1930
Violin thanks Jeanette Schenker for sending him a recent article. His wife and
daughter will spend the summer holiday with his brother-in-law, who is also paying for a
three-week holiday for him and his son Karl.
-
OJ 14/45, [115] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 3, 1930
Violin is spending two weeks with Karl in Schierke, in the Harz Mountains. In
the fall, he will have to make a decision about what to do about his son.
-
OJ 6/7, [49] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 10, 1930
Acknowledging his recent letter to Jeanette, Schenker expresses his regret
that Violin and his son Karl are still troubled by health problems and reports some recent
news. Furtwängler's intervention with Breitkopf & Härtel on behalf of Weisse's Octet was
in vain; he had also sought the same firm's agreement to publish the "Eroica" analysis, but
this will now appear as the third Meisterwerk Yearbook. The Schenkers are expecting many
visitors in Galtür, including Furtwängler, Reinhard Oppel, Schenker's nephew and his wife,
and Jeanette's sister and family. Hoboken is prepared to fund the publication of a collected
edition of the works of C. P. E. Bach (with financial support from the city of Hamburg), but
Schenker is cautious about this because his paid involvement in the project might result in
work that would jeopardize progress on Der freie Satz. He has been included in the latest
edition of Meyers Konversations-Lexicon, and has received favorable citation in Romain
Rolland's latest Beethoven book.
-
OJ 14/45, [86] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 23, 1930
Violin despairs of the future for his son, who has just turned 17, and about
life in general. He has faith only in Schenker, whom he sees as truly a product of his time,
because of his intimate attachment to the great achievements of bygone eras. He thinks that
the rest of the world will recognize in half a century what he knows now; he has no interest
in Furtwängler, who may appear to be modest in Schenker's company, but is no less arrogant
than any other idiot when left to his own devices. He is concerned about things that might
interfere with the completion of Schenker's last works.
-
OJ 6/7, [50] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 31, 1930
Schenker assures his friend that he understands his difficulties, and that he
can be proud of holding his head high above those who do not understand music, or are
incapable of interpreting it beautifully. His own problems are focussed around money,
especially as his brother (Moses) has not given him the second part of his inheritance. He
has sought to find cheaper ways of producing the music examples for his latest writings: he
is more satisfied with the Eroica examples than the engraved illustrations from previous
volumes of Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, and is planning to issue Der freie Satz with a
volume of examples that is separate from the text. He repeats the news, from an earlier
letter, of his being mentioned in Romain Rolland's most recent Beethoven book, and of his
entry in Meyers Konversations-Lexicon, and also reports on an item about him in the Deutsche
Tonkünstler-Lexikon.
-
OJ 14/45, [87] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 13, 1930
Violin has just heard that Hans Weisse will be lecturing in Berlin in
December; he plans to go there to hear him. His pupil Agnes Becker, returning from a trip to
London, has discovered that Schenker's Beethoven sonata edition is much in demand,
especially from students at the Royal Academy of Music.
-
OJ 14/45, [88] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Jeanette Schenker, dated October 18,
1930
Upon hearing from Furtwängler that Schenker is unwell, Violin asks Jeanette
for news about him.
-
OJ 6/7, [51] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated October 21,
1930
Writing after a long and serious illness, Schenker assures his friend that he
is alive and well. The doctors have pronounced him generally fit, but he suffers from a
painful tightening of the thorax, and also a flickering that causes him to "lose" letters
and notes. He has had to give many double-lessons of late, in theory, which he finds tiring.
To Hoboken, who, though gifted, is concerned only about his money and often comes to lessons
without having prepared anything, he would rather play than give over-long lectures. He is
concerned, for his own sake as much as for Weisse's, about the lectures in Berlin that
Weisse will deliver, and about his eagerness to debate with Alfred Lorenz; he is glad that
Violin is going to Berlin, and will give him instructions about what to do there. His
Beethoven sonata edition brings in 100 shillings per month – a good deal for the publishers
– and his brother still has half of his inheritance. But he is still alive – with Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 5/7a, [33] (formerly vC 33) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 10, [1930]
Discusses attendance at Weisse's forthcoming lecture in Berlin; refers to two
articles in Die Musik.
-
OJ 6/7, [52] Letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated November
26, 1930
Schenker summarizes the achievements and ambitions of several of his pupils
and followers (Albersheim, Cube, Vrieslander, Roth, Jonas, and Weisse), noting that Weisse
is the most ambitious of all of these though he is not completely at home in the new theory.
He fears that something might go wrong at Weisse's forthcoming lecture at the Central
Institute for Music Education, and hopes that Violin will listen with a sharp ear. Weisse
will give a trial run of the lecture at the Schenkers' apartment.
-
OJ 15/16, [65] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 27, 1930
Weisse thanks Schenker for the essay "Rameau oder Beethoven?". He is surprised
to hear that Jonas has sought Schenker's help in finding employment, and urges Schenker not
to write a letter of recommendation until a concrete piece of work materializes. He is about
to go to Berlin to deliver two lectures on Schenker's theories, and has heard that Moriz
Violin and Reinhard Oppel will be there; he would like to give one of these lectures at
Schenker's home before a small audience of his most dedicated pupils, and suggests a date
and time for this.
-
OJ 8/5, [1] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 2,
1930
Schenker suspects that Weisse, with Leo Kestenberg's support and Furtwängler's
help, is hoping for an appointment in Berlin.
-
OJ 5/7a, [34] (formerly vC 34) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated December 5, 1930
Gives dates and place of Weisse's lectures in Vienna.
-
OJ 14/45, [116] Handwritten picture postcard from Moriz Violin and others to Schenker, undated, c.
December 10, 1930
Moriz Violin, Hans Weisse, Anthony van Hoboken, Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer
send greetings to Schenker, following Weisse's lectures in Berlin.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 8/5, [2] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 28,
1931
Schenker has heard about Violin’s letter to Weisse [concerning the founding of
a Schenker Institute in Hamburg] and expresses his interest in it, noting that it will be
possible to teach composition only after Free Composition has been
published.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [1] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 12, 1931
Violin says that things are in order [with the planned Schenker Institute in
Hamburg], but that Hans Weisse will not take part. He will visit Vienna at the end of the
month to consult his friend, whom he asks to say nothing about the matter to
Weisse.
-
OJ 8/5, [3] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated March 14,
1931
Schenker expresses his delight that Violin will soon be coming to
Vienna.
-
OJ 15/16, [69] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 19, 1931
Weisse asks Schenker’s approval to approach Furtwängler about Der freie Satz,
presumably to seek financial assistance for its publication. He has been given a copy of a
letter from Mozart to Baron van Swieten, but expresses his doubts about the tone of one of
Mozart’s phrases; he hopes to meet Schenker soon, to talk about Bruckner.
-
OJ 6/8, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated April 14, 1931
Having heard that Weisse is leaving for America, Schenker asks if Violin has
had a response from Cube. He has had a postcard from a pupil of Cube’s, Erich Voss, who
would like to know the content of Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 9/34, [24] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 25, 1931
Cube is busy disposing of his house and dealing with his father's estate; he is
moving to Hamburg to work with Moriz Violin after a short holiday.
-
OJ 9/34, [25] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 9, 1931
Cube describes his feelings and final dealings with the Conservatory in Duisburg,
and preparations for work with Violin in Hamburg; he reports on his two best pupils, Erich Voss
and Lieselotte Müller.
-
OJ 6/8, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 24, 1931
Schenker sends Violin clippings of a positive anonymous review of Das
Meisterwerk 3, and an article by Bruno Walter from the Neue freie Presse mentioning
him.
-
OJ 15/16, [77] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated June 1, 1931
Weisse sends Schenker a letter written by Furtwängler, from which it can be
inferred that a major subvention for the printing costs of Meisterwerk III has been obtained
and that there is every reason to expect that a significant part of the costs of publishing
Der freie Satz will also be met.
-
OJ 5/7a, [36] (formerly vC 36) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated June 6, 1931
Schenker will write to Cube from Galtür, with Mozart calling
card.
-
OJ 8/5, [4] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked June 6,
1931
Furtwängler has sent 3,000 Marks via Hans Weisse for the costs of Das
Meisterwerk 3, and Weisse will continue to seek the funds for Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 6/8, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated June 11, 1931
Schenker expresses his feelings about the establishment of a music school in
Hamburg named after him, believing it to represent a spiritual union of Violin with himself.
He is sending him some recent compositions by Weisse, which he finds well
composed.
-
OJ 5/7a, [38] (formerly vC 38) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated June 30, 1931
Schenker encloses the [Mozart calling] card, and sends an article from Der Kunstwart; he
emphasizes that Moriz Violin's new institute is a "school," not a "seminar," and offers detailed advice;
comments that his theory from Harmonielehre to Meisterwerk constitutes a self-contained whole; recommends use of
C. P. E. Bach's Versuch with his theory applied to the examples; and foretells the Urlinie-Tafeln that should be
available to Violin/Cub in Hamburg and to Weisse in New York. His eyes have suffered and need complete
rest.
-
OJ 8/5, [5] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated July 13,
[1931]
Schenker asks Violin if he has yet seen the review of Meisterwerk 3 in the
current issue of Die Musik, which has raised his standing in the world.
-
OC 38/155v Handwritten letter (fragment) from Violin to Schenker, dated July 18,
1931
Violin’s son collapsed while away on a school holiday, but is now recovering.
The family are about to move to a new apartment in Hamburg, and Violin is sending Schenker a
copy of the prospectus for the Schenker Institute.
-
OJ 8/5, [6] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated July 24, 1931
Schenker expresses his astonishment at what the Violin family has had to
endure, and thanks him for the Schenker Institute prospectus.
-
OJ 9/34, [26] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated August 19, 1931
Cube informs Schenker that Moriz Violin's son has been taken ill; Cube sends
Schenker a copy of the Schenker Institute prospectus.
-
OJ 5/7a, [39] (formerly vC 39) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, undated [August 22, 1931]
Acknowledges OJ 9/34, [26] and asks for further copies of the prospectus of the Schenker
Institute, Hamburg.
-
OJ 15/16, [81] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 5, 1931
Weisse outlines his travel plans before leaving for America. He has accepted
an invitation from Moriz Violin to give a lecture in Hamburg on September 16, the day before
he sets sail.
-
OJ 6/8, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 6, 1931
In this long, sentimental letter, Schenker thanks Violin for founding a
Schenker Institute in Hamburg and reflects on the intertwining of their fates through their
connection with C. P. E. Bach. He also advises on the wording of the Institute’s
prospectus.
-
OJ 9/34, [27] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 8, 1931
Line drawing of Moriz Violin. Cube reports on health of Violin's son; discusses his
relationship with Violin, and the prospects of the Schenker Institute in Hamburg; Cube will be assisting at
a lecture given by Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 6/8, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 28, 1931
Schenker is heartened that Herman Roth, once again, seems to be supporting his
cause. Schenker recommends a series of possible “guest speakers” at the Schenker Institute
and asks if there is some sort of monument or commemorative space devoted to C. P. E. Bach
in Hamburg.
-
OJ 12/9, [28] Typewritten letter and envelope from Karpath to Schenker, dated October 23,
1931
To Schenker's inquiry regarding Moriz Violin, Karpath gives information as to
how in the era of Perger and Bopp at the Vienna Conservatory professors and teachers were
addressed.
-
OJ 10/3, [156] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 13, 1931
Deutsch reports that Hoboken is probably going to keep his personal library in
Vienna. He is not optimistic that “V” [Moriz Violin] will be accorded the title of
Professor, which can be conferred only by the Vienna Academy and not to people living [i.e.
working] outside it.
-
OJ 10/3, [157] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
In advance of a meeting to discuss the conferral of an honor upon Anthony van
Hoboken, Deutsch asks Schenker to sound out Ludwig Karpath cautiously about enlisting his
support for this action.
-
OJ 9/34, [28] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
Cube reports enrollment and quality of students at the Schenker Institute,
Hamburg; his own teaching is increasingly small-group-tuition based, drawing on Tonwille and
Meisterwerk. Karl Violin is recovering.
-
OJ 6/8, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated October 17, 1931
Schenker offers Violin words of comfort in the light of a misappropriation of
the title “Professor.” He also describes progress on Chopin’s Op. 10, No. 12, and the Bach
Prelude in C major for the Five Analyses in Sketchform, and his work on a document of Anton
Schindler purporting to convey Beethoven’s instructions on the performance of the Op. 14
sonatas.
-
OJ 6/8, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated October 23, 1931
Schenker has written to Ludwig Karpath concerning the matter of Violin’s
appropriation of the title of “Professor” (as discussed in Schenker’s letter of October 17).
He hopes that his friend's difficulties are now entirely behind him.
-
OJ 5/7a, [40] (formerly vC 40) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, undated [c. October 29, 1931]
Angi Elias has made a fair copy of Cube's latest graph of the C major Prelude
(Wohltemperirtes Clavier, Book I), which Schenker may use in his seminar; Cube to write thanking
Elias; Schenker comments on changes to Cube's graph.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [2] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 4, 1931
Violin thanks Schenker for his package. He has been swamped by administrative
business concerning the Schenker Institute, but is sometimes able to argue about musical
matters with Felix-Eberhard von Cube. He thanks Schenker for correcting a mistake on Cube’s
part concerning the analysis of the end of the C major Prelude from the first book of Bach’s
Well-tempered Clavier.
-
OJ 11/16, [9] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November 8, 1931
Furtwängler would hear with Schenker. — He has heard good news of Weisse from
Violin.
-
OJ 8/5, [7] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 27,
1931
Inquiring about Violin’s difficulties at the Schenker Institute in Hamburg,
Schenker observes that there are many fewer conservatory students in Vienna, and also in
Berlin, because music teachers earn so little.
-
OJ 6/8, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 24, 1931
Thanking Violin for his recent letter, Schenker bemoans the present condition
of the world, and expresses the hope that his health will enable to see him through the
worst of the days to come.
-
OJ 9/34, [31] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 8, 1932
Cube sends Schenker an Urlinie graph of Schubert's song "Der Dopplegänger," and offers an
extended commentary. Describes his work and state of mind, and comments on working with Moriz Violin; he
expresses fears for the Hamburg Schenker Institut. He has just got married.
-
OJ 9/34, [32] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1932
Cube reports a conversation with Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 8/5, [10] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked May 12,
1932
Schenker expresses his joy at Violin’s forthcoming trip to Vienna and thanks
him for a clipping about C. P. E. Bach and the city of Hamburg.
-
OJ 6/8, [13] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated June 12,
1932
Schenker refers to his “betrayal” by Herman Roth and shares with Vrieslander’s
letter on the subject. He updates Violin on the forthcoming publication of the Fünf
Urlinie-Tafeln, accusing the Mannes School of getting more publicity and profits from the
sale of the work than it deserves.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [3] Handwritten fragmentary letter from Violin to Schenker, late June 1932
Violin will continue to fight for Schenker’s cause, but is not sure he will be
able to do it from Hamburg much longer; he will decide in October. He hopes that the
Schenkers are enjoying their summer holiday in Igls.
-
OJ 5/7a, [43] (formerly vC 43) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 6, 1932
Schenker acknowledges OJ 11/54, [33], and reports publication of songs and
Ländler by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 8/5, [11] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated September 1, 1932
Schenker reports that Der freie Satz is finished, apart from the final draft
of the manuscript.
-
OJ 12/6, [15] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 5, 1932
Jonas encloses sample page-make-up by Saturn-Verlag, and asks Schenker to send
addresses for recipients of invitations [to subscribe]. Reports on his professional
prospects and contacts in Berlin, and on reviewing.
-
OJ 9/34, [34] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 12, 1932
Cube outlines the conflict between Moriz Violin and the school authorities over
inspection of the Hamburg Schenker-Institut, portrays his own differences of opinion with
Violin, and asks for Schenker's opinion.
-
OJ 5/7a, [44] (formerly vC 44) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, postmarked September 16, 1932
In response to OJ 9/34, [34], Schenker thinks Cube right, but would need to see
the inspection before giving judgment.
-
OJ 8/5, [12] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 7, 1932
Schenker reports that Joseph Marx wants to adopt a revised version of his
Harmonielehre for the students at the Akademie für Musik und darstellende Kunst in
Vienna.
-
OC 44/22 Typewritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated November 10, 1932
Jonas acknowledges letter from Schenker and gives initial list of subscribers
with number of copies; he reports on two of his latest publications.
-
OJ 9/34, [35] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated December 7, 1932
Cube reports on his current state of mind, his work on a Bach graph (commenting
on a graph by Angi Elias), promises to send an article on Schenker that has appeared in the
Frankfurter Zeitung, on the difficulties of the Schenker-Institut, and on Moriz and Karl
Violin.
-
OJ 6/8, [14] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated December 19,
1932
In this characteristically long end-of-year letter to his friend, Schenker
mentions his forthcoming edition of Brahms’s study of consecutive octaves and fifths,
Jonas’s book on his achievements as a theorist, Zuckerkandl’s book on opera, and the
possibility of an English translation of his Theory of Harmony.
-
OC 38/346v Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated December 22, 1932
In this partly incoherent message which responds to Schenker’s recent letters,
especially that of December 19, Violin urges his friend to remain optimistic. He will
discuss things with Furtwängler that should be beneficial. He asks to borrow Hindemith’s
letter to Schenker.
-
OC 38/341v Handwritten letter from Moriz and Fanny Violin to Schenker, dated December 24,
1932
Violin asks Schenker’s opinion about a reply to a letter he sent to Joseph
Marx, who had been in Constantinople (Istanbul) for the purpose of regenerating a music
conservatory there; he encloses a copy of Marx’s reply, which mentions Schenker in
particular.
-
OJ 6/8, [15] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 25, 1932
In this letter, much of it written in a bitter and sarcastic tone, Schenker
urges Violin not to appeal to Anthony van Hoboken for financial help. He has sought
assistance for his friend from Ludwig Karpath and Josef Marx.
-
OeNB H Autogr.856/20-1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Josef Marx, dated December 25, 1932
Schenker has read articles by Marx in a newspaper expressing disatisfaction at
musical life in Vienna; Schenker asks urgently to have a face-to-face meeting with Marx to
discuss these matters and probably others concerning Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 6/8, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 29, 1932
Schenker advises Violin to keep up the pressure on Josef Marx regarding a
possible position at the Vienna Akademie; he will do the same. He again discourages his
friend from approaching Anthony van Hoboken with an appeal for financial
assistance.
-
OC 38/340v Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Fanny Violin, dated January 15,
1933
Moriz Violin reports to his sister Fanny on the use of money for Karl; adjures
her to be steadfast; says the doctor holds out possibility for recovery; asks for any news
on discussions between Schenker and Josef Marx; and wishes he could be in Vienna and with
little Karl. [This letter was passed to Heinrich Schenker.]
-
OJ 6/8, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 19, 1933
Schenker gives Violin an account of a three-hour meeting he had with Joseph
Marx, who expressed his highest regard for Schenker's theories; he expects that his writings
will be adopted by the Vienna Akademie and that Violin will also profit from Marx’s interest
and goodwill.
-
OeNB H Autogr.856/20-3 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Josef Marx, dated January 19, 1933
Schenker urges Marx to advocate on behalf of Moriz Violin as a candidate for a
post at the Akademie für Musik, extolling his qualities as musician and
colleague.
-
OC 18/45 Handwritten postcard from Josefine Violin to Karpath, dated January 23, 1933
Josefine Violin informs Karpath of the death of Karl Violin. Karpath sends
Schenker the card, and complains in an annotation about the disrespectful mode of
address.
-
OJ 6/8, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to the family of Moriz Violin, postmarked January
24, 1933
Schenker sends condolences, from Jeanette and himself, to the whole Violin
family on the death of Karl Violin, reassuring them that they did all they could in his
lifetime.
-
OJ 8/5, [15] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 15, 1933
Schenker reports reading a newspaper article in which Arnold Schoenberg was
not offered a post at the Vienna Academy, and draws from it a parallel with Violin and
himself.
-
OJ 8/5, [16] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 26, 1933
Schenker reports on Hans Weisse’s phenomenal success as a teacher in New York,
and complains about Joseph Marx’s duplicitous behavior.
-
OC 18/23 Typewritten letter from Josef Marx to Schenker, dated February 28, 1933
Marx thanks Schenker for hospitality on January 18. He lacks the influence at
the Vienna Akademie to introduce Schenker's theoretical system, but has advocated for the
inclusion of Schenker's name on the list of publications to be taken into account in its
teaching. He has had Violin's name put down for a forthcoming teaching position, but cannot
say how the Ministry of Education will judge that name.
-
OJ 6/8, [22] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated April 21, 1933
Schenker eagerly awaits Violin’s arrival in Vienna. He will soon send his
friend a copy of the Brahms study Oktaven und Quinten.
-
OJ 8/5, [17] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked April 28, 1933
Schenker reports that his article „Was wird aus der Musik?“ has just been
published in the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung.
-
OJ 9/34, [37] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1933
Cube, in response to OJ 5/7a, [45], defends his choice of a descent from 3, with neighbor-note 4, in
his analysis of the first theme of Beethoven Op. 26, mvt 1, with graphs as "proof"; he also defends political
developments in Germany, and attributes his threatened hunger to Violin's return to Vienna.
-
OJ 5/7a, [46] (formerly vC 46) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 14, 1933
Schenker disagrees with Cube's assertion in OJ 9/34, [37], that the Urlinie of the theme of
Beethoven, Op. 26, first movement, was a third-progression, not a fifth-progression, giving graphic proofs and
explaining Cube's misuse of the neighbor note. Hitler has done "historical service" in getting rid of Marxism;
someone is needed to get rid of musical Marxists; Schenker has created the tools. He provides background to
Moriz Violin's departure from Hamburg, reports on Jonas, Weisse, and Oppel, and inquires whether Cube has heard
from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 15/16, [92] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated May 23, 1933
Weisse thanks Schenker for Brahms's Oktaven u. Quinten, which he finds too
specialist a work to be of use to the uninitiated in Schenker's approach, and therefore does
not recommend for translation into English or use as a textbook. He reports a brief meeting
with Alfred Kalmus and a recent concert of his works, including a new violin sonata. He
gives Schenker his summer holiday address.
-
OJ 6/8, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 3, 1933
Preparing for Violin’s arrival, Schenker proposes that he ask the same lesson
fee that his friend would ask, 25–30 shillings per hour, for any new pupils he takes on. (He
will charge Miss Weber less, Hans Wolf perhaps a bit more.) Wolf will get tuition in theory,
but continue to study the piano with Violin.
-
OJ 10/18, [5] Handwritten letter from Elias to Schenker, dated June 17, 1933
Miss Elias sends best wishes for Schenker's birthday, and reports a visit from
Robert Brünauer. — She encloses an "assessment" by Paul Stephan of a concert conducted by
Carl Bamberger.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1, [4] Letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 28, 1933
The Violin family have escaped Nazi Germany, and are preparing for life in
Vienna; Violin looks forward to seeing his friend, and wishes him good
health.
-
OJ 5/7a, [47] (formerly vC 47) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 18, 1933
Schenker reports on a newspaper article and abortive radio program about his theory, by
Theo Goos; also on Jonas's forthcoming book, on van Hoboken, Moriz Violin, and Hans Wolf; and on
progress with Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 6/8, [24] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 9, 1933
Schenker suggests a possible time for Wolf’s first lesson, and a schedule for
him and Miss Weber. He is surprised to hear that Violin is thinking of emigrating to
Palestine, and suggests that the Jews there should come to Vienna to study with himself as a
“first-class Jew.” Their summer plans are not yet fixed.
-
OJ 8/5, [18] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated September 1,
1933
Schenker sends a postcard from Mönichkirchen am Wechsel, where he and Jeanette
are stopping over en route from holidaying in Lower Austria, to say that he will get in
touch with Violin when he returns to Vienna.
-
OJ 8/5, [19] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked September 15,
1933
Schenker explains to Violin the terms under which he will accept Hans Wolf and
Miss Weber as pupils during the 1933–34 teaching year, setting out his core theory
curriculum and demanding two lessons per week.
-
OJ 8/5, [20] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated September 26, 1933
Schenker has just given Hans Wolf a lesson, and insists on a full program of
tuition for him at a decent rate of pay. He reports that Vrieslander is writing a book about
him, and says that he will give him a copy of Jonas’s recent article when he next sees him.
He has written a letter to Alfred Weissberger on his friend’s behalf.
-
OJ 8/5, [21] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated October 8, 1933
Schenker inquires after Violin, from whom he has not heard for some time. He
reports that Hoboken is in France but will return at the end of the month to resume
lessons.
-
OJ 8/5, [22] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated October 25, 1933
Schenker reports that Ludwig Karpath has been lying, and that six new
appointments have already been made at the Vienna Academy. His new pupil, Hans Wolf, is
thirsting after Urlinie analysis, which Schenker has to resist.
-
OJ 8/5, [23] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated October 27, 1933
Schenker has worked out a lesson plan that leaves him free on Wednesday
afternoon, a time he would like to reserve for visits from Violin and his family; but his
friend should feel free to turn up at other times.
-
OJ 8/5, [24] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 6, 1933
A new housemaid has meant some disruption to the routine in the Schenkers’
apartment, and a visit has to be rearranged; Hoboken is returning to
Vienna.
-
OJ 6/8, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated November 9, 1933
Schenker reports that Hoboken has asked to come for coffee, and he has invited
him for Saturday, as a result of which he offers his tickets for a concert conducted by Carl
Bamberger to Violin and his daughter.
-
OJ 8/5, [25] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked November 27,
1933
In a message deprecating Hoboken’s character, Schenker believes that Hoboken
(the “wandering Dutchman") is trying to stretch out his tuition by paying social calls with
his wife outside lesson times; he likes Vienna because the cost of living is lower than in
Holland.
-
OJ 6/8, [28] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 1, 1933
Schenker is lending Violin a copy of something amusing [a composition by Josef
Knettel] sent to him by Reinhard Oppel. He notes that Hans Wolf wants to leave Vienna early
for the holidays, but Schenker will insist on being paid in full for the lessons scheduled
in December.
-
OJ 6/8, [29] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 11, 1933
Schenker asks Violin to seek his sister Fanny’s help in finding someone who
can produce typed copies of an article about him published in America [Israel Citkowitz,
“The Role of Heinrich Schenker”].
-
OJ 5/18, 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 21, 1933
Schenker sends article [by Citkowitz]. — In response to Jonas's quoting from a
Jewish lexikon, he refers to the sermons by Cardinal Faulhaber, and writes of his pride in
being Jewish but in having assimilated thoroughly enough to establish favorable relations
with the Catholic church, antisemites, and the news media. — Implying a parallel between
himself and Jesus, he offers his "monotheistic theory of music" as "a new message to the
world from the Jews." — He has no copy of his Syrische Tänze; — writes of the work's
history.
-
OJ 12/6, [30] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 16, 1934
Jonas has mailed off the book [to his publisher]; he hopes that Schenker will
approve of it [when eventually he sees it]. It comprises four chapters and two appendices. —
He thanks Schenker for the gift of his Syrian Dances. — The Director of the Hochschule für
Musik in Berlin, Fritz Stein, has written that he cannot arrange a position for Jonas,
whereas Jonas (with support from Furtwängler) had sought only students to whom to give
[private] lessons. — Jonas alludes to difficult conditions under which he is working, and
describes his conflict with piano teacher Georg Bertram. — Relations with van Hoboken are
strained, despite Jonas's having included an appendix about the Photogrammarchiv in his
book.
-
OJ 6/8, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 23, 1933
Schenker arranges a time for Violin and his sister to have supper with him:
not too late in the evening. He does not intend to teach Hans Wolf for less than two hours a
week, on account of the substance of the theoretical material, but is willing to lower his
hourly rate for him.
-
OJ 6/8, [26] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 24, 1933
The Schenkers’ maid is ill and has been taken to the hospital, so the dinner
invitation to the Violins must be postponed.
-
OJ 9/34, [41] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated June 7, 1934
Acknowledges a (non-extant) letter in which Schenker had expressed dismay at a review (enclosed
with OJ 9/34, [40]) of a recent lecture by Cube, who explains the circumstances under which he had to disguise
the source of some of his ideas: Schenkerian theory is regarded as "Jewish rubbish," and is no longer discussed;
one has to choose one words carefully.
-
OJ 5/18, 43 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated June 24, 1934
Schenker reports on visit from Furtwängler and future visit; — reacts to news
in Jonas's letter; — Brahms on Beethoven's notation; — printing of Der freie Satz begins
soon.
-
OJ 11/16, [14] Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated June 25, 1934
Furtwängler sends a letter of recommendation for Moriz
Violin.
-
OJ 70/17, [2] Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to whomever, dated June 25, 1934
Furtwängler recommends Violin.
-
OJ 5/18, 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated July 22, 1934
Schenker praises Jonas's book highly; gives Hoboken's current address; —
Furtwängler has written a recommendation for Moriz Violin, who would like go to Jerusalem;
asks whether Vrieslander and Oppel are subscribers. — Comments on Bayreuth and
Wagner.
-
OC 44/15 Handwritten letter from Robert Brünauer to Schenker, dated September 20,
1934
Brünauer asks Schenker to put Moriz Violin in touch with Adalbert Franz
Seligmann.
-
OC 44/44 Handwritten letter from Hans Wolf to Schenker, dated September 25, 1934
Wolf is prevented from returning to Vienna from Hamburg by new conditions of
entry to Austria. He comments on a recently published article by Schenker.
-
OJ 9/34, [42] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1934
Quotes letter from Furtwängler in extenso touching on reasons for dismissal and
articulating the importance of Schenker's theory; Cube describes the impact of this letter on his
Director. The names of Schenker, Halm, and Kurth were deleted from a recent text of his, and
censorship has been imposed. Describes his own recent activities. Outlines his geometric theory of the
diatonic components of tonality. Encloses photograph of his wife and son; describes hardships. Denies
rumors that he has cheated Moriz Violin, and refers to the resulting backlash on him: Violin has a
"complex", feels downtrodden by everyone.
-
OJ 5/7a, [51] (formerly vC 51) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated October 26, 1934
Acknowledges OC 9/34, [42], and its contents; comments on the "youth of today" – organic
connection is the best thing for them; asks publisher of Schäfke book. Once Der freie Satz is in
print, he will give his mind to the continuation of the Urlinie-Tafeln. Schenker's name is included in
the Spanish Enciclicopedia universale.
-
OC 44/9 Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker dated October 27, 1934
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 59 and 60; Hoboken has no reason to complain about
his behaviour. — As a result of Hoboken's distribution of complimentary copies, Jonas has
received letters of appreciation. —Reacts critically to Willi Reich and his magazine 23. —
Describes plans for forthcoming events in Hamburg.
-
OJ 10/18, [10] Handwritten notecard from Elias to Jeanette Schenker, dated February 17,
1935
Miss Elias sends Jeanette Schenker a clipping of Moriz Violin's obituary for
Heinrich, together with publication details of Otto Vrieslander's edition of C. P. E. Bach's
Kurze und Leichte Klavierstücke.
-
OJ 10/18, [12] Handwritten letter from Elias to Jeanette Schenker dated June 28, 1935
Miss Elias thanks Mrs. Schenker for photographs, and regrets having missed her
phone calls. — She hopes Mrs. Schenker will recuperate in the spa house. — She reports that
Mrs. Schenker's wishes have been carried out with regard to Heinrich's gravestone and
remarks on the beauty of the inscription. — She comments on an article by Victor
Zuckerkandl, and reports her own activity in graphing a piano piece by Schenker and
re-graphing Beethoven's "Appassionata" Sonata.
-
OJ 10/18, [13] Handwritten letter from Elias to Jeanette Schenker dated August 1, 1935
Jeanette Schenker, currently in Hofgastein, has decided where to live in the
future; that involves leaving Keilgasse. — Elias supports Jeanette in her view of a new
edition of Harmonielehre. — Elias is surprised to hear the plan for a Schenker Institute in
Vienna. — She regrets that Schenker's aphorisms will not be published by Ungar. — She has
been unable to meet with Moriz Violin regarding the "Appassionata" Sonata. — She is reading
Der freie Satz.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [3] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated April 17, 1938
Violin tells Schoenberg he expects to obtain an affidavit to emigrate to the
USA, and ask if Schoenberg could write a letter of recommendation for work in San Francisco,
and advise him on possibilities there.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [1] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated May 2,
1938
Schoenberg reflects on his own relationship with Heinrich Schenker. — He is
willing to write a recommendation to Hertz for Violin and asks to whom to send it, and warns
Violin that it will not be easy to establish himself in San Francisco.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [4] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated June 11, 1938
Violin seeks an affidavit to emigrate and asks Schoenberg's help in achieving
this. He would like to move to San Francisco.
-
OJ 70/26, [1] Handwritten letter from Willem Mengelberg to Eva Violin, dated June 23, 1938
Mengelberg is unable to help Moriz and Eva Violin directly in obtaining positions
in America, but encloses a letter of recommendation to Julia Steinway for
Moriz.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [2] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin and others, dated
July 30, 1938
Schoenberg notifies Violin and two others that each may receive an affidavit
in the near future [for emigration to the USA].
-
LC ASC 27/45, [5] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated August 10, 1938
Violin provides Schenker with details of his wife and
himself.
-
OJ 70/35, [5] Handwritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated December 23,
1938
Schoenberg has asked a rabbi to produce an affidavit, and offers this to
Violin in advance of receiving it.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [6] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 17,
1939
Violin informs Schoenberg that he already has his affidavit, and thanks him
for his attempts. He asks Schoenberg for letters of recommendation for San
Francisco.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [3] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated March 2,
1939
Schoenberg is pleased that Violin has his affidavit, is happy to write
recommendations for him in San Francisco, and looks forward to seeing him in person
soon.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [7] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated May 17, 1939
Violin has been ill for three months, and is due to sail on May 27 arriving
New York June 5. He asks about the cost of travel from Los Angeles, where he hopes to stay
en route, to San Francisco, and gives a temporary address in New York.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [4] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated June 6,
1939
Schoenberg writes to Violin in New York, advises him on the trip to San
Francisco via Los Angeles, and hopes to be able to accommodate him/them in Los Angeles. — He
regrets his powerlessness [over the affidavit].
-
LC ASC 27/45, [8] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated June 13, 1939
Violin comments on American red tape. He has had to give the addresses of his
supporters and asks Schoenberg to provide a testimonial if asked; and expresses gratitude
for the Schoenbergs' offer of hospitality in Los Angeles.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [9] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated June 20, 1939
Violin asks Schoenberg to write to the refugee committee in San Francisco. He
will let him know his arrival time.
-
OJ 70/71, [2] Typewritten letter of recommendation from Schoenberg to the Coordinating Committee
for German Refugees, San Francisco, dated June 21, 1939
Schoenberg letter of recommendation to the Coordinating Committee for German
Refugees in San Francisco.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [10] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated July 7, 1939
Violin informs Schoenberg of his route from New York to
California.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [11] Handwritten notecard from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated July 19, 1939
Violin thanks the Schoenbergs for their hospitality, and promises his c.v.
shortly.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [12] Handwritten coverletter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated July 20,
1939
Covering letter or note to Violin's c.v. [LC ASC 27/45, [13], including list
of names.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [13] Handwritten curriculum vitae from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [July 20,
1939]
Violin's curriculum vitae.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [6] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated July 21,
1939
Schoenberg has written a letter of introduction and modified Violin's draft
c.v., explains how he has done the latter, and advises Violin what to do with the materials.
— He asks advice on how to get the best exchange rate for Mark/Dollar.
-
OJ 70/35, [6] Typewritten testimonial (carbon copy) from Schoenberg concerning Moriz Violin, dated
July 21, 1939
Schoenberg letter of recommendation to "whom it may concern."
-
LC ASC 27/45, [14] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated July 24, 1939
Violin tries to express his debt to Schoenberg for recent help. — He advises
Schoenberg on how to transfer money at half the standard dollar-mark exchange
rate.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [15] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated August 24, 1939
Violin reports his progress in contacting people in the Bay Area to whom he
has been given introductions.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [16] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated September 21,
1939
Violin expresses misgivings about his situation, and is concerned that his
daughter is in Amsterdam.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [8] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 16,
1940
Schoenberg informs Violin of a conversation he has had with [Robert Emmett]
Stuart about a position that is open [at the St. Louis Institute of Music] for which
Schoenberg would like to recommend him. He asks for the return of the general recommendation
he wrote for Violin earlier.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [9] Handwritten telegram draft from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 23,
1940
Schoenberg has wrongly addressed LC ASC 7/50, [8] and asks Violin to check
with the Post Office to recover the letter.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [17] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 26,
1940
Violin acquiesces to applying for the job in St. Louis, despite reservations
about the climate there. He laments the backwardness of San Francisco's musical world. He
admits to being "kept" by his wife.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [10] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 27,
1940
Schoenberg reports a letter that he has received from R. E. Stuart. He detects
that Gottfried Galston will see him as a rival, so advises Violin to write stressing his
primary area as composition. He regrets that he can no longer avoid recommending some of his
own students.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [18] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 29,
1940
Violin expresses pain that his wife has to do menial work to support them
both. He prefers not to apply for the St. Louis job because he feels Schoenberg was insulted
by Stuart's letter. He hopes to gain entrée to the performance world.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [11] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated February 2,
1940
Schoenberg encloses a letter from St. Louis suggesting that Violin may be
under consideration for the vacant position [in composition], and checks whether Violin
possesses letters from Brahms. — He has written attempting to counter Galston's
influence.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [19] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated February 12,
1940
Violin admits that he did not write to the St. Louis Institute of Music when
urged before, but has now done so. He wrote in English. — He reports the correspondence that
he brought with him from Vienna, and that which was lost or stolen on the
way.
-
OJ 70/38, [1] Typewritten letter from R. E. Stuart to Moriz Violin, dated April 2, 1940
The St. Louis Institute of Music does not feel sure enough of Violin's being
given the position in the event of being interviewed, and so wishes to spare him the expense
of travel. It questions whether, as a recently arrived European, he would be able to adapt
to the staff and students.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated April 8, 1940
Violin makes an outraged critique of the rejection letter he has received from
R. E. Stuart. — His daughter, Eva, is now safely in San Francisco.
-
OJ 70/35, [7] Typewritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 9, 1940
Schoenberg tempers Violin's reaction to R. E. Stuart's letter, offering a
sympathetic portrayal of the American character as courteous, unlike the Germans, and
describing the attitude and degree of preparation of American students. All German criteria
are inapplicable.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [13] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated May 19
1940
Schoenberg asks whether Violin has received a letter from him with a copy of
his twelve-tone composition lecture.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [21] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated June 8, 1940
Violin asks Schoenberg to write to Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge recommending him
to play with the Coolidge Quartet.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [22] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated October 23,
1940
Violin says that he is completely without work, but is not giving in to
despair.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [23] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated December 19,
1940
In sending Christmas greetings, Violin tells Schoenberg that he heard his
Second Chamber Symphony [by radio] from New York. — He speaks of a course that he has been
hired to teach at the Jewish Center, and mentions a second possibility without divulging
details.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 16,
1941
Violin reports on his "Music workshop" at the Jewish Center; is reading about
New York; is looking through his letters from Schoenberg from c.1902; reflects on knowledge
versus ignorance; wants to talk with Schoenberg about possibilities for playing in New
York.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [25] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated February 8,
1941
Violin expresses joy at the news of the birth of a son to
Schoenberg.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [26] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated March 29, 1941
Violin thanks Schoenberg for his recent stay in Los Angeles, and comments on
Schoenberg's lecture "Composition with Twelve Tones," which he attended during that stay. —
He reminds Schoenberg to advocate for him for an engagement with the New York New Friends of
Music; and he mentions for the first time his plan to found an institute in San
Francisco.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [27] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated April 14, 1941
Violin reports encouraging news on his planned "institute," spells out some of
his ideas, and seeks to discuss further with Schoenberg.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [14] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 15,
1941
Schoenberg gives his reaction to the description that Violin has given of his
role in Violin's planned "institute."
-
LC ASC 27/45, [28] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated May 21, 1941
Violin reports that he has been trying to rescue his sister from Vienna. — He
wants to report to Schoenberg in person how his "institute" ideas are developing.— He asks
for the score of a Schoenberg composition in order to see how the 12-tone method is
implemented. — He asks for answers to recently asked questions. — And he inquires after the
Guggenheim Foundation.
-
OJ 70/1, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Moriz Violin to Mrs. Schwabacher, undated [c. July 10,
1941]
Violin reports – perhsps protests – to Mrs. Schwabacher on his interview with
her agent, Mr. Pettis.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [29] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated July 20, 1941
Violin recounts his experience with one of his sponsors and subsequent
interview with her skeptical agent regarding an (unspecified) new project.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [30] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated April 5, 1945
Violin conveys his desperation over his job situation, and asks Schoenberg to
write to Pierre Monteux to request an interview.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [15] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 10,
1945
Schoenberg has written to Pierre Monteux on behalf of Moriz
Violin.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [16] Typewritten lettercard (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated May 3,
1945
Schoenberg follows up on his previous (unanswered) letter.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [31] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenbeg, undated [March? 1949?]
Violin writes of his solitude and despair. He sees that Schoenberg is coming
to San Francisco, and pleads to be allowed to meet with him.
-
OJ 70/35, [8] Typewritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 1, 1949
Schoenberg regrets that he is unable to visit San Francisco on account of
ill-health. He suggests Violin write an article on Schenker's theories for the Musical
Quarterly. He hopes to send Violin his forthcoming book "Style & Idea."
-
LC ASC 7/50, [18] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated May 8,
1949
Schoenberg regrets that he has had to cancel his visit to San Francisco, as he
has also his trip to Germany for his 75th birthday celebrations. He hopes to be able to
invite Violin soon.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [32] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [September? 17?,
1949]
Having read that Schoenberg did not attend a birthday concert for him in Los
Angeles, Violin asks after his health, anxious not to lose contact. He deplores a speech by
Furtwängler.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [34] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [October 1?,
1949]
Violin reports on a successful performance of a C. P. E. Bach concerto at the
Carmel Bach Festival and on a Music Teacher's Convention in San Francisco.
-
OJ 70/35, [9] Handwritten open letter from Schoenberg dated September 16, 1949, with handwritten
letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated October 14, 1949
Schoenberg sends a copy of his open letter on his 75th birthday, embedded
within a letter in which he expresses pleasure at Violin's report of his Carmel
performance.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [33] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [ late October?,
1949]
Violin writes of his longing for face-to-face communication with
Schoenberg.
-
OJ 70/37, [1] Typewritten letter from Roger Sessions to Moriz Violin, dated December 14,
1949
Roger Sessions proposes that he and Violin meet.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [35] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated December 22,
1949
Violin reports on his meeting with Roger Sessions and subsequent invitation to
Christmas Day lunch.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [36] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [ca. January 10,
1950]
Violin inquires whether Schoenberg might agree to serve as a judge in a
composition competition offered by Noel Sullivan.
-
OJ 70/35, [10] Typewritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated February 4,
1950
Schoenberg declines the invitation by Noel Sullivan to serve as a judge for a
composition prize, and urges Violin to be patient with Sessions.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [37] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, undated [1950]
Violin thanks Schoenberg for his copy of Style & Idea, and comments on it
enthusiastically. He describes himself as a "displaced artist."